Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:52:07.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Montmorillonite-Hydrochar Nanocomposites as Examples of Clay–Organic Interactions Delivering Ecosystem Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Guodong Yuan*
Affiliation:
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Health and Land Resource, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing 526061, Guangdong, China
Jing Wei*
Affiliation:
Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, Nanjing 210042, Jiangsu, China
Benny K. G. Theng
Affiliation:
Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Private Bag 11052, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: yuanguodong@zqu.edu.cn
*E-mail address of corresponding author: yuanguodong@zqu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Clay–organic interaction is an important natural process that underpins soil ecosystem services. This process can also be tailored to produce clay–organic nanocomposites for industrial and environmental applications. The organic moiety of the nanocomposites, typically represented by a toxic surfactant, could be replaced by hydrochar formed from biomolecules (e.g. glucose) via hydrothermal carbonization. The effect of montmorillonite (Mnt) and glucose dosage on hydrochar formation, however, has not been clarified. In addition, the mechanisms by which Mnt-hydrochar nanocomposites (CMnt) can detoxify and remove carcinogenic Cr(VI) from aqueous solution are not well understood. In the current study, research milestones in terms of clay–organic interactions are summarized, following which the synthesis and characterization of CMnt for Cr(VI) adsorption are outlined. Briefly, 1 g of Mnt was reacted with 75 mL of glucose solution (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 mol L−1) by hydrothermal carbonization at 200°C for 16 h. The resultant CMnt samples were analyzed for chemical composition, functional groups, morphological features, and Cr(VI) adsorptive properties. Mnt promoted the conversion of glucose to hydrochars, the particle size of which (~80 nm) was appreciably smaller than that formed in the absence of Mnt (control). Furthermore, the hydrochars in CMnt had an aromatic structure with low hydrogen substitution and high stability (C/H atomic ratio 0.34–0.99). The weakened OH (from hydrochar) and Si–O–Si stretching peaks in the Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of CMnt are indicative of chemical bonding between Mnt and hydrochar. The CMnt samples were effective at removing toxic Cr(VI) from acidic aqueous solutions. Several processes were involved, including direct reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III), complexation of Cr(III) with carboxyl and phenolic groups of hydrochar, electrostatic attraction between Cr(VI) and positively charged CMnt at pH 2 followed by indirect reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III), and Cr(III) precipitation.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 2021
Figure 0

Table 1. C and H contents and their atomic ratios of parent Mnt, 0.5C, and CMnt prepared at various concentrations of glucose

Figure 1

Fig. 1. N2adsorption-desorption isotherms of montmorillonite (Mnt) and its complex with hydrochar (0.5CMnt)

Figure 2

Fig. 2. SEM images of a, b Mnt; c, d 0.5C; and e, f 0.5CMnt

Figure 3

Fig. 3. FTIR spectra of the 0.5C, parent Mnt, and CMnt prepared at various concentrations of glucose

Figure 4

Fig. 4 a Freundlich and b Langmuir isotherms as models for Cr(VI) adsorption onto CMnt at pH 2

Figure 5

Table 2. Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm parameters for Cr(VI) adsorption at pH 2

Figure 6

Fig. 5. SEM images and EDX data of 0.5CMnt after Cr(VI) adsorption at a, b pH 2 and c, d pH 8

Figure 7

Fig. 6. XPS spectra of 0.5CMnt before and after Cr(VI) adsorption at pH 2 and pH 8. a Survey spectra; b high resolution Cr 2p spectra; and c high resolution O 1s spectra

Figure 8

Table 3. Cr 2p peaks for 0.5CMnt before and after Cr(VI) adsorption at pH 2 and pH 8

Figure 9

Fig. 7. FTIR spectra of a 0.5C before and after Cr(VI) adsorption at pH 2 and pH 8, and b 0.5CMnt after Cr(VI) adsorption at various Cr2O72– concentrations

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Likely mechanisms of Cr(VI) adsorption on to CMnt