Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T08:06:44.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The structure of P21/c (Ca0.2Co0.8)CoSi2O6 pyroxene and the C2/c–P21/c phase transition in natural and synthetic Ca–Mg–Fe2+ pyroxenes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2018

Mario Tribaudino*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, della Vita e della Sostenibilità Ambientale, Parco Area delle Scienze 157/A, 43124 Parma, Italy
Luciana Mantovani
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, della Vita e della Sostenibilità Ambientale, Parco Area delle Scienze 157/A, 43124 Parma, Italy
Francesco Mezzadri
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, della Vita e della Sostenibilità Ambientale, Parco Area delle Scienze 157/A, 43124 Parma, Italy
Gianluca Calestani
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, della Vita e della Sostenibilità Ambientale, Parco Area delle Scienze 157/A, 43124 Parma, Italy
Geoffrey Bromiley
Affiliation:
School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A P21/c synthetic (Ca0.2Co0.8)CoSi2O6 pyroxene was synthesized by slow cooling from melt at high pressure. Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained and refined. The results were compared to those of C2/c pyroxenes along the series CaCoSi2O6–Co2Si2O6. Strong similarities in the crystal chemical mechanism of the transition with the synthetic CaFeSi2O6–Fe2Si2O6 and CaMgSi2O6–Mg2Si2O6 pyroxenes, both at an average and local level are apparent.

The results, examined together with two new refinements of pigeonite in the ureilites ALHA77257 and RKPA80239 and with a set of natural and synthetic C2/c and P21/c pyroxenes, show that the average cation radius in the M2 site is the driving force for the phase transition from C2/c to P21/c. The longest M2–O3 distances and the O3–O3–O3 angles follow the same trend, dictated only by the ionic radius in M2, in either synthetic or natural pyroxenes, regardless of the ionic radius of the M1 cations. The transition also affects the difference between bridging and non-bridging oxygen atoms and the extent of tetrahedral deformation, whereas the M1–O, M2–O1 and M2–O2 distances are unaffected by the transition and are determined only by the ionic radius of the bonding cation. The structural changes between the ionic radius and the high temperature C2/c and P21/c transitions are similar, and different to the high-pressure transition.

Analysis of natural and synthetic pyroxenes shows that the transition with composition occurs in strain free pyroxenes for a critical radius of 0.85 Å. Increasing strain stabilizes the P21/c structure to a higher temperature and larger cation radius.

Finally, our results show that the monoclinic P21/c Ca-poor clinopyroxene, i.e the mineral pigeonite, crystallizes only at conditions where the structure is HT-C2/c, and changes to the P21/c symmetry during cooling.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2018 
Figure 0

Table 1. Cell parameters and main structural results for pigeonite samples.

Figure 1

Table 2. Fractional coordinates and displacement parameters of pigeonite samples

Figure 2

Table 3. Selected bond length (Å) and angles (°) for pigeonite samples.

Figure 3

Table 4. Anisotropic displacement parameters for the single crystal (Ca0.2Co0.8)CoSi2O6.

Figure 4

Fig. 1. Comparison of the structures of C2/c (Ca0.4Co0.6)CoSi2O6 and P21/c (Ca0.2Co0.8)CoSi2O6 (Mantovani et al., 2013, this work). Both structures are projected onto (100). Bond lengths and kinking angles are shown.

Figure 5

Fig. 2. (a) M2–O; (b) M1–O; (c) individual; and (d) average T–O bond lengths of Ca–Co pyroxenes vs. Ca content. Data for Ca–Co: Mantovani et al. (2013) and this work.

Figure 6

Fig. 3. Tetrahedral structural parameters in Ca–Co pyroxenes: (a) difference between average bond length T–O bridging and non-bridging oxygen; (b) T–O–T and O3–O3–O3 angle; (c) bond angle variance of the M1 octahedron and the T tetrahedron in Ca–Co pyroxenes. Data for Ca–Co: Mantovani et al. (2013) and this work.

Figure 7

Fig. 4. Displacement parameters in Ca0.20Co1.80Si2O6, Ca0.15Mg1.85Si2O6 and Mg2Si2O6P21/c pyroxenes (this work; Tribaudino et al., 2002; and Pannhorst, 1984).

Figure 8

Fig. 5. Major axis of the atomic displacement parameter ellipsoid for oxygen in Ca–Mg pyroxenes (open diamonds) and in Ca0.2Co1.8Si2O6. The three oxygen atoms with higher displacement are in the order O3A, O2B and O3B, in Ca0.2Co1.8Si2O6 and Ca0.23Mg1.77Si2O6.

Figure 9

Fig. 6. O3–O3–O3 kinking angle of synthetic Ca–Mg, Ca–Fe and Ca–Co pyroxenes and natural pigeonites vs. average M2 ionic radius. Data from: Ca–Mg: Ohashi and Finger (1976), Bruno et al. (1982), Tribaudino et al. (1989), Tribaudino and Nestola (2002) and Tribaudino et al. (2012); Ca–Fe: Burnham (1967) and Ohashi et al. (1975); Ca–Co: Mantovani et al. (2013) and this work; natural pigeonite: Morimoto and Güven (1970), Clark et al.. (1971), Takeda (1972), Brown et al. (1972), Ohashi and Finger (1973), Belokoneva et al. (1981), Pasqual et al. (2000), Cámara et al. (2003) (also disordered pyroxenes), Tribaudino (2006) and Frey et al. (2010).

Figure 10

Fig. 7. M2–O3. (a) Longer and (b) shorter distance, (c) M2–O2, (d) M2–O1 bond distance of synthetic Ca–Mg, Ca–Fe and Ca–Co pyroxenes and of natural pigeonites vs. average M2 ionic radius. Data as in Fig. 6.

Figure 11

Fig. 8. Average M1–O bond distance of synthetic Ca–Mg, Ca–Fe and Ca–Co pyroxenes and natural pigeonites vs. average M2 ionic radius. Data as in Fig. 6.

Figure 12

Fig. 9. Difference between average bond length T–O bridging and non-bridging of synthetic Ca–Mg, Ca–Fe, Ca–Co and Ca–Zn pyroxenes and natural pigeonites vs. average M2 ionic radius. Data as in Fig. 6 including Gori et al. (2015) for Ca–Zn pyroxenes.

Figure 13

Fig. 10. Longest M2–O3A distance vs. difference in the O3–O3–O3 kinking angles for synthetic pyroxenes, natural pigeonites, at room and high pressure-temperature conditions. Data from: room conditions, see Fig. 5; high pressure: Nestola et al. (2004) and Alvaro et al.. (2010); high temperature: Tribaudino et al. (2002) and Cámara et al. (2003).

Figure 14

Fig. 11. M2 ionic radii of the Ca-poor phase coexisting with Ca-rich clinopyroxene and orthopyroxene at room pressure (solid line), C2/c–P21/c transition temperature (dashed line) and range of natural pigeonite vs. ionic radius. Red dots indicate the transition temperatures. Data from (lower to higher ionic radius): Shimobayashi and Kitamura (1991) two samples; Tribaudino et al. (2002), one sample arrowed; Alvaro et al. (2011) two samples; and Camara et al. (2003) five samples. The arrow in Tribaudino et al. (2002) indicates the transition range between strained and unstrained crystals.

Supplementary material: File

Tribaudino et al. supplementary material

Tribaudino et al. supplementary material

Download Tribaudino et al. supplementary material(File)
File 152.6 KB