2.1. Heat equation

A schematic representation of the Graetz–Nusselt problem is provided in figure 1. Here, under the assumptions given in § 1, the governing equation describing stationary heat transport in a cylindrical system can be written as

(2.1) $$\begin{eqnarray}u\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}=\frac{{\it\alpha}}{r}\frac{\partial }{\partial r}\left(r\frac{\partial T}{\partial r}\right),\end{eqnarray}$$

where $u(r,b)$ describes the velocity profile of the laminar fluid flow in the $x$ -direction. The boundary conditions are $T(0,r)=T_{0}$ and $T(x,R)=T_{1}$ . At $x=0$ , the flow is hydrodynamically fully developed. Solution of the Navier–Stokes equation for stationary slip flow in the axial direction yields the following expression for the velocity profile:

(2.2) $$\begin{eqnarray}\tilde{u} =\frac{2\left(1-\tilde{r}^{2}\right)+4\tilde{b}}{1+4\tilde{b}},\end{eqnarray}$$

where $\tilde{u} =u/u_{av}$ , $\tilde{r}=r/R$ and $\tilde{b}=b/R$ . Here, $\tilde{u}$ can be interpreted as the sum of the variable velocity $\tilde{u} _{v}(\tilde{r},\tilde{b})=2(1-\tilde{r}^{2})/(1+4\tilde{b})$ and the slip velocity $\tilde{u} _{s}(\tilde{b})=4\tilde{b}/(1+4\tilde{b})$ . The heat equation can now be non-dimensionalised using ${\rm\Theta}=(T_{1}-T)/(T_{1}-T_{0})$ and $\tilde{x}=x/L$ ,

(2.3) $$\begin{eqnarray}\frac{\left(1-\tilde{r}^{2}\right)+2\tilde{b}}{2(1+4\tilde{b})}\frac{\partial {\rm\Theta}}{\partial \left(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz}\right)}=\frac{1}{\tilde{r}}\frac{\partial }{\partial \tilde{r}}\left(\tilde{r}\frac{\partial {\rm\Theta}}{\partial \tilde{r}}\right),\end{eqnarray}$$

with ${\rm\Theta}(0,\tilde{r})=1$ and ${\rm\Theta}(\tilde{x},1)=0$ .

2.2. Nusselt number

Using Fourier’s law of thermal conduction, the local heat transfer coefficient $h_{x}$ can be written as $h_{x}=-k/(\left\langle T\right\rangle -T_{1})\left.\partial _{r}T\right|_{r=R}$ (full mathematical and numerical details are given in the supplementary data available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.733). By rewriting the temperature gradient in dimensionless form using the dimensionless flow-averaged temperature $\left\langle {\rm\Theta}\right\rangle =(T_{1}-\left\langle T\right\rangle )/(T_{1}-T_{0})$ , we find for the local Nusselt number that

(2.4) $$\begin{eqnarray}\mathit{Nu}_{x}=-\frac{2}{\left\langle {\rm\Theta}\right\rangle }\left.\frac{\partial {\rm\Theta}}{\partial \tilde{r}}\right|_{\tilde{r}=1}.\end{eqnarray}$$

When $\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz}>0.1$ , $\mathit{Nu}_{x}\rightarrow \mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ .

2.3. Analytical expressions for thermally developing flow

To find an analytical expression for $\mathit{Nu}_{x}$ near the entrance of the pipe, the Lévêque approximation is followed. In that case, the governing equation can be solved in a two-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system:

(2.5) $$\begin{eqnarray}u\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}={\it\alpha}\frac{\partial ^{2}T}{\partial y^{2}}.\end{eqnarray}$$

Here, the wall is located at $y=0$ , i.e. the direction of the $y$ -axis is the reverse of that of the $r$ -axis. Then, with ${\tilde{y}}=y/R$ , the velocity profile becomes $\tilde{u} =4({\tilde{y}}+\tilde{b})/(1+4\tilde{b})$ .

The analytical expressions for $\mathit{Nu}_{x}$ for no-slip and no-shear flow are known (Bird et al. Reference Bird, Stewart and Lightfoot2007). For $\tilde{b}=0$ one can derive that

(2.6) $$\begin{eqnarray}\mathit{Nu}_{x}=\frac{2}{9^{1/3}{\rm\Gamma}\left(\frac{4}{3}\right)}\left(\frac{\tilde{x}}{\mathit{Gz}}\right)^{-1/3},\end{eqnarray}$$

where ${\rm\Gamma}$ denotes the gamma function. For no-shear flow, i.e.  $b=\infty$ , one finds

(2.7) $$\begin{eqnarray}\mathit{Nu}_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{{\rm\pi}}}\left(\frac{\tilde{x}}{\mathit{Gz}}\right)^{-1/2}.\end{eqnarray}$$

Thus, ${\it\beta}=1/3$ for parabolic flow and ${\it\beta}=1/2$ for uniform flow.

To arrive at an analytical expression for $\mathit{Nu}_{x}$ for finite slip (i.e.  $0<\tilde{b}<\infty$ ), (2.5) is non-dimensionalised using $Y=y/b$ and $X=x{\it\alpha}(R+4b)/(4u_{av}b^{3})=(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})(1+4\tilde{b})/\tilde{b}^{3}$ . This gives

(2.8) $$\begin{eqnarray}(1+Y)\frac{\partial {\rm\Theta}}{\partial X}=\frac{\partial ^{2}{\rm\Theta}}{\partial Y^{2}},\end{eqnarray}$$

with ${\rm\Theta}(0,Y)=1$ , ${\rm\Theta}(X,0)=0$ and ${\rm\Theta}(X,\infty )=1$ . To reduce the number of variables, we perform the Laplace transformation

(2.9) $$\begin{eqnarray}\mathscr{L}_{X}\left[\frac{\partial {\rm\Theta}}{\partial X}\right]=\int _{0}^{\infty }\frac{\partial {\rm\Theta}}{\partial X}\text{e}^{-pX}\text{d}X=p\bar{{\rm\Theta}}(p,Y)-1,\end{eqnarray}$$

where $\bar{{\rm\Theta}}$ is the Laplace transform of ${\rm\Theta}$ . Furthermore, $\mathscr{L}_{X}[\partial _{Y}^{2}{\rm\Theta}]=\partial _{Y}^{2}\bar{{\rm\Theta}}$ . The governing equation now becomes

(2.10) $$\begin{eqnarray}(1+Y)(p\bar{{\rm\Theta}}-1)=\frac{\partial ^{2}\bar{{\rm\Theta}}}{\partial Y^{2}},\end{eqnarray}$$

with $\bar{{\rm\Theta}}(p,0)=0$ and $\bar{{\rm\Theta}}(p,\infty )=1/p$ . Introduction of $\hat{{\rm\Theta}}=\bar{{\rm\Theta}}-1/p$ and subsequent rewriting yields

(2.11) $$\begin{eqnarray}p(1+Y)\hat{{\rm\Theta}}=\frac{\partial ^{2}\hat{{\rm\Theta}}}{\partial Y^{2}},\end{eqnarray}$$

with $\hat{{\rm\Theta}}(p,0)=-1/p$ and $\hat{{\rm\Theta}}(p,\infty )=0$ . To convert this expression into an ordinary differential equation (ODE), we define ${\it\eta}=p^{1/3}(1+Y)$ . Now the Airy equation is found,

(2.12) $$\begin{eqnarray}\frac{\text{d}^{2}\hat{{\rm\Theta}}}{\text{d}{\it\eta}^{2}}-{\it\eta}\hat{{\rm\Theta}}=0,\end{eqnarray}$$

with $\hat{{\rm\Theta}}(p^{1/3})=-1/p$ and $\hat{{\rm\Theta}}(\infty )=0$ . Its general solution of the first kind is the Airy function $\text{Ai}({\it\eta})$ , with $\lim _{{\it\eta}\rightarrow \infty }\text{Ai}({\it\eta})=0$ . Then the solutions for $\hat{{\rm\Theta}}$ and $\bar{{\rm\Theta}}$ become

