Precise ranking of fruit and vegetable intake is important in nutritional epidemiology in order to elucidate the effects of fruit and vegetables on health and disease. The FFQ has been the dominant instrument in nutritional epidemiology for more than 30 years(Reference Subar, Thompson and Kipnis1). However, every new or adjusted FFQ has to be validated to get an expression of the degree to which it is an accurate measure in the target population. Dietary biomarkers represent an objective alternative to the traditional food registration methods(Reference Willett2, Reference Jenab, Slimani and Bictash3). However, biomarkers that directly reflect the intake of a food group are scarce, and there is a great need of a larger variety of dietary biomarkers to be developed. Previously, the plasma concentration of carotenoids(Reference Byers, Trieber and Gunter4–Reference Crispim, Geelen and Souverein13) and the 24 h urinary excretion of flavonoids(Reference Mikkelsen, Olsen and Rasmussen9, Reference Nielsen, Freese and Kleemola14, Reference Krogholm, Bredsdorff and Alinia15) have been used as independent reference methods in the validation of self-reported intake of fruits and vegetables. A few studies have validated self-reported fruit and vegetable intakes using plasma carotenoids and the 24 h urinary excretion of flavonoids in combination by using the method of triads(Reference Brantsæter, Haugen and Rasmussen16, Reference Carlsen, Karlsen and Lillegaard17). Collection of 24 h urine samples impose a larger burden on participants, and a biomarker measured in overnight or spot urine samples would thus be very valuable as an independent measure or for the validation of dietary instruments. Previous studies(Reference Krogholm, Haraldsdottir and Knuthsen18–Reference Mennen, Sapinho and Ito20) showed that the excretion of flavonoids, lignans and phenolic acids in overnight urine can be used as biomarkers of intake for polyphenol-rich foods. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the urinary recovery of flavonoids and enterolactone in an overnight urine sample could substitute the 24 h urinary recovery of flavonoid aglycones and enterolactone as an alternative and more feasible biomarker of fruit, vegetable and beverage intake.
Materials and methods
Subjects and study design
The overall aim of the Inter99 study was to decrease the incidence of IHD. An age- and sex-stratified random sample of 13 016 individuals born from 1939 to 1940 and living in the south-western part of Copenhagen was drawn from the study population that comprised 61 301 individuals. Of these, eighty-two individuals were non-eligible, as they had died or could not be traced. The remaining 12 934 subjects were invited for a health-screening programme at the Research Centre for Prevention and Health. A total of 6906 (53·4 %) turned up for the investigation. Of these, 122 were excluded because of alcoholism, drug abuse or linguistic barriers. Individuals at high risk of developing IHD were re-invited after 1 and 3 years, and completed a 198-item FFQ at each time point. Individuals were categorised as high-risk individuals if they had either an absolute risk in the upper quintile of the distribution stratified according to sex and age or at least one of the following isolated risk factors: systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg and/or in antihypertensive treatment; total cholesterol ≥ 7·5 mmol/l; BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2; diabetes or glucose intolerance(21); or were daily smokers. The Inter99 study has been described in detail elsewhere(Reference Jorgensen, Borch-Johnsen and Thomsen22).
The validation study
Individuals attending the 3-year follow-up visit between 10 June 2002 and 16 February 2004 were personally and sequentially invited to participate in the validation study that, in addition to answering the FFQ, included: a 28-d diet history interview; collection of a 24 h and an overnight urine sample; and donating a blood sample. The 28-d diet history data were not included in the present study since the aim of the present study was to validate the flavonoid biomarker using two independent reference methods: plasma carotenoids and the FFQ. Participants included in the validation study did not differ from other participants at 3-years follow-up with respect to age, sex, physical activity, dietary habits, smoking, employment, diabetes, BMI and cholesterol (data not shown). A total of 284 individuals accepted participation in the validation study, of which seventeen did not turn up for the interview and two participants did not complete the FFQ, leaving 265 participants.
The 198-item FFQ
The FFQ applied on the Inter99 cohort has been described elsewhere(Reference Toft, Kristoffersen and Ladelund10). In short, the FFQ is a semi-quantitative questionnaire consisting of 198 food items and beverages. Participants were asked to report their average intake of different foods and beverages during the last month and included eight questions concerning fruit intake, eight questions on vegetable intake, one question on fruit juice intake, one question on vegetable juice intake and one question about tea and coffee intake. The questionnaire consisted of sixteen sections: number of meals; breakfast; bread and fat spread on bread; cheese, meat and fish, etc. laid on bread; hot meals; accompaniments to hot meals; sauces; fats for cooking; fast food; vegetables; salad dressing; fruits; snacks; candy/ice cream/chocolate; cookies; beverages. The food consumption quantity was obtained by multiplying the frequency of consumption of each unit of food by standard portion sizes. Daily food consumption was translated into energy and nutrient intakes using the Danish Food Composition Databank, version 6(Reference Saxholt, Møller and Ygil23) and the software program FoodCalc version 1.3(Reference Lauritsen24).
Collection and preparation of urine samples
Participants collected urine for 24 h within 2 weeks after completing the FFQ. The purpose of the urine collection was unknown to the participants, but the time for the collection was agreed upon before the start of the study. At the day for urine collection, the first morning urine void was discarded and all subsequent voids until 24.00 hours on the same day were collected. The overnight urine, defined as all urine voids from 24.00 hours including the first morning void, was collected separately. The 24 h urine sample constituted the sum of the two separate collections. All urine samples were kept cool and dark during collection. The subjects brought the urine collections to the study site immediately after ending the collection, where they were put in a fridge until weighed and adjusted to pH 3–4 with 1 m-HCl and stored at − 20°C for a maximum of 1 month and afterwards at − 80°C until analysis. Any urine collection which showed a para-aminobenzoic acid recovery below the limit classified as incomplete was excluded. For the HPLC method performed in the present study, the limit for completeness of 24 h urine has previously been assessed to 78 % recovery(Reference Jakobsen, Ovesen and Fagt25).
Determination of flavonoid aglycones and enterolactone in the urine
The concentrations of nine urinary flavonoid aglycones (quercetin, isorhamnetin, tamarixetin, kaempferol, hesperetin, naringenin, eriodictyol, phloretin and apigenin) and enterolactone were determined in 24 h urine and overnight urine samples by liquid chromatography (LC)–MS. Urine samples (2 ml) were subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis and solid-phase extraction before LC–MS analysis, as described in detail previously(Reference Nielsen, Freese and Cornett26, Reference Nielsen, Haren and Magnussen27). The flavonoid concentrations in the urine samples were determined as single determinations based on calibration curves generated by spiked blank urine samples(Reference Nielsen, Freese and Cornett26). In addition, supplementary calibration samples were included at the beginning, during and at the end of each series of samples, and a final adjustment was performed based on the level of the internal standards in each sample. Before and after each series of samples, the performance of the entire LC–MS assay was controlled by injections of aliquots containing all of the employed flavonoid standards, including the internal standards. There was no access to the applied LC–MS instrument when the urine samples with low internal standards were identified during the subsequent data processing, and consequently these samples had to be excluded instead of being re-analysed.
Collection and determination of carotenoids in the plasma
Fasting blood samples ( < 8 h) were drawn at the day of completing the FFQ, and it was unknown to the participants that the concentration of six carotenoids (lutein, zeaxanthin, β-cryptoxanthin, α-carotene, β-carotene and lycopene) would be analysed in the blood samples as a biomarker of fruit and vegetable intake. Plasma was treated with ethanol to precipitate proteins, and the carotenoids were extracted and determined, as described in detail previously(Reference Toft, Kristoffersen and Ladelund10).
Statistical analysis
The concentration of biomarkers and intake of fruit, vegetables and beverages did not have a normal distribution, so non-parametric tests were used in the statistical analysis of the data. We used linear regression to examine whether sex influenced the associations between the biomarkers and intake estimates, with the cross-product of sex and the biomarker as an interaction term. In order to fulfil model assumptions, square root transformation was applied to the variables. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to test differences between the groups and Spearman's correlation coefficients (r s) were used for the calculation of the correlations between the biomarkers and between the intake of various food groups and the reference measures. An intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated for evaluating the agreement between quintiles of the flavonoid biomarker by 24 h urine and overnight urine.
Triangular validity coefficients (VC) were calculated for the FFQ and each of the biomarkers by the following equation: 
$VC = \sqrt { r _{1}\times r _{2}/ r _{3}}$ , where r 1 is the correlation between the FFQ and biomarker 1 (flavonoid biomarker), r 2 is the correlation between the FFQ and biomarker 2 (carotenoid biomarker) and r 3 is the correlation between the two biomarkers(Reference Kaaks28, Reference Ocke and Kaaks29). We used maximum-likelihood estimation and bootstrap sampling with the statistical program R(30) to estimate VC and 95 % CI for these. Use of maximum-likelihood estimation eliminates the problems related to possible negative correlations or calculating VC larger than one, as explained elsewhere(Reference Ocke and Kaaks29).
All other analyses were performed with SPSS, version 14.0 (SPSS, Inc.). P values < 0·05 (two-tailed) were considered as statistically significant.
Results
Subjects
A total of 264 individuals participated in the validation study. The urine collections were incomplete for thirty-seven participants according to the para-aminobenzoic acid method. Furthermore, thirty-three participants were excluded due to low internal standard values identified during data processing and the lack of opportunity for quality control by re-analysis. Also, five participants were excluded because of incomplete dietary data, leaving 191 participants for the present study.
There were no differences in age, BMI, or any flavonoids or enterolactone excreted in 24 h urine between the male and female participants, while enterolactone and kaempferol in overnight urine were higher for women than for men (Table 1). Furthermore, we found no significant interactions with sex when examining the correlations between the intakes and the biomarkers, and consequently we performed all further analyses without stratifying by sex.
Age, BMI, urinary excretion of flavonoids and enterolactone in 24 h urine and overnight urine stratified by sex* (Medians, and 5th (P5) and 95th (P95) percentiles)
* Mann–Whitney U test.
Biomarkers
The median excretion of the sum of flavonoid aglycones and enterolactone in 24 h urine was 864 (5th percentile (P5) 258, 95th percentile (P95) 4659) μg/g creatinine. The quantitative largest amounts of flavonoids in 24 h urine were the citrus flavonoids naringenin and hesperetin (Table 2). The median 24 h urinary excretion of enterolactone was 233 (P5 13, P95 1306) μg/mg creatinine. In overnight urine, the excretion of the sum of flavonoids and enterolactone was 672 (P5 184, P95 5433) μg/g creatinine, and also here the citrus flavonoids were the quantitative largest group of flavonoids excreted. For the quantitatively major flavonoids, the excretion was higher in 24 h urine than in overnight urine. The flavonoid and enterolactone excretion in overnight urine strongly correlated with flavonoid and enterolactone excretion in the 24 h urine samples, and were >0·5 for all but phloretin and apigenin (Table 2).
Flavonoid aglycones and enterolactone excretion and correlations between 24 h urine and overnight urine in the validation study (n 191) within the Inter99 study (Medians, and 5th (P5) and 95th (P95) percentiles; correlation coefficients (r) and 95 % confidence intervals)
Ranking of the flavonoid biomarker (flavonoids+enterolactone) in 24 h urine and overnight urine into quartiles resulted in weighted κ (intraclass correlation coefficient) of 0·71 (95 % CI 0·63, 0·78). Furthermore, 84 % of the participants were ranked into the same or adjacent quintiles by overnight spot urine and 24 h urine and the degree of misclassification (opposing quintiles) was low (1·3 %).
The median concentration of the sum of six carotenoids in the plasma was 0·9 (P5 0·4, P95 2·2) μmol/l. The largest amounts of carotenoids were as follows: lycopene 0·3 (P5 0·1, P95 0·54) μmol/l, β-carotene 0·14 (P5 0·03, P95 0·54) μmol/l, phytoene 0·11 (P5 0·04, P95 0·33) μmol/l and lutein 0·11 (P5 0·05, P95 0·25) μmol/l (data not shown).
Correlations between the biomarkers and the intake of fruits, vegetables and beverages
The FFQ-estimated fruit and fruit juice intake and the vegetable intake were in general more strongly correlated with the carotenoid concentrations than with the urinary flavonoid aglycones and enterolactone in the present study. On the contrary, the intake of tea and wine was more strongly correlated with the excretion of flavonoid aglycones and enterolactone in the urine (Table 3). The strongest correlations were found between all fruits, juices and vegetables except potatoes and α-carotene (r s = 0·44), and between β-cryptoxanthin and citrus fruits and juices (r s = 0·43) and α-carotene and all vegetables (r s = 0·43). The strongest correlation between the flavonoids in the urine and food intake was seen for citrus fruits and juices and citrus flavonoids (r s = 0·38), and for tea intake and kaempferol (r s = 0·37). No significant correlations were seen between biomarkers and coffee consumption. Potato intake showed significant negative correlation with lutein and non-significant negative correlation with the sum of all the nine flavonoids and enterolactone (data not shown).
Bivariate correlations between the intake of fruits, vegetables and beverages determined by the FFQ and the biomarkers (BM) in 24 h urine, overnight urine and plasma (n 191)
Flav+ent, all nine flavonoids and enterolactone; ent, enterolactone; citrus flavonoids, sum of hesperetin, naringenin and eriodictyol; flavonols, sum of quercetin, kaempferol, isorhamnetin and tamarixetin.
Correlation coefficients were significantly correlated (Spearman's): *P < 0·05, **P < 0·01.
Statistically significant correlations between the urine and plasma biomarkers were found between plasma β-cryptoxanthin and naringenin in 24 h urine (r s = 0·39) and naringenin in overnight urine (r s = 0·26). Likewise, β-cryptoxanthin also correlated with nearly all flavonoids and enterolactone, e.g. hesperetin in 24 h urine (r s = 0·34) and in overnight urine (r s = 0·23), with the sum of all flavonoid aglycones and enterolactone in 24 h urine (r s = 0·33) and in overnight urine (r s = 0·28). Furthermore, α-carotene correlated with enterolactone in both 24 h urine (r s = 0·30) and overnight urine (r s = 0·28), the sum of lutein, α- and β-carotene with enterolactone in 24 h urine (r s = 0·32) and overnight urine (r s = 0·32), and all carotenoids with the sum of all flavonoids and enterolactone in 24 h urine (r s = 0·31) and in overnight urine (r s = 0·31) (data not shown).
The method of triads
Triangular VC were first calculated for 24 h urinary flavonoid and enterolactone, FFQ intakes and plasma carotenoids, and then for overnight urine flavonoids and enterolactone, FFQ intakes and plasma carotenoids (Table 4). For all food items, the VC for the flavonoid biomarker in 24 h urine (VCBM1-T) were higher (range 0·43–0·66) than for the flavonoid biomarker in overnight urine (range 0·39–0·49). The same was seen for the FFQ intake (VCFFQ-T), where the VC for the 24 h urinary flavonoids and enterolactone (range 0·43–0·64) were higher than those for the overnight urine biomarker (range 0·35–0·59).
Validity coefficients (VC) and 95 % CI for fruit and vegetable and tea intakes by the FFQ and the two independent biomarkers (BM), comparison of flavonoids determined in 24 h urine samples and overnight urine samples (Validity coefficients and 95 % confidence intervals, n 191)
* VC for comparison of the flavonoid biomarker in 24 h v. overnight urine samples.
Discussion
The main assumption behind dietary biomarkers is that they are objective measures and are independent of all the biases and errors associated with study subjects and dietary assessment methods(Reference Jenab, Slimani and Bictash3). It is important that the biological sample collections are unannounced, or at least that the purpose of urine or blood sampling is unknown to the participants, as in the present study. Otherwise, biomarkers may be affected by some of the same biases as self-reported dietary assessment methods.
In spite of the quantitative differences between the amounts of flavonoids and enterolactone in 24 h urine and overnight urine, ranking of individuals by the two methods showed strong agreement. Significant Spearman's correlations between the intakes of fruits, vegetables, juices and tea reported by the Inter99 FFQ and the flavonoid biomarker in 24 h as well as in overnight urine indicated that the flavonoid biomarker in both 24 h and overnight urine can be used to rank individuals according to high or low intakes of fruits, vegetables, juices and tea in the Inter99 cohort (Table 3). The VC for the FFQ ranged from 0·43 to 0·64 using 24 h urine and from 0·35 to 0·59 using overnight urine, indicating that the intake of fruits, vegetables, juices and tea were reflected by flavonoids both in overnight urine and in 24 h urine. Together, this indicates a reasonably stable ranking of individuals in both 24 h and overnight urine, which is of major importance for large epidemiological studies that typically only obtain overnight urine or spot urine samples.
In the present study, the FFQ-estimated intake of fruits, vegetables, juices and tea overall showed better agreement with the carotenoid biomarkers than with the flavonoid biomarkers. The Inter99 FFQ is a retrospective method covering the previous month of intake. Urinary flavonoids and enterolactone are short-term dietary biomarkers and thus the estimated intakes of fruits, vegetables, juices and tea in the Inter99 cohort would be expected to have a stronger correlation with the carotenoid biomarker, since the carotenoid biomarker is covering a much longer time frame (weeks to months) than the flavonoids in 24 h and overnight urine. Few validation studies(Reference Mikkelsen, Olsen and Rasmussen9, Reference Nielsen, Freese and Kleemola14, Reference Brantsæter, Haugen and Rasmussen16, Reference Carlsen, Karlsen and Lillegaard17) have previously included both flavonoids and carotenoids as biomarkers for fruit and vegetable intake. Carlsen et al. (Reference Carlsen, Karlsen and Lillegaard17) reported higher correlation coefficients for FFQ-estimated fruit, juice and vegetable intakes with total plasma carotenoids than with 24 h total flavonoids, while the opposite was seen in three other validation studies(Reference Mikkelsen, Olsen and Rasmussen9, Reference Nielsen, Freese and Kleemola14, Reference Brantsæter, Haugen and Rasmussen16). This may indicate that different structures of self-reported dietary methods, differences in sample size and differences in the study population influence the results.
In order to strengthen the performance of flavonoid biomarkers, collection of two or more overnight urine samples, rather that just one, could be a choice of strategy. The major reason why 24 h urine collection is considered to be difficult is the burden it imposes on participants, as they have to bring the collection bottles along through the whole day, e.g. to work or school. It is much easier to donate several overnight or spot urine samples than to complete one 24 h collection. Furthermore, if the overnight urine collections were pooled before the chemical LC–MS analysis, the cost would be held on the approximately same level as if only one overnight urine sample was used. A pool of several overnight urine samples, for instance four collections evenly distributed over a whole year, furthermore could turn the flavonoid biomarker into a long-term dietary biomarker, also taking seasonality into consideration. This would increase the applicability and value of the flavonoid biomarker in future diet–disease investigations. The usefulness of urinary flavonoids and other polyphenolic compounds in overnight urine as biomarkers of fruit and vegetable intake is supported by the findings of Mennen et al. (Reference Mennen, Sapinho and Ito20). They measured thirteen polyphenols and metabolites (chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, m-coumaric acid, gallic acid, 4-O-methylgallic acid, quercetin, isorhamnetin, kaempferol, hesperetin, naringenin, phloretin, enterolactone and enterodiol) in morning spot urine samples and found that the apple consumption was significantly correlated with phloretin, grapefruit consumption with naringenin, orange with hesperetin and citrus fruit consumption with both naringenin and hesperetin, with r s coefficients ranging from 0·31 to 0·57. The combination of fruits and/or fruit juices was furthermore positively correlated with gallic acid and 4-O-methylgallic acid, isorhamnetin, kaempferol, hesperetin, naringenin and phloretin (r s = 0·24–0·44), and they concluded that several polyphenols measured in a morning spot urine sample may be used as biomarkers of polyphenol-rich food intake(Reference Mennen, Sapinho and Ito20). In Mennen et al. (Reference Mennen, Sapinho and Ito20), the morning spot urine sample refers to urine taken in the morning of the third day of the study before breakfast and was thus part of the 24 h urine collection. The urinary recovery of enterolactone and isolariciresinol has in several studies been explained by the intake of vegetables(Reference Kilkkinen, Stumpf and Pietinen31–Reference Touillaud, Thiébaut and Fournier35). In accordance with this, the inclusion of enterolactone in the flavonoid biomarker in general improved the performance of the biomarker (see Table 3). Furthermore, the 24 h urinary recovery of enterolactone significantly correlated with the recovery of enterolactone in overnight urine (r s = 0·89; see Table 2), indicating that the urinary recovery of enterolactone in overnight urine may also be a good biomarker of vegetable intake. The elimination half-life of enterolactone is relatively slow (6–8 h)(Reference Manach, Williamson and Morand36) when compared with flavanones (approximately 2 h)(Reference Manach, Williamson and Morand36), and this may be one of the reasons why an overnight urine sample may be sufficient to reflect the previous day's intake of vegetables. Furthermore, the urinary recovery of enterolactone is rather high (14–37 %)(Reference Pérez-Jiménez, Hubert and Hooper37) when compared with flavonols (0·1–6 %)(Reference Manach, Williamson and Morand36), and this may increase the sensitivity of enterolactone as a biomarker of vegetable intake.
In the present study, we applied the method of triads to evaluate the performance of the flavonoid biomarker in overnight urine relative to 24 h urine. The VC were lower for one single overnight urine sample, but comparable with those obtained for 24 h urine (VC: 0·39–0·49 and 0·43–0·66, respectively). There is no general agreement as to what is considered as an acceptable magnitude for correlation and VC in dietary validation studies.
Although the biomarkers are objective measures of dietary intakes and not hampered by recall and estimation errors, correlation coefficients between dietary estimates and the biomarkers are generally lower than correlations between the two dietary methods. This is because biomarker concentrations are influenced by individual differences in absorption, metabolism and distribution, which, again, are influenced by age, weight, smoking and other factors(Reference Willett2, Reference van Kapple, Steghens and Zeleniuch-Jacquotte38). The VC obtained in the present study were of comparable magnitudes as reported in other studies using two biomarkers, and as in other studies using the triangular method, the CI were wide(Reference Andersen, Veierød and Johansson8, Reference Brantsæter, Haugen and Rasmussen16, Reference Carlsen, Karlsen and Lillegaard17). A main finding in the present study was that the relative validity of the FFQ regarding fruit, vegetable, juice and tea intake was acceptable whether using 24 h urine or overnight urine.
The major strength of the present validation of the flavonoid biomarkers is the inclusion of two independent reference methods of fruit and vegetable intake, enabling correct use of the method of triads(Reference van Kapple, Steghens and Zeleniuch-Jacquotte38–Reference McNaughton, Hughes and Marks42). In two previous studies(Reference Brantsæter, Haugen and Rasmussen16, Reference Carlsen, Karlsen and Lillegaard17), these biomarkers have been applied to validate FFQ for intakes of fruit and vegetable, and in both studies, 24 h urine collections were used for the flavonoid biomarker. In the study by Brantsæter et al. (Reference Brantsæter, Haugen and Rasmussen16), the flavonoid biomarker produced the highest VC with respect to fruit intakes, whereas the carotenoid biomarker produced the highest VC with respect to vegetable intakes. Carlsen et al. (Reference Carlsen, Karlsen and Lillegaard17) used two 24 h urine collection as the basis for the flavonoid biomarker, but the VC for fruit and/or vegetable intakes were higher for the carotenoid biomarker than for the flavonoid biomarker. Similar to Carlsen et al., we found higher VC for the carotenoid biomarker than for the flavonoid biomarker independent of whether the flavonoid biomarker was measured in 24 h urine or overnight spot urine. The discrepancy between studies may most probably be explained by the differing level of details in the assessment of fruit and vegetables and by other differences in the populations being studied. More studies are needed to refine the flavonoid biomarker for use in overnight and spot urine samples so that biomarkers may be included not only in validation studies but also as independent markers of dietary intake.
Conclusions
The main strength of the present study is the inclusion of two independent reference methods of fruit and vegetable intake, enabling correct use of the triangular method for the evaluation of flavonoids in overnight urine as a biomarker of fruit, vegetable and beverage intake. The present study indicates that flavonoids and enterolactone excreted in an overnight urine sample provide a valid estimate of the fruit, vegetable, juice and tea intake in the Inter99 cohort. Collection of 24 h urine is difficult and time consuming, and therefore overnight urine may be a more convenient tool than 24 h urine for the assessment and validation of fruit, juice, vegetable and tea intakes in epidemiological studies.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Anni Schou and Joan Elizabeth Frandsen from the Department of Toxicology and Risk Assessment for Expert Technical Assistance. This study was funded by the Research Centre for Environmental Health, Danish Ministry of the Interior and Health (ISMF) and the Danish Research Council (FELFO). The other authors declare that they have no competing interests. K. S. K. was involved in the preparation of the manuscript, contributed to the analyses of urine flavonoids and the statistical analyses. A. L. B. conducted the statistical analyses and contributed to the data interpretation and the manuscript. S. E. R. performed the analyses of urine flavonoids and contributed to the manuscript. L. K. and U. T. carried out the design of the validation study, collected and analysed the FFQ data and contributed to the manuscript. A. B. carried out the analyses of plasma carotenoids and contributed to the manuscript. J. J. performed the para-aminobenzoic acid analysis and contributed to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
