Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:36:25.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transcatheter retrieval of atrial septal defect and patent ductus arteriosus occluder: a guidance for device retrieval based on comprehensive bench tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2022

Takanari Fujii*
Affiliation:
Pediatric Heart Disease and Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center, Showa University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Hisashi Sugiyama
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
Hideaki Kanazawa
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Hidehiko Hara
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
Jun Muneuchi
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Japan Community Healthcare Organization, Kyushu Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
Satoshi Yazaki
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Fuchu, Tokyo, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: Takanari Fujii, MD, PhD, Pediatric Heart Disease and Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center, Showa University Hospital, 1-5-8, Hatanodai, Shinagawa-Ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan. Tel: +81-3-3784-8000; Fax: +81- 3-3784-8714. E-mail: takanarifujii@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

The aim of this study is to establish a guidance for device retrieval based on comprehensive bench tests.

Background:

Device embolisation remains a major complication in transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect and patent ductus arteriosus. Although percutaneous retrieval is feasible in the majority of cases, surgical retrieval may be required in complicated circumstances. However, the methods of transcatheter device retrieval have not been completely established.

Methods:

Bench tests of device retrieval were performed to verify the appropriate retrieval method according to device type/size. The devices used for testing were Amplatzer Septal Occluder (Abbott, Chicago, IL, United States of America), Figulla Flex II (Occlutech GmbH, Jena, Germany), Amplatzer Duct Occluder-I (Abbott), Amplatzer Duct Occluder-II (Abbott), and Amplatzer Vascular Plug-II (Abbott). The retrieval equipment constituted diagnostic catheters (multipurpose catheter and right Judkins catheter, 4-Fr or 5-Fr, Gadelius Medical, Tokyo, Japan), delivery sheath and cables for each device, Amplatz goose neck snares (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America), OSYPKA CATCHER (Osypka ag, Rheinfelden-Herten, Germany), and OSYPKA LASSOS (Osypka). We investigated the retrieval equipment and sheath sizes required for a successful retrieval procedure for variously sized devices.

Results:

For patent ductus arteriosus devices, the type of snare and the snaring position are considered important. For atrial septal defect devices, simple snare capture or a double-snare technique with a sufficiently large sheath is effective. Special care should be taken when using the OSYPKA CATCHER for device retrieval.

Conclusions:

The results of this study may assist in the selection of both capture devices and a retrieval sheath or a catheter for complete retrieval.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Details of in vitro bench tests

Figure 1

Figure 1. Test number 3-2. (a) A 6/4 ADO-I held in the centre of the cylindrical body with a 10-mm goose neck snare. (b–d) The device was folded in the middle and retrieved in the 10-Fr sheath.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Test number 3-4. (a, b) A 5/4 ADO-I held by the pulmonary end of the cylindrical body with a 10-mm gooseneck snare. (c, d) The device was pulled into an 8-Fr sheath. The pulmonary end was retrieved into the sheath first.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Test number 3-7. (a) A 5/4 ADO-I held at the end screw with a 4-mm microsnare which was assembled with a 4-Fr multipurpose catheter. (b, c) The device was pulled into a 7-Fr sheath.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Test number 4-2. (a) A 6/4 ADO-II held by the end screw with a 10-mm goose neck snare. (b–d) The device was pulled into a 4-Fr sheath. The end screw portion was folded at the proximal end and retrieved in the sheath.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Test number 4-4. (a, b) A 6/4 ADO-II held at the distal marker band, which is located on the opposite side of the end screw, with a 10-mm gooseneck snare. (c, d) The device was pulled into a 4-Fr sheath.

Figure 6

Figure 6. An FFII grasped by an OSYPKA CATCHER that became entangled, and the device could not be detached.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Test number 6-8. (a) A 36-mm FF II held a right atrial hub by a OSYPKA LASSOS. (b–d) The device was pulled into a 12-Fr sheath.

Figure 8

Figure 8. An "infolding" deformation of the sheath tip after multiple retrieval attempts that obstructed the sheath lumen and made it difficult to pull a device into the sheath.