Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-qr5l4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T22:41:01.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intraspecific morphological divergence among chemosymbiotic bivalves (Lucinidae) from anchialine lakes of San Salvador Island, Bahamas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2026

Broc S. Kokesh*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota 57701, U.S.A. Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A.
Brooke L. Long-Fox
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Biology, and Health Sciences, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota 57701, U.S.A. Phoenix Bioinformatics, Newark, California 94560, U.S.A.
Audrey T. Paterson
Affiliation:
Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, U.S.A.
Annette S. Engel
Affiliation:
Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, U.S.A.
Laurie C. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota 57701, U.S.A.
*
Corresponding author: Broc S. Kokesh; Email: kokeshb@morningside.edu

Abstract

Lakes can serve as cradles of biodiversity by facilitating adaptive radiation linked to distinct environmental conditions and ecological opportunities. On San Salvador Island, the Bahamas, karstification during Holocene transgressive flooding created anchialine lakes that have supported rapid evolutionary diversification, most notably among endemic pupfishes with specialized feeding strategies. To assess whether similar phenotypic divergence occurs in other members of these lake communities, we investigated morphological variation in shells of the chemosymbiotic infaunal bivalve Ctena sp. (Lucinidae). Live and dead Ctena specimens were sampled from muddy sediment filling karst pockets along the shorelines of three anchialine lakes, a habitat type from which chemosymbiotic bivalves have not previously been reported. Using two-dimensional geometric landmarks of shell interiors and valve margins, we found significant differences in shell shape, size, and allometric relationships among living populations from each lake. Death assemblages preserved similar among-lake patterns, suggesting that morphological divergence predates the window of time averaging represented by death assemblages. Living and dead-shell assemblages within each lake also differed significantly in shell shape, and temporal shape-change vectors from the dead to living included both shared and distinct trends among lakes.

Ongoing genomic work suggests that lake-dwelling Ctena on San Salvador represent a single endemic species. Thus, spatiotemporal patterns among lake populations likely reflect ecophenotypic responses to distinct sedimentological and geochemical conditions that influence their chemosymbiotic lifestyle. These results demonstrate the potential of combined life and death assemblage analyses to detect patterns of phenotypic divergence over geologically instantaneous timescales.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Paleontological Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of San Salvador Island, the Bahamas, with filled circles marking marine sites used for geochemical comparisons to lake conditions and the open square indicating inset region containing lakes studied here (photographs). Dotted line in inset map represents marked trails near the Gerace Research Centre (GRC). Stars at Crescent Pond, Moon Rock Pond, and Pain Pond indicate approximate sampling area along each lakeshore. Small circles indicate locations of karst conduit openings. Inset map after Knowlton et al. (2014).Figure 1. long description.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Photographed interior of a dead-collected Ctena shell with well-preserved features. Left, biologically significant features preserved on the interiors of dead shells, including the anterior adductor scar (aa), inhalant channel (ic), posterior adductor scar (pa), pallial blood vessel (pb), and pallial line (pl). Right, landmark configuration used in this study, as described in the “Materials and Methods.” Anterior direction to the right. Scale bar, 1 cm.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Measurements for (A) pH, (B) temperature (Celsius), (C) conductivity (μS/cm), (D) alkalinity as bicarbonate concentration (mg/L), (E) dissolved oxygen concentration (mg/L), and (F) dissolved sulfide concentration (mg/L) from pore-water samples from Crescent Pond (n = 4), Moon Rock Pond (n = 4), Pain Pond (n = 1), the south coast ocean control represented by Pigeon Creek (n = 9), and the north coast ocean control at Graham’s Harbour (n = 4).Figure 3. long description.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Biplot of the first two axes from redundancy analysis (RDA) for log-transformed and z-scaled pore-water geochemistry data. Percentage values on axis labels indicate the amount of total variation accounted for by that axis. Convex hulls are drawn around each location to aid in visualizing groupwise variation. Labeled arrows indicate the direction of influence by each geochemical parameter.Figure 4. long description.

Figure 4

Table 1. Results from Procrustes ANOVA of (A) shell shape variation, (B) centroid size variation, and (C) shape variation with centroid size as a covariate (e.g., a test of allometry), assessed for live-collected specimens, dead-collected specimens, and combined live and dead specimens. Bolded p-values indicate significance (p < 0.05). df = degrees of freedom; F = observed F-value; and p = p-valueTable 1. long description.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Plots of the first three axes from principal component analysis (PCA) for shell morphometric data of lake-dwelling Ctena, assessing (A, D) live-collected specimens, (B, E) dead-collected specimens, and (C, F) all specimens combined into a single dataset. Percentage values on axis labels indicate the amount of total morphological variation accounted for by that axis. Convex hulls are used to aid in visualizing groupwise variation.Figure 5. long description.

Figure 6

Figure 6 . A, Box plot of log-transformed centroid sizes among life and death assemblages from each lake. B, Allometric shape regression scores versus centroid size, emphasizing linear regression lines for each assemblage (solid lines for life assemblages, dashed lines for death assemblages).Figure 6. long description.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Plots of the first two axes from canonical variate analysis (CVA) for (A) live-collected specimens, (B) dead-collected specimens, and (C) all specimens combined into a single dataset. Percentage values on axis labels indicate the amount of total variation accounted for by that axis. Convex hulls are used to aid in visualizing groupwise variation.Figure 7. long description.

Figure 8

Table 2. Jackknife reclassification results as rounded percentages among (A) live-collected specimens, (B) dead-collected specimens, and (C) both live and dead specimens combined. Bolded values are percentages of correctly classified specimens. Overall classification accuracy for each respective analysis was 83.57%, 78.67%, and 80%. C = Crescent Pond; M = Moon Rock Pond; P = Pain Pond; L = live; and D = deadTable 2. long description.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Phenotypic shape trajectories between dead (open symbols) and live (filled symbols) specimens from each lake plotted on the first two principal component axes of model-fit coordinate values. Large symbols represent mean shape among each assemblage, with corresponding live (filled) and dead (open) means from each lake connected by line segments that represent the shape-change trajectories. Note that fitted coordinate values used for the trajectory analysis principal component analysis (PCA) are not equivalent to aligned specimen coordinates used to capture total variation, as in Fig. 5.Figure 8. long description.

Figure 10

Table 3. Pairwise comparisons of dead-to-live shape trajectories among lakes. Bolded p-values indicate significance following adjustment with the Holm procedure (p < 0.05)Table 3. long description.

Figure 11

Figure 9. Thin-plate spline (TPS) grids depicting the deformation from the overall mean landmark configuration of the dataset to the mean configurations of life (A–C) and death assemblages (D–F) from Crescent Pond (A, D), Moon Rock Pond (B, E), and Pain Pond (C, F). Deformations are magnified by a factor of four to aid in visualization.Figure 9. long description.

Figure 12

Figure 10. Box plot of internal shell area ratios among life and death assemblages from each lake. Ratios were calculated as the area of the semilandmark circle outlining the pallial line (inner mantle area) divided by the area of the semilandmark curve outlining the shell margin (outer margin area).Figure 10. long description.

Figure 13

Table 4. Summary of lakebed sedimentology, pore-water geochemistry, hypothesized environmental conditions, and Ctena population morphology characteristic to each anchialine lake assessed in this study. Summarized interpretations of lake environmental conditions ("Environmental Characterization") and consequences on chemosymbiosis ("Biological Interpretation") are elaborated on in the “Discussion” sectionTable 4. long description.