Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-7drmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T10:35:10.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Wisconsin Plasma Astrophysics Laboratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2015

C. B. Forest*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
K. Flanagan
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
M. Brookhart
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
M. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
C. M. Cooper
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
V. Désangles
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physique de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, CNRS, and Université de Lyon, 46 Allée d’Italie, 69364 Lyon CEDEX 7, France
J. Egedal
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
D. Endrizzi
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
I. V. Khalzov
Affiliation:
National Research Centre ‘Kurchatov Institute’, Moscow 123182, Russia
H. Li
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
M. Miesch
Affiliation:
High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307-3000, USA
J. Milhone
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
M. Nornberg
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
J. Olson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
E. Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
F. Roesler
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
A. Schekochihin
Affiliation:
Rudolph Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 6NP, UK Merton College, Oxford OS1 4JD, UK
O. Schmitz
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
R. Siller
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
A. Spitkovsky
Affiliation:
Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
A. Stemo
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
J. Wallace
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
D. Weisberg
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
E. Zweibel
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: cbforest@wisc.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Wisconsin Plasma Astrophysics Laboratory (WiPAL) is a flexible user facility designed to study a range of astrophysically relevant plasma processes as well as novel geometries that mimic astrophysical systems. A multi-cusp magnetic bucket constructed from strong samarium cobalt permanent magnets now confines a $10~\text{m}^{3}$ , fully ionized, magnetic-field-free plasma in a spherical geometry. Plasma parameters of $T_{e}\approx 5$ to $20~\text{eV}$ and $n_{e}\approx 10^{11}$ to $5\times 10^{12}~\text{cm}^{-3}$ provide an ideal testbed for a range of astrophysical experiments, including self-exciting dynamos, collisionless magnetic reconnection, jet stability, stellar winds and more. This article describes the capabilities of WiPAL, along with several experiments, in both operating and planning stages, that illustrate the range of possibilities for future users.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) The WiPAL facility consists of a main laboratory space where the vessel is housed and several auxiliary spaces for high-voltage power management, water pumping, computer control and housing the TREX insert. (b) The 3 m diameter vessel covered with arrays of probes and clear viewing ports.

Figure 1

Figure 2. A static calculation of the vacuum magnetic field from the permanent magnets at the edge and the background earth field. This calculation has been normalized by Hall probe measurements along a radial chord.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Time traces of plasma parameters and input power from a typical WiPAL discharge in helium (a,c) and argon (b,d). Radiated power is measured with a bolometer, $n_{n}$ is measured with a pressure gauge at the edge of the vessel (assuming room-temperature neutrals), $T_{e}$ is measured with a Langmuir probe inserted into the unmagnetized bulk, and $n_{e}$ is measured with the millimetre-wave interferometer system.

Figure 3

Table 1. Table of parameters achieved to date in separate discharges (with 10 of 18 possible cathodes and no ECR heating) as well as projected parameters. The ionization fraction, $f_{\%}$, is calculated using neutral pressure at the vessel wall and line-integrated electron density.

Figure 4

Figure 4. An example of a predicted dynamo-capable axisymmetric flow, with poloidal flow (left) and toroidal flow (right) is well diagnosed by the full motorized probe suite. WiPAL probe coverage will include both sweep probes (six total, left) and linear probes (18 total, right).

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a–f) Hydrodynamic simulations of edge-driven, two-vortex axisymmetric flow in He for increasing $\mathit{Re}$: (a) 1, (b) 3, (c) 10, (d) 30, (e) 100 and (f) 300. Axis of rotation and symmetry are vertical; left hemispheres show poloidal flow streamlines and poloidal flow magnitude; right hemispheres show toroidal flow contours. The poloidal flow scale is amplified $4\times$ relative to the toroidal flow scale. (g) Kinematic dynamo growth rate of the flows shown in (a–f). Increasing $\mathit{Re}$ results in a larger amount of kinetic energy in poloidal flows, which in turn lowers the critical $\mathit{Rm}$ required for positive magnetic eigenmode growth. Flow is only axisymmetric for $\mathit{Re}<300$; hydrodynamic instabilities produce non-axisymmetric modes at higher $\mathit{Re}$, requiring full 3D solutions to the induction equation.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Numerical solutions for turbulence-driven small-scale dynamo and evidence for large-scale field generation. To achieve $\mathit{Rm}=2000$ and $\mathit{Re}=400$ corresponds to a helium plasma with $V_{max}=10~\text{km}~\text{s}^{-1},~T_{e}=30~\text{eV},~T_{i}=1.2~\text{eV},~n_{e}=10^{18}~\text{m}^{-3}$ and $Z_{eff}=1.2$. Panel (a) shows where simulations find turbulent dynamos in $\mathit{Re}$ and $\mathit{Rm}$ space.

Figure 7

Figure 7. (a) Toroidal field coils and a cylindrical insert holding additional coils for driving reconnection will be inserted into the WiPAL vessel. (b) The large set of external Helmholtz coils is a recent upgrade to the WiPAL facility with utility for many future experiments.

Figure 8

Table 2. Key parameters for various reconnection experiments in hydrogen plasmas, where $B_{r}$ and $B_{g}$ are the reconnecting and guide fields, respectively.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Reconnection phase-space diagrams for weak guide-field reconnection (a) and strong guide-field reconnection (b) identifying various regimes of reconnection. The star characterizes the first plasma obtained with TREX, demonstrating its ability to access the new collisionless reconnection regime.

Figure 10

Figure 9. (a) A simulation of solar-like flow inside the WiPAL vessel with streamlines of poloidal flow. The internal rotation profile of the Sun is inferred from helioseismic inversions (Thompson 2014). Pink/red denote fast rotation and blue/green denote slower rotation as indicated by the colour bar. Inversions near the rotation axis are unreliable and are thus omitted from the plot. (b) The image of the angular velocity profile is reflected about the rotation axis in order to illustrate the full spherical geometry.

Figure 11

Figure 10. (a) WiPAL facility with centrifugal wind experiment installed and (b) proposed configuration showing the electromagnetic stirring scheme and Y-point.

Figure 12

Figure 11. Experiment to study jet expansion into background, finite-pressure plasmas. Simulation of the jet is taken from Li et al. (2006) and superimposed onto the WiPAL plasma schematic, showing coaxial injection geometry. (b) The assembled pulsed jet source preparing for first tests.

Figure 13

Figure 12. The axisymmetric ring cusp lends itself to a novel helicity injection experiment where currents, flowing between the magnetic pole faces, can be configured to inject small-scale magnetic helicity.