(2.13a,b ) $$\begin{eqnarray}\hat{{\rm\Theta}}=-\frac{\text{Ai}(p^{1/3}(1+Y))}{p\text{Ai}(p^{1/3})}\quad \text{and}\quad \bar{{\rm\Theta}}=\frac{\text{Ai}(p^{1/3})-\text{Ai}(p^{1/3}(1+Y))}{p\text{Ai}(p^{1/3})}.\end{eqnarray}$$

To obtain ${\rm\Theta}$ , we take the inverse Laplace transform in $X$ , giving

(2.14) $$\begin{eqnarray}{\rm\Theta}(X,Y)=\frac{1}{2{\rm\pi}\text{i}}\int _{c-\text{i}\infty }^{c+\text{i}\infty }\frac{\text{Ai}(p^{1/3})-\text{Ai}(p^{1/3}(1+Y))}{p\text{Ai}(p^{1/3})}\text{e}^{pX}\text{d}p.\end{eqnarray}$$

For $\mathit{Nu}_{x}$ we can derive that, given that $\left\langle {\rm\Theta}\right\rangle =1$ following the Lévêque approximation,

(2.15) $$\begin{eqnarray}\mathit{Nu}_{x}=\frac{2}{\tilde{b}}\left.\frac{\partial {\rm\Theta}}{\partial Y}\right|_{Y=0}.\end{eqnarray}$$

Then, finally, we obtain

(2.16) $$\begin{eqnarray}\mathit{Nu}_{x}=-\frac{1}{\tilde{b}{\rm\pi}\text{i}}\int _{c-\text{i}\infty }^{c+\text{i}\infty }\frac{\text{Ai}^{\prime }(p^{1/3})\text{e}^{pX}}{p^{2/3}\text{Ai}(p^{1/3})}\text{d}p=\frac{2}{\tilde{b}}g(X).\end{eqnarray}$$

The function $g(X)$ is universal, as it does not depend on $\tilde{b}$ . The slip length affects the scaling between $X$ and $\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz}$ , so it determines which part of the function $g(X)$ is relevant. The supplementary information provides a description of how to evaluate $g(X)$ .

2.4. Thermal and viscous boundary layer thickness

The thermal boundary layer thickness $\tilde{{\it\lambda}}_{T}$ is defined as $\tilde{{\it\lambda}}_{T}=1-\tilde{r}({\rm\Theta}=0.99)$ . When ${\rm\Theta}(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz},0)<0.99$ , $\tilde{{\it\lambda}}_{T}=1$ .

The viscous boundary layer $\tilde{{\it\delta}}_{{\it\nu}}$ is defined as follows. It corresponds to the point $\tilde{r}=1-\tilde{{\it\delta}}_{{\it\nu}}$ where the parabolic velocity component $\tilde{u} _{v}(\tilde{r})$ equals $c$ times the slip velocity $\tilde{u} _{s}$ at the wall. Thus, $\tilde{{\it\delta}}_{{\it\nu}}(\tilde{u} _{v}=c\tilde{u} _{s})=1-(1-2c\tilde{b})^{1/2}$ . When $\tilde{b}\geqslant 1/(2c)$ , $\tilde{{\it\delta}}_{{\it\nu}}=1$ . It should be noted that, for a given $\tilde{b}$ and $c$ , $\tilde{{\it\delta}}_{{\it\nu}}$ is fixed for all $\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz}$ , while $\tilde{{\it\lambda}}_{T}=f(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})$ .

2.5. Numerical procedure

Numerically, the Graetz–Nusselt problem for finite slip was solved using the pdepe solver in matlab (MathWorks). The relative and absolute tolerances for the pdepe solver were set at $10^{-6}$ and $10^{-12}$ respectively. To calculate $\partial _{\tilde{r}}{\rm\Theta}$ at $\tilde{r}=1$ the matlab function pdeval was utilised.

Because heat transport mainly occurs near the inlet and near the wall, the $\tilde{x}\times \tilde{r}=82\times 101$ mesh was refined near these boundaries. The exponent ${\it\beta}$ was evaluated in two distinct manners. The fitting of a straight line through $\log _{10}(\mathit{Nu}_{x})$ for $-7\leqslant \log _{10}(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})\leqslant -4$ using the polyfit algorithm gives a specific constant value for ${\it\beta}$ for each $\tilde{b}$ , which is referred to as ${\it\beta}_{f}$ . The gradient of $\log _{10}(\mathit{Nu}_{x})$ or $\log _{10}(g(X))$ to $\log _{10}(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})$ , calculated by employing the second-order-accurate gradient algorithm, gives a local value for ${\it\beta}$ for each position, which is referred to as ${\it\beta}_{l}$ . Here, $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ is taken as the average of $\mathit{Nu}_{x}$ for $\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz}\geqslant 0.1$ . To compute $\left\langle {\rm\Theta}\right\rangle$ the trapz script was utilised. The value of $\tilde{{\it\lambda}}_{T}$ was approximated by linear interpolation using the two grid points closest to ${\rm\Theta}=0.99$ .

Figure 2.

(a) The local Nusselt number $\mathit{Nu}_{x}$ as a function of the position $\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz}$ for various slip lengths $\tilde{b}$ . The values of the scaling exponent ${\it\beta}$ and the developed Nusselt number $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ for the limiting cases of no-slip ( $\tilde{b}=0$ ) and no-shear flow ( $\tilde{b}=\infty$ ) are also indicated. (b) The scaling exponent ${\it\beta}_{f}$ (obtained by fitting) and the developed Nusselt number $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ as a function of the slip length $\tilde{b}$ . Remarkably, these two curves transition at different values of $\tilde{b}$ .

3.1. Nusselt profiles

In figure 2(a) the Nusselt profiles are displayed for a wide range of slip lengths $\tilde{b}$ . The profiles reveal that for $\tilde{b}<10^{-4}$ the classical Graetz–Nusselt solution for no-slip flow is approached, with ${\it\beta}=1/3$ . For $\tilde{b}>10^{2}$ the classical solution for no-shear flow is recovered, for which ${\it\beta}=1/2$ . For intermediate values of $\tilde{b}$ , the figure shows that first the exponent ${\it\beta}$ (the slope) starts to change value, followed by an increase of $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ .

The dependence of ${\it\beta}_{f}$ and $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ on the slip length $\tilde{b}$ is shown in figure 2(b). This figure illustrates that the transition points for ${\it\beta}_{f}$ and $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ are located more than one order of magnitude apart. The exponent ${\it\beta}_{f}$ changes value when $10^{-4}<\tilde{b}<10^{0}$ , while $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ gradually increases from 3.66 to 5.78 when $10^{-2}<\tilde{b}<10^{2}$ . This corresponds to the values for $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ found by Barron et al. (Reference Barron, Wang, Ameel and Warrington1997), who solved the Graetz–Nusselt problem in the thermally developed regime for $0\leqslant \tilde{b}\leqslant 0.24$ (Ezquerra Larrodé et al. Reference Ezquerra Larrodé, Housiadas and Drossinos2000). It should be noted that a change in the range of $\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz}$ values used to compute ${\it\beta}_{f}$ results in a different transition point for ${\it\beta}_{f}$ . The use of larger values shifts the transition point upwards. Nonetheless, the distance between the transition points for ${\it\beta}_{f}$ and $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ remains of at least one order of magnitude.

The exponent ${\it\beta}$ is not necessarily a specific constant value for finite slip as it is for no-slip and no-shear flow. Therefore, the local exponent ${\it\beta}_{l}$ was evaluated both numerically and analytically. In figure 3(a), ${\it\beta}_{l}$ is plotted versus $\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz}$ for various slip lengths $\tilde{b}$ . The profiles confirm that for approximately $10^{-4}<\tilde{b}<10^{0}$ , ${\it\beta}_{l}$ is not constant and depends on both the position and the slip length. Furthermore, we observe that ${\it\beta}_{l}$ always transitions from $1/2$ to $1/3$ , except for the limits $\tilde{b}=0$ and $\tilde{b}=\infty$ .

The numerical and analytical results are in good agreement, but start to deviate when $\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz}>10^{-5}$ . In that case the thermal and viscous boundary layer thicknesses are of the same order of magnitude ( $\tilde{{\it\lambda}}_{T}\approx 0.1$ for $\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz}=10^{-4}$ ). Consequently, the assumptions arising from the Lévêque approximation, and therefore also the analytical results, are no longer entirely valid.

3.2. On ${\it\beta}$ and its transition point

That ${\it\beta}_{l}$ must transition from $1/2$ to $1/3$ , except for $\tilde{b}=0$ and $\tilde{b}=\infty$ , can be demonstrated by inspection of the function $g(X)$ . First, as figure 3(b) reveals, the classical limits are recovered by this function, as $\mathit{Nu}_{x}\propto g(X)$ . When $\tilde{b}\rightarrow 0$ , we would expect that $g(X)\propto X^{-1/3}$ for $X\rightarrow \infty$ . Thus,

(3.1) $$\begin{eqnarray}\mathit{Nu}_{x}\propto \frac{1}{\tilde{b}}\left(\frac{\tilde{x}}{\mathit{Gz}}\frac{1}{\tilde{b}^{3}}\right)^{-1/3}=\left(\frac{\tilde{x}}{\mathit{Gz}}\right)^{-1/3}.\end{eqnarray}$$

When $\tilde{b}\rightarrow \infty$ , we would expect that for $X\rightarrow 0$ , $g(X)\propto X^{-1/2}$ . Then,

(3.2) $$\begin{eqnarray}\mathit{Nu}_{x}\propto \frac{1}{\tilde{b}}\left(\frac{\tilde{x}}{\mathit{Gz}}\frac{\tilde{b}}{\tilde{b}^{3}}\right)^{-1/2}=\left(\frac{\tilde{x}}{\mathit{Gz}}\right)^{-1/2}.\end{eqnarray}$$

Second, for each value of $0<\tilde{b}<\infty$ we can choose $\tilde{x}$ such that $X\rightarrow 0$ . As in that case (3.2) is recovered, we find that for finite slip ${\it\beta}_{l}$ always transitions from $1/2$ to $1/3$ . Consequently, it can be concluded that for a given slip length $\tilde{b}$ , the Nusselt profile in the thermally developing regime cannot be characterised by a single ${\it\beta}_{f}$ value. The range of $\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz}$ values used for computing ${\it\beta}_{f}$ is determinant for the value of ${\it\beta}_{f}$ that is obtained. Nevertheless, comparison of figures 2(b) and 3(a) shows that ${\it\beta}_{f}$ does reflect for what range of slip lengths $\tilde{b}$ the exponent ${\it\beta}$ changes value. Finally, since ${\it\beta}_{l}\approx 5/12$ when $X=1$ , the dimensionless number $X=(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})(1+4\tilde{b})/\tilde{b}^{3}$ can be considered as a kind of criterion for the behaviour of ${\it\beta}$ : ${\it\beta}\rightarrow 1/2$ when $X\ll 1$ , whereas ${\it\beta}\rightarrow 1/3$ when $X\gg 1$ .

Figure 3.

(a) The local scaling exponent ${\it\beta}_{l}$ versus the position $\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz}$ for various slip lengths $\tilde{b}$ . (b) The limiting behaviour of $g(X)$ , from which ${\it\beta}_{l}$ can be obtained analytically, is as expected: $g(X)\propto X^{-1/2}$ when $X\rightarrow 0$ , and $g(X)\propto X^{-1/3}$ when $X\rightarrow \infty$ .

Physically, the location of the transition regime for ${\it\beta}_{l}$ can be explained by considering the thickness of the thermal and viscous boundary layers. This is illustrated in figure 4(a). All heat transport takes place in the thermal boundary layer, where the temperature gradient at the wall, $\left.\partial _{\tilde{r}}{\rm\Theta}\right|_{\tilde{r}=1}$ , is most important. When the velocity in the thermal boundary layer, which is growing with $\tilde{x}$ , is dominated by the slip velocity $\tilde{u} _{s}$ , ${\it\beta}_{l}\rightarrow 1/2$ . In that case, the velocity profile in the thermal boundary layer is approximately uniform, and thereby resembles a no-shear flow. Then, the left-hand side of (2.5) can be approximated as $u\partial _{x}T=u_{v}\partial _{x}T+u_{s}\partial _{x}T\approx u_{s}\partial _{x}T$ . On the other hand, when the velocity in the thermal boundary layer is dominated by the parabolic velocity component $\tilde{u} _{v}$ , ${\it\beta}_{l}\rightarrow 1/3$ . The flow profile in the thermal boundary layer resembles a no-slip flow, i.e.  $u\partial _{x}T\approx u_{v}\partial _{x}T$ , for which ${\it\beta}=1/3$ .

The location where ${\it\beta}_{l}$ transitions from $1/2$ to $1/3$ can be predicted. In the thermal boundary layer, the slip velocity $\tilde{u} _{s}$ is dominating (i.e.  $\tilde{u} _{v}\ll \tilde{u} _{s}$ ) until the point $(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})_{1/2}$ . This location is estimated by calculating where $\tilde{{\it\lambda}}_{T}=\tilde{{\it\delta}}_{{\it\nu}}(\tilde{u} _{v}=0.1\tilde{u} _{s})$ . The parabolic velocity component starts to dominate in the thermal boundary layer (i.e.  $\tilde{u} _{v}\gg \tilde{u} _{s}$ ) from the point $(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})_{1/3}$ on. The point where $\tilde{{\it\lambda}}_{T}=\tilde{{\it\delta}}_{{\it\nu}}(\tilde{u} _{v}=10\tilde{u} _{s})$ roughly corresponds to this location. This implies that the transition regime for ${\it\beta}_{l}$ is located between $(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})_{1/2}$ and $(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})_{1/3}$ . The locations of $(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})_{1/2}$ and $(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})_{1/3}$ are given in figure 4(b). As an example, for $\tilde{b}=10^{-1}$ we find that $(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})_{1/2}=5\times 10^{-7}$ . This is in agreement with ${\it\beta}_{l}$ for $\tilde{b}=10^{-1}$ in figure 3(a).

Figure 4.

(a) The location of the transition regime for ${\it\beta}_{l}$ can be explained physically by considering $\tilde{{\it\lambda}}_{T}$ and $\tilde{{\it\delta}}_{{\it\nu}}$ . When the slip velocity $\tilde{u} _{s}$ dominates in the thermal boundary layer, which is the case when $\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz}<(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})_{1/2}$ , ${\it\beta}_{l}\rightarrow 1/2$ . When the velocity in the thermal boundary layer is dominated by $\tilde{u} _{v}$ , ${\it\beta}_{l}\rightarrow 1/3$ . This is true when $\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz}>(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})_{1/3}$ . (b) The locations of $(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})_{1/2}$ and $(\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz})_{1/3}$ as a function of the slip length $\tilde{b}$ are shown here. These points are estimated by saying that $\tilde{u} _{v}\ll \tilde{u} _{s}$ when $\tilde{u} _{v}=0.1\tilde{u} _{s}$ , and that $\tilde{u} _{v}\gg \tilde{u} _{s}$ when $\tilde{u} _{v}=10\tilde{u} _{s}$ .

3.3. On $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ and its transition point

The developed Nusselt number $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ concerns heat transfer in the thermally developed regime ( $\tilde{x}/\mathit{Gz}>0.1$ ). In this regime the temperature and temperature gradient at the wall are approaching zero. This implies that $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ can only be enhanced by increasing advective transport near the wall, where the temperature gradients are largest. Figure 5 demonstrates that when $\tilde{u} _{s}$ starts to change significantly with $\tilde{b}$ , $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ also transitions from 3.66 to 5.78, the limiting values for zero and infinite slip length.

Replacement of $\tilde{u} _{s}$ by the velocity gradient at the wall, $\left.\partial _{\tilde{r}}\tilde{u} \right|_{\tilde{r}=1}$ , leads to the same conclusion, however. An increase in $\tilde{u} _{s}$ implies that $\left|\partial _{\tilde{r}}\tilde{u} \right|$ must decrease. This follows from Navier’s slip condition, $\tilde{u} _{s}=-\tilde{b}\left.\partial _{\tilde{r}}\tilde{u} \right|_{\tilde{r}=1}$ , which shows that the slip velocity and the velocity gradient at the wall are directly related to each other via the factor $-\tilde{b}$ . Moreover, from the definitions of $\tilde{u} _{s}=4\tilde{b}/(1+4\tilde{b})$ and $\left.\partial _{\tilde{r}}\tilde{u} \right|_{\tilde{r}=1}=-4/(1+4\tilde{b})$ , we find that they have the same transition point, which is $\tilde{b}=1/4$ . This is close to the transition point of $\tilde{b}=0.4$ for $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ . Furthermore, their derivatives to $\tilde{b}$ , $\partial _{\tilde{b}}\tilde{u} _{s}$ and $\left.\partial _{\tilde{b}}(\partial _{\tilde{r}}\tilde{u} )\right|_{\tilde{r}=1}$ , are both proportional to $(1+4\tilde{b})^{-2}$ .

Therefore, the change of neither $\tilde{u} _{s}$ nor $\left.\partial _{\tilde{r}}\tilde{u} \right|_{\tilde{r}=1}$ with slip length $\tilde{b}$ fully explains the dependence of $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ on $\tilde{b}$ . It is the relation between the velocity distribution and the slip length $\tilde{b}$ that explains how $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ depends on $\tilde{b}$ . Nevertheless, because heat transport is largest when temperature gradients are maximum, the change of $\tilde{u} _{s}$ with $\tilde{b}$ most dominantly affects the behaviour of $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ . This is in agreement with the observation of Barrow & Humphreys (Reference Barrow and Humphreys1970) that, given an average fluid velocity, increase of the velocity at the wall leads to larger Nusselt numbers.

Figure 5.

The developed Nusselt number $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ and slip velocity $\tilde{u} _{s}$ versus the slip length  $\tilde{b}$ .

3.4. Employing wall slip to increase heat transfer

The Nusselt profiles in figure 2(a) suggest that heat transport can be optimised by employing wall slip, provided that the wall slip is large enough. Partial slip lengths are usually of the order of tens of nanometres for microscale systems (Rothstein Reference Rothstein2010). As a consequence, the maximum tube radius is approximately $1~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$ for ${\it\beta}$ to be significantly larger than $1/3$ . For $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }$ to be larger than 3.66, tube radii should be of the order of nanometres. However, the Graetz number is usually very small. For a typical liquid like water, $\mathit{Re}\sim 1$ and $\mathit{Pr}\sim 1$ . For both micro- and nanofluidics it is estimated that $D/L<10^{-3}$ , implying that $\mathit{Gz}<10^{-3}$ . In that case, the temperature profile is almost instantaneously thermally developed, as this is then true for $\tilde{x}\,>10^{-4}$ .

Thus, enhancement of heat transfer by employing finite slip, while avoiding reaching the thermally developed regime, is possible if two conditions are met. First, the system should be designed such that $\mathit{Gz}>1$ . Second, the slip length should be of the order of the tube radius, i.e.  $\tilde{b}\sim 1$ . These conditions oppose one another. In nanofluidic systems, slip lengths $\tilde{b}$ of approximately $10^{3}$ can be obtained (Whitby & Quirke Reference Whitby and Quirke2007; Majumder et al. Reference Majumder, Chopra and Hinds2011). This implies that $\tilde{b}$ is large enough to let $\mathit{Nu}_{\infty }\rightarrow 5.78$ , albeit the thermally developing section is negligibly small. Additionally, for instance, highly slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces (Lafuma & Quéré Reference Lafuma and Quéré2011; Wong et al. Reference Wong, Kang, Tang, Smythe, Hatton, Grinthal and Aizenberg2011) could be exploited to enhance heat transport.

It should be noted that the results presented here are applicable to systems that display homogeneous wall slip. Distinct results are expected for systems concerning effective slip (Maynes, Webb & Davies Reference Maynes, Webb and Davies2008; Maynes et al. Reference Maynes, Webb, Crockett and Solovjov2012; Enright et al. Reference Enright, Hodes, Salamon and Muzychka2013). As such, the Graetz–Nusselt problem for heterogeneously slippery surfaces deserves to be studied separately.