Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T02:30:47.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Caloplaca holocarpa group in the Nordic countries, except Iceland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Ulf ARUP
Affiliation:
Botanical Museum, Östra Vallagatan 18, SE-223 61 Lund, Sweden. Email: ulf.arup@botmus.lu.se
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Caloplaca holocarpa group in the Nordic countries, except Iceland, is defined genetically using the nrlTS DNA gene. The members are analysed with regard to morphology, anatomy, ecology, and chemistry. The results show that C. holocarpa seems to be a very small group, but there are many morphologically similar species outside the group. Within the group several species have been confused, but it is shown that C. holocarpa, C. pyracea, and C. vitellinula are separate taxa. Caloplaca cerinella also belongs to the group whereas C. cerinelloides does not, but is included in the treatment because of its similarity to the former species. Caloplaca lithophila H. Magn. is a synonym of either C. holocarpa or C. vitellinula, most probably of the latter. Many specimens determined to C. holocarpa belong to Caloplaca oasis, but this species is shown to have much more variable morphology and wider ecology and distribution than previously understood. Caloplaca oasis has also been confused with C. polycarpa, which is similar, but morphologically and genetically distinct, even though related. Neither of the two species belong to the C. holocarpa group, but are related to the C. citrina group, not to the C. velana group as usually believed. Other species from northern and central Europe similar to C. holocarpa belong in other groups. The treated species are described and illustrated in colour. Distribution maps are given for the study area. A key to species in northern Europe similar to C. holocarpa is also provided.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2009
Figure 0

Table 1. Sequences used in the phylogenetic analyses, with location, collector, and GenBank accession numbers. Specimens in bold were already to hand and the rest are newly produced. All specimens are deposited in Lund (LD) unless stated otherwise

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic analysis of the Caloplaca holocarpa group. One of the three shortest trees from the parsimonious analysis based on nrDNA ITS data. Numbers below the branches are bootstrap values >75. Cort. = corticolous; lig. = lignicolous; par. = parasitic; sax. = saxicolous.

Figure 2

Table 2. Mean, standard deviation, and range from lowest to highest mean value for species of the C. holocarpa group. (n = number of specimens studied)

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Caloplaca cerinella, a rather typical habitus (1941, Ahlner) Scale = 0·5 mm.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. The distribution of Caloplaca cerinella in the Nordic countries, except Iceland, based on studied material.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. The distribution of Caloplaca cerinelloides in the Nordic countries, except Iceland, based on studied material.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Species of Caloplaca. A, C. holocarpa, typical specimen from mountains with intensely orange apothecia (Sundell 5931); B, C. holocarpa, typical form from lowlands with more yellowish apothecia (1852, Fries); C, C. oasis, rather typical parasitic form growing on Verrucaria sp. (Arup L05070); D, C. oasis, typical non-parasitic form growing on concrete (Arup 05040); E, C. polycarpa, fairly typical specimen with well-developed, orange thallus and unusually well-defined prothallus (1996, Nimis & Tretiach); F, C. pyracea, typical specimen with scattered apothecia on a greyish thallus (Arup 05084); G, C. pyracea, less common habitus with more crowded apothecia and orange thallus (1948, Ahlner); H, C. vitellinula, very typical form with thin yellow thallus and scattered yellow apothecia (Hermansson 1577). Scales = 1 mm.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. The distribution of Caloplaca holocarpa in the Nordic countries, except Iceland, based on the material studied.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Caloplaca pyracea (bottom) and C. holocarpa (top)growing together on wood (1923, Eriksson). Even in a black and white photograph it is possible to separate the two species by the slightly larger apothecia with better developed thalline margin in C. pyracea. Scale = 1 mm.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Caloplaca oasis, close up showing a small parasitic thallus on Verrucaria sp. (Arup L07008). Scale = 1 mm.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. The distribution of C. oasis in the Nordic countries, except Iceland, based on the material studied.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. The distribution of C. pyracea in the Nordic countries, except Iceland, based on the material studied.

Figure 12

Fig. 11. The distribution of C. vitellinula in the Nordic countries, except Iceland, based on the material studied.