Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:07:02.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Piezo-phototronic effect on optoelectronic nanodevices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2018

Rongrong Bao
Affiliation:
Beijing Institute of Nanoenergy and Nanosystems, School of Nanoscience and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; baorongrong@binn.cas.cn
Youfan Hu
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, Peking University, China; youfanhu@pku.edu.cn
Qing Yang
Affiliation:
College of Optical Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, China; qingyang@zju.edu.cn
Caofeng Pan
Affiliation:
Beijing Institute of Nanoenergy and Nanosystems, School of Nanoscience and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; cfpan@binn.cas.cn

Abstract

Optoelectronic nanoscale devices have wide applications in chemical, biological, and medical technologies. Improving the performance efficiency of these devices remains a challenge. Performance is mainly dictated by the structure and characteristics of the semiconductor materials. Once a nanodevice is fabricated, its efficiency is determined. The key to improving efficiency is to control the interfaces in the device. In this article, we describe how the piezo-phototronic effect can be effectively utilized to modulate the band at the interface of a metal/semiconductor contact or a p–n junction to enhance the external efficiency of many optoelectronic nanoscale devices such as photodetectors, solar cells, and light-emitting diodes (LEDs). The piezo-phototronic effect can be highly effective at enhancing the efficiency of energy conversion in today’s green and renewable energy technology without using the sophisticated nanofabrication procedures that have high cost and complexity.

Information

Type
Piezotronics and Piezo-Phototronics
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1. The piezo-phototronic effect in a nanowire (NW) photodetector (PD) array. (a[i, ii]) The measurement system used, and (iii, iv) device performance tuned by the piezo-phototronic effect. (ii) Optical microscope image of the device based on ZnO NWs. (iii) Current–voltage (I–V) curves and (iv) absolute photocurrent of the device under different strains. The arrows show the direction of strain change. It can be seen that the photocurrent is largely enhanced for pW level light detection, and the weak light detection is more sensitive by using the piezophototronic effect.7 (b[i]) (Left) Schematic illustration of the structure of the ZnO NW-based ultraviolet (UV) PD array. (Right) Optical image of the as-fabricated device. (ii) Scanning electron microscope image of the as-fabricated device before spin-coating a layer of SU-8 photoresist. The insets are (upper) before (upper) and (lower) after spin-coating a layer of SU-8. (iii) Current difference between strain free and 40.38 MPa pressure conditions, with illumination intensity of 1.38 mW cm2 and forward bias voltage of 1 V on the top electrode. (iv) The plot shows the enhancement factor, EF, as a function of the applied pressure, with the corresponding output currents to image the illumination distributions at an illumination intensity of 1.38 mW cm–2.26 Note: ND, neutral density; CCD, charge-coupled device; ITO, indium tin oxide.

Figure 1

Figure 2. The piezo-phototronic effect shown for nanowire (NW) array solar cells. (a[i]) Schematic diagram and the device fabrication process. (Left) First, a CdS NW with a metal contact at one end is partially immersed into a CuCl solution to (middle) form the Cu2S shell, and then (right) the metal contact at the other end was fabricated on the Cu2S shell; (ii) an optical microscope image of the Cu2S/CdS coaxial NW solar cell. Dependence of (iii) the open-circuit voltage (Voc), the short-circuit current (Isc), and (iv) relative efficiency change with strain. The relative conventional efficiency change of this photovoltaic (PV) device increased about 70% when a –0.41% compressive strain was applied.33 (b[i]) Schematic of the as-synthesized flexible solar cell based on an n-ZnO/p-SnS core–shell NW array. (ii) Cross-sectional scanning electron microscope image of the morphology of the as-synthesized ZnO NW array. (Upper) Side view of the morphology of the as-synthesized ZnO NW array. (Lower) Side view of the morphology of the n-ZnO/p-SnS core–shell NW array. (iii) Bending strain dependence of the solar energy-conversion efficiency. The performance of this PV device is enhanced when the NW array is subjected to a compressive strain (downward-bending strain) and is decreased when subjected to a tensile strain (upward-bending strain).35 Note: EVA, ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer; PMMA, poly(methyl methacrylate); ITO, indium tin oxide; PET, poly(ethylene terephthalate).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Nanowire light-emitting diode (NW LED) device controlled by the piezo-phototronic effect. (a) (Upper) Schematic and (lower) plot showing enhancement of emission light intensity with increasing strains for a single inorganic hybrid NW p–n junction LED. The device was fabricated with Mg-doped p-type GaN film and an n-type ZnO NW. The inset is the injection current of the LED at a voltage bias of 9V with increasing strain. Under the influence of the piezo-phototronic effect, the injection current of the device increases by 4×, and the output light intensity increases by 17×. This indicates that the corresponding conversion efficiency was improved by a factor of 4.25.42 (b) (Upper) Schematic and (lower) plot showing light emission enhanced with increasing applied strains for a vertically grown p–n junction single NW LED. (Lower) Emission intensity profile of the same location of the LED (marked with red dashed line). The emission intensity increased significantly with compressive strain. (c) (Upper) Schematic of the flexible piezo-phototronic hybrid NW array. (Lower) The plot shows enhanced light emission of the device with increasing pressures. The images show changes in the light intensity under different pressures for the same four pixel points.49 Note: V, voltage; ITO, indium tin oxide.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Visible pressure distribution sensor based on piezo-phototronic light-emitting diode (LED) arrays. (a[i]) ZnO/GaN p–n junction LED array used as a strain distribution sensor. (ii) Optical image of the device with a stamp with a pattern on top. (iii) Electroluminescence images of the device at strains of (upper) 0 and (lower) –0.15%. (iv) The plot shows that light-emitting intensity of the nanowire (NW) LED increased under applied compressive strain.58 (b) Flexible pressure distribution sensor based on the ZnO NW/p-polymer array. (Insets) Optical microscope images of single NW LED light spots. (i) Schematic illustration of the flexible NW-LED-based pressure sensor array after applying a compressive strain. (ii) Photograph of the flexible device. (iii) Optical images of a ZnO NW/p-polymer lighting up an LED array device. (iv) (Upper) Optical image of the convex-character pattern of “BINN.” (Lower) Electroluminescence image of the device at a stress of 80 MPa. The image clearly shows that a change in LED intensity occurred at pixels that were compressed, whereas those away from the patterned mask showed almost no change.59