Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T22:11:24.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disease–weather relationships for wheat powdery mildew under climate change in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2017

L. ZHANG,
B. Y. YANG,
S. LI and
A. H. GUO
L. ZHANG
Affiliation:
National Meteorological Center, Zhongguancun South Street NO.46, Haidian district, Beijing 100081, China
B. Y. YANG
Affiliation:
National Satellite Meteorological Center, Zhongguancun South Street NO.46, Haidian district, Beijing 100081, China
S. LI
Affiliation:
National Meteorological Center, Zhongguancun South Street NO.46, Haidian district, Beijing 100081, China
A. H. GUO*
Affiliation:
National Meteorological Center, Zhongguancun South Street NO.46, Haidian district, Beijing 100081, China
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: guoah@cma.gov.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Little is known about the quantitative relationships between wheat powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici) epidemics and climatic variables at the provincial scale in China, particularly under climate change. The present study assesses the actual disease process and corresponding impact on wheat yield and addresses climatic-driven variables that affect a powdery mildew epidemic. Powdery mildew increased in frequency from 1981 to 2010, and wheat yield decreased in most regions. It was clear that differences in disease and yield loss occurred temporally and spatially. Although particular weather variables were positively or negatively related to the disease, multiple stepwise regression analysis indicated that mostly fewer than three variables affected prevalence and severity of powdery mildew in each province. In most cases, some combination of higher temperature, humidity, rainfall and wind led to higher disease severity. These weather factors had different effects on disease development. The influence of climatic variables on powdery mildew tended to decrease from 1981 to 2010, whereas the effect of non-climatic factors increased and was attributed mainly to the use of fungicides and resistant cultivars. Therefore, the results of the current study suggest that wheat powdery mildew in China will not increase consistently in the future. In addition, the quantitative assessment method used in the current study can generally provide a good way to identify disease epidemics under climate change.

Information

Type
Climate Change and Agriculture Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 155 , Issue 8 , October 2017, pp. 1239 - 1252
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

INTRODUCTION

Wheat powdery mildew, caused by Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici, results in frequent disease damage to wheat worldwide. Initially, the lower leaves are most affected, but powdery mildew appears gradually over the entire crop and produces aggregate damage (Ferrandino Reference Ferrandino1989). Yield of wheat infected by powdery mildew is often reduced by 10–20%, sometimes up to 40% if the wheat crop is left untreated (Wiese Reference Wiese1987; Bockus et al. Reference Bockus, Bowden, Hunger, Morrill, Murray and Smiley2010). In China, ⩾0·50 of some wheat fields have been infected (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Gong, Zhang, Zhou, Chen, Yang, Chen, Wang, Lei and Liu2012). Therefore, it is important to be aware of powdery mildew and its management, as the resulting disease can reduce wheat yield significantly.

Although several excellent studies have been conducted on the spatiotemporal dynamics of wheat disease populations (Franke et al. Reference Franke, Gebhardt, Menz and Helfrich2009; Pautasso et al. Reference Pautasso, Döring, Garbelotto, Pellis and Jeger2012), as well as on the geographic distribution and environmental conditions required for epidemics (Moslonka-Lefebvre et al. Reference Moslonka-Lefebvre, Finley, Dorigatti, Dehnen-Schmutz, Harwood, Jeger, Xu, Holdenrieder and Pautasso2011; Shaw & Osborne Reference Shaw and Osborne2011; Liu et al. Reference Liu, Lei, Gong, Zhang, Wang, Zhou, Qi, Chen, Yang, Chang and Liu2015), there is a lack of epidemiological studies concerning the empirical quantitative relationship between powdery mildew and climatic conditions. As driving forces for the development of wheat powdery mildew, weather variables are essential for predicting disease during specific parts of the disease cycle, e.g. reproduction and dispersal (De Wolf & Isard Reference De Wolf and Isard2007; Te Beest et al. Reference Te Beest, Paveley, Shaw and Van Den Bosch2008). Differences in climate and agricultural practices lead to differences in the onset, development and severity of the disease each year. The inter-relationships between powdery mildew and weather factors have been the subject of several studies using statistical models (Te Beest et al. Reference Te Beest, Paveley, Shaw and Van Den Bosch2008; Wiik & Ewaldz Reference Wiik and Ewaldz2009); however, most of these studies were conducted to predict disease development, not to quantitatively assess the disease response to weather factors. Therefore, it is important to explore the processes involved to effectively forecast and manage the impact of the disease.

Agriculture is changing at an unprecedented pace worldwide due to global climate change (Pretty Reference Pretty2008). It is likely that climatic change has had a significant impact on wheat yield and quality (Bender & Weigel Reference Bender and Weigel2011; Lobell et al. Reference Lobell, Schlenker and Costa-Roberts2011). As a yield-limiting biotic factor, diseases merely quantitatively account for wheat yield (Barnes et al. Reference Barnes, Wreford, Butterworth, Semenov, Moran, Evans and Fitt2010; Roos et al. Reference Roos, Hopkins, Kvarnheden and Dixelius2011). Nevertheless, the effect of the environment on epidemic characteristics should be considered. For example, Chancellor & Kubiriba (Reference Chancellor and Kubiriba2006) predicted that the effect of powdery mildew on wheat will increase until 2020 and then decrease before 2080. However, available studies that have considered the likely effect of climate change on powdery mildew have invariably focused on future change and risk, and have depended on simulation models and emission scenarios (Volk et al. Reference Volk, Epke, Gerstner, Leuthner, Rotterdam, Johnen and Richthnfen2010; West et al. Reference West, Townsend, Stevens and Fitt2012), in which uncertainties may exist, rather than considering past climate change.

For timely region-specific prediction of disease severity and effective disease control, a better knowledge of the relationships between climatic factors and the specific disease is fundamental and necessary, especially under climate change. Given the geographic and climatic diversity of wheat production areas in China, it is likely that there are differences in wheat powdery mildew response to climate change; however, studies on this topic are still rare. Therefore, the present study was carried out at provincial and national scales, in order to: (1) assess and compare the actual occurrence of powdery mildew and its impact on wheat yield, (2) identify the key climatic factors driving the variation of wheat powdery occurrence, and (3) quantify and evaluate the disease response to climatic variables under current climate change, which can be applied for better understanding and warning of wheat disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area and data

The occurrence of wheat powdery mildew and the disease process varies substantially in different geographic zones. Since the early 1980s, the range and severity of powdery mildew have increased notably due to frequent use of nitrogenous fertilizers, production of semi-dwarf wheat cultivars and expansion of irrigated areas (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Li, He, Duan, Zhou, Chen, Lillemo, Singh, Wang and Xia2005; Luo et al. Reference Luo, Luo, Chang, Zhang, Zhang and Ren2009). Before the 1980s, powdery mildew occurred only occasionally in the southwest and coastal areas in Shandong Province, China. In the current study, ‘province’ was defined as the study unit (Fig. 1) during 1981–2010. Nineteen provinces and cities were included, i.e. Liaoning (LN), Beijing (BJ), Tianjin (TJ), Hebei (HB), Henan (HN), Shandong (SD), Shanxi (SX), Shaanxi (SHX), Gansu (GS), Xinjiang (XJ), Jiangsu (JS), Anhui (AH), Shanghai (SH), Zhejiang (ZJ), Hubei (HUB), Chongqing (CQ), Sichuan (SC), Guizhou (GZ) and Yunnan (YN), as well as the entire wheat region of China (N). Climate conditions in the study area vary from tropical in the southwest to temperate in the north. Annual mean air temperature was 8·4–16·4 °C, total rainfall was evenly distributed throughout the year from 170 to 1150 mm, and annual sunshine duration varied from 1491 to 2810 h.

Fig. 1.

The location of the study area. LN, Liaoning; BJ, Beijing; TJ, Tianjin; HB, Hebei; HN, Henan; SD, Shandong; SX, Shanxi; SHX, Shaanxi; GS, Gansu; XJ, Xinjiang; JS, Jiangsu; AH, Anhui; SH, Shanghai; ZJ, Zhejiang; HUB, Hubei; CQ, Chongqing; SC, Sichuan; GZ, Guizhou; YN, Yunnan.

Wheat powdery mildew disease data from 1981 to 2010 were obtained from the National Agro-Technical Extension and Service Center, collected during an annual investigation of a field at the local Plant Protection Station at the municipal (county) level and summed to the wheat occurrence area affected by the disease and a ‘precaution’ area, which received preventive measures, referred to in ha for each province. Yield loss in the presence of disease was collected and described in units of kg/ha for each province. Wheat yields from 1981 to 2010 were collected from the National Bureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China, which included annual wheat-planted area (ha) and actual yield after harvesting (kg/ha) at the provincial scale. Annual mean wheat yield from the 19 provinces and cities was calculated to represent N. Dates for each wheat growth stage differ across regions in China based on environmental conditions, climate and agronomic practices (Li et al. Reference Li, Bian, Liu, Ma and Liu2015; Hou et al. Reference Hou, Yang, Wang, Li and Xu2016). For example, wheat in the northern provinces and cities (i.e. LN, BJ, TJ, HB, HN, SD, SX, SHX and GS) experiences a specific overwintering stage in which the wheat merely survives compared with that in the southern provinces and cities (i.e. JS, AH, SH, ZJ, HUB, CQ, SC, GZ and YN). Hence, detailed data were collected from agro-meteorological stations across China where observations, i.e. wheat cultivar, phenological date, height, density, output factors and management including irrigation and fertilization, etc., were taken every 2 days.

Meteorological data from 1981 to 2010 were downloaded from the China Meteorological Data Sharing Service System and included daily mean temperature (T), maximum temperature (T m), minimum temperature (T n), precipitation range (P), relative humidity (H), wind speed (W) and sunshine duration (S d) at 323 stations in the study area (Fig. 1). Wheat powdery mildew epidemics tend to become significant once the wheat begins to grow rapidly (Vechet Reference Vechet2012). Therefore, rapid wheat growth was defined as the period from the beginning of stem elongation (GS 3·0) to early dough (GS 8·3) according to the BBCH growth stage scale (Hess et al. Reference Hess, Barralis, Bleiholder, Buhr, Eggers, Hack and Stauss1997), which was selected as the effective ‘impact season’ for a wheat powdery mildew epidemic. Other growing periods were not considered in the current study. The impact season at each meteorological station was obtained from the observed phenological date, taken from its nearest agro-meteorological station. Annual mean T, T m and T n, H, P and heavy rainfall days (i.e. number of days with daily precipitation >25 mm), W and S d of the impact season for each year were obtained by calculating daily climate parameters. These time-series data from the weather stations in each province and the entire study region were combined into a panel data set, and the data set was subsequently averaged to reveal provincial and national data (Tao et al. Reference Tao, Zhang, Xiao, Zhang, Rötter, Shi, Liu, Wang, Liu and Zhang2014).

Disease–weather relationships

The occurrence area ratio (OAR) of wheat powdery mildew was defined as the ratio of occurrence area of wheat powdery mildew to wheat-planted area, so comparisons could be made easily among provinces with clear differences in wheat production. Annual yield loss (ΔYield, as %) was expressed as the yield from wheat exposed to disease divided by the yield not exposed to disease and expressed as a percentage, as follows:

$${\rm \Delta Yield} = \displaystyle{{y_{\rm d}} \over y} \times 100$$

where y d is the yield from wheat exposed to powdery mildew and y is the yield from wheat not exposed to powdery mildew.

The tendency of each climatic variable was defined by a regression coefficient multiplied by 10 using linear regression analysis as follows:

$$x = ct + d$$
$$tre = c \times 10$$

where tre is the tendency of variable, x is the climatic variable, c is the regression coefficient, t is time from 1981 to 2010 and d is a regression constant.

The time-series data were converted to differences in OAR and climate parameters, i.e. differences (Δfactors) in values from one year to the next, to analyse the disease–weather relationships in the study regions. The significance of time trends in changes in the OAR and climate variables were determined using Student's t test at P < 0·05. The relationships between trends in OAR and climatic parameters were evaluated by Pearson's correlation analysis. Next, multiple stepwise regressions were performed for each province to observe trends in climatic parameters and to estimate the role of climate in recent OAR trends using the difference in OAR (ΔOAR) as the dependent variable and the differences in mean temperature (ΔT), maximum temperature (ΔT m), minimum temperature (ΔT n), relative humidity (ΔH), precipitation (ΔP), number of rainy days (ΔR d), number of heavy rainfall days (ΔH rd), wind speed (ΔW) and sunshine duration (ΔS d) as the independent variables, as follows:

$$\Delta {\rm OAR} = a + b_i\Delta x_i + \varepsilon $$

where ΔOAR is the observed trend in OAR, a is the averaged variation in OAR due to non-climatic factors, i.e. structure of cropping and management during wheat growth, b i is the OAR change response to each independent element, Δx i is the difference in T, H, W, P, R d and S d and ε is residual error.

Next, the contribution of OAR change response to climate change (h, as %) was quantified as follows:

$$h = \displaystyle{{b_i\Delta x_i} \over {\Delta {\rm OAR}}} \times 100$$

where b i Δx i is the variation of OAR induced by climate change, ΔOAR is the observed change in OAR during specific time series.

Given that OAR varied following climate change, the study period was divided into three individual time periods, 1981–1990, 1991–2000 and 2001–2010, to trace the climate–disease relationships under climate change. To compare, the response of the OAR to the climate trends over the whole study period from 1981 to 2010 was also investigated in each unit and over the whole study area.

RESULTS

Occurrence area rate trend and climate change

Obvious differences in mean OAR were observed in the study regions, ranging from 0·06 in XJ to 0·73 in SH during 1981–2010 (Fig. 2). Mean OAR values decreased successively in SH, JS, BJ, GZ, CQ, HB, SHX, SD, HN, GS and LN, corresponding to values of 0·73, 0·49, 0·41, 0·33, 0·32, 0·31, 0·30, 0·30, 0·26 and 0·25, respectively, which were above that for N (0·24). During the inter-decadal periods, i.e. 1981–1990, 1991–2000 and 2001–2010, mean OAR values in SH, JS, BJ, CQ, SD, HN, HB and GZ were all larger than that of N which were 0·16, 0·25 and 0·31 during each period, respectively. In contrast, XJ had the smallest mean OAR value, which was 2·16, 3·96 and 3·87 times smaller than that of N during each decade from 1981 to 2010, respectively. Tracing the development of mean OAR during the three periods, mean OAR for BJ, HN, TJ and AH was larger in 1991–2000 than that in 1981–1990 and 2001–2010. A decrease of mean OAR was detected in ZJ for the periods 1981–1990, 1991–2000 and 2001–2010. In contrast, clear increases were observed in the other provinces, with the biggest increase recorded in GZ and the smallest in XJ.

Fig. 2.

The mean occurrence area rate for the study regions during the study period. N, entire wheat region of China; SH, Shanghai; YN, Yunnan; BJ, Beijing; SC, Sichuan; TJ, Tianjin; AH, Anhui; SD, Shandong; SX, Shanxi; XJ, Xinjiang; JS, Jiangsu; HB, Hebei; HN, Henan; ZJ, Zhejiang; HUB, Hubei; GS, Gansu; GZ, Guizhou; LN, Liaoning; CQ, Chongqing; SHX, Shaanxi.

All climatic variables tended to vary at the provincial scale during the past three decades (Fig. 3). Daily mean temperature, T m and T n tended to increase from 0·14 to 1·03 °C/decade, whereas H, R d and W decreased by 0·37%/decade, 3·47 days/decade and 0·29 m/s/decade. Precipitation range, H rd and S d tended to differ among provinces and cities, ranging from −30·82 to 14·95 mm/decade, −0·40 to 0·30 day/decade and 44·02 to 39·57 h/decade, respectively.

Fig. 3.

The climate tendency for the study regions during the whole study period. T, daily mean temperature; T m, maximum temperature; T n, minimum temperature; H, relative humidity; R d, number of rainy days; H rd, number of heavy rainfall days; W, wind speed; P, precipitation range; S d, sunshine duration; N, entire wheat region of China; SH, Shanghai; YN, Yunnan; BJ, Beijing; SC, Sichuan; TJ, Tianjin; AH, Anhui; SD, Shandong; SX, Shanxi; XJ, Xinjiang; JS, Jiangsu; HB, Hebei; HN, Henan; ZJ, Zhejiang; HUB, Hubei; GS, Gansu; GZ, Guizhou; LN, Liaoning; CQ, Chongqing; SHX, Shaanxi.

Wheat yield loss trend

Wheat yields in the study regions decreased significantly due to the impact of OAR during the entire study period (Fig. 4). Annual yield loss caused by OAR differed at the provincial scale, with the greatest change in GZ (1·88%), followed by YN, JS, CQ, LN, SH, HUB, AH, TJ, SD, BJ, HN and GS, which exceeded the 0·39% in N. The smallest value was observed in XJ (0·12%). The ΔYield values during 1981–1990 in SH, GZ, TJ, JS, AH, BJ, CQ, HN, SD, YN and HUB were >0·50%, whereas that in SX was <0·10%. As time passed, the ΔYield values during 1991–2000 in YN, GZ, CQ and AH were >0·50%, whereas ΔYield values in the other provinces were 0·08–0·47%. The ΔYield value during 2001–2010 in GZ reached 3·12%, which was 2·02, 3·28, 3·60, 4·04, 4·23, 5·30 and 5·40 times greater than that in LN, YN, HUB, GS, CQ and JS, respectively, with values >0·50%. The ΔYield values decreased by 0·73, 0·61, 0·37, 0·30, 0·22 and 0·08% in TJ, AH, ZJ, HN, SD and N, respectively, but increased by 0·40% in SD during the past three decades.

Fig. 4.

The mean yield loss (%) of wheat caused by occurrence area rate for the study regions during the study period. N, entire wheat region of China; SH, Shanghai; YN, Yunnan; BJ, Beijing; SC, Sichuan; TJ, Tianjin; AH, Anhui; SD, Shandong; SX, Shanxi; XJ, Xinjiang; JS, Jiangsu; HB, Hebei; HN, Henan; ZJ, Zhejiang; HUB, Hubei; GS, Gansu; GZ, Guizhou; LN, Liaoning; CQ, Chongqing; SHX, Shaanxi.

Disease–weather relationships at the provincial and national levels

The correlations between the impact-season ΔOAR and the differences in the climatic factors in the study regions are given in Table 1. The impact-season ΔOAR value was positively correlated with ΔT in SC but negatively correlated with ΔT in SX during the entire study period, and no associations were found in the other provinces and cities. An observed trend in OAR was positively correlated with ΔT m at SC but negatively correlated with ΔT m in AH, SX and HUB. A significant positive correlation was observed between ΔOAR and ΔT n in SC, JS and CQ. The correlation between ΔOAR and ΔH was positive in BJ, AH, SD, SX, HB, HN, GS and SHX but negative in SC. A positive correlation was observed between ΔOAR and rainfall factors, including ΔP, ΔR d and ΔH rd in BJ, TJ, AH, SD, SX, HB, HN, LN and SHX. Observed trend in OAR was negatively correlated with ΔW in BJ, SX, ZJ and HUB, but was positively correlated with ΔW at SC. Observed trend in OAR and ΔS d were negatively correlated in AH, SD, SX, HN, HUB and SHX. The correlation between ΔOAR and humidity and rainfall factors was more significant than that of the other climate variables. The impact-season ΔOAR was positively correlated with ΔT n, ΔH, ΔP, ΔR d and ΔH rd but negatively correlated with ΔS d at the national scale; impact-season ΔOAR was not associated with ΔT, ΔT m or ΔW.

Table 1.

Correlation coefficients between the first differences value of yield and climatic factors at P < 0·05 during the whole study period (1981–2010) and each individual time period (1981–1990, 1991–2000 and 2001–2010)

ΔOAR, difference in occurrence area rate; ΔT, difference in mean temperature; ΔT m, difference in maximum temperature; ΔT n, difference in minimum temperature; ΔH, difference in relative humidity; ΔP, difference in precipitation; ΔR d, difference in number of rainy days; ΔH rd, difference in number of heavy rainfall days; ΔW, difference in wind speed; ΔS d, difference in sunshine duration; N, entire wheat region of China; BJ, Beijing; SC, Sichuan; TJ, Tianjin; AH, Anhui; SD, Shandong; SX, Shanxi; XJ, Xinjiang; JS, Jiangsu; HB, Hebei; HN, Henan; ZJ, Zhejiang; HUB, Hubei; GS, Gansu; LN, Liaoning; CQ, Chongqing; SHX, Shaanxi; SH, Shanghai.

Such relationships were complex during the inter-decadal periods. Overall, the ΔOAR was positively correlated with ΔT n, ΔH, ΔP and ΔR d but negatively correlated with ΔW and ΔS d in specific provinces. The relationships between ΔOAR and the climate variables weakened gradually over time in most provinces and cities.

Disease response to recent climate change

At least 23·3% of the variance in OAR was explained by climate variables at both the provincial and national scales during 1981–2010, except in SH, YN and GZ, and the most significant was 75·6% at SHX (Table 2). The OAR response patterns to climate change differed across the study regions. At the national scale, 50·4% of the variance in OAR was explained by T m and H, and OAR increased by 0·07 for every 1 °C rise in T m and decreased by 0·02 for every 1% decrease in H. Occurrence area rate increased by 0·18 for each 1 °C rise in T m during 1981–1990, but declined 0·04 for each 10 mm decrease in P. No clear OAR response to climate factors was detected during 1991–2000 or 2001–2010.

Table 2.

Multiple linear regressions analysis of the first differences in occurrence area rate and climate factors at P < 0·05 during the whole study period and each individual time period

ΔT, difference in mean temperature; ΔT m, difference in maximum temperature, ΔT n, difference in minimum temperature; ΔH, difference in relative humidity; ΔP, difference in precipitation; ΔR d, difference in number of rainy days; ΔH rd, difference in number of heavy rainfall days; ΔW, difference in wind speed; ΔS d, difference in sunshine duration; N, entire wheat region of China; BJ, Beijing; SC, Sichuan; TJ, Tianjin; AH, Anhui; SD, Shandong; SX, Shanxi; XJ, Xinjiang; JS, Jiangsu; HB, Hebei; HN, Henan; ZJ, Zhejiang; HUB, Hubei; GS, Gansu; LN, Liaoning; CQ, Chongqing; SHX, Shaanxi; SH, Shanghai.

The impact of climate change on OAR varied at the provincial scale during the study period. The variations in climatic factors affected the variations in OAR significantly (P < 0·05) during 1981–1990 and 1991–2000 in BJ, TJ, SD, HN, ZJ, HUB and SHX, but not during 2001–2010. The variance in OAR was explained by climatic variables only during 1981–1990 in HB. The effect of climatic factors on the variation in OAR in SC and SX was evident in 1991–2000 and 2001–2010 but not in 1981–1990. The climate factors had measurable impacts on OAR in GS during all time periods when OAR was determined by different variables. Occurrence area rate at GS increased by 0·04 in response to a 1% decrease in H during 1981–1990, and strengthened as time went on, with magnitudes of increase of 0·08 and 0·07 for a 1% increase in H and a 1 day decrease in R d during 1991–2000, as well as increases of 0·05 and 0·28 for a 1% increase in H and a 1 day decrease in H rd, respectively during 2001–2010. Consequently, the number of provinces and cities with a significant response to climatic factors decreased as time went on.

Climate change in the past three decades had a discernible effect on OAR in the study regions, and its contribution was determined from the observed relationships between OAR and the climate variables (Table 3). A 0·18 increase in OAR was detected during 1981–2010 on a national scale, and the contribution of climate change was −8%, while that of non-climate elements was 108%. When the study was divided into three periods, the contribution of climate change to the OAR tended to decline from 25% during 1981–1990 to 0% during 1991–2000 and 2001–2010.

Table 3.

Occurrence area rate (OAR) change, the contribution of climate driven and non-climate driven OAR changes during the whole study period and each individual time period

N, entire wheat region of China; SH, Shanghai; YN, Yunnan; BJ, Beijing; SC, Sichuan; TJ, Tianjin; AH, Anhui; SD, Shandong; SX, Shanxi; XJ, Xinjiang; JS, Jiangsu; HB, Hebei; HN, Henan; ZJ, Zhejiang; HUB, Hubei; GS, Gansu; GZ, Guizhou;LN, Liaoning; CQ, Chongqing; SHX, Shaanxi.

The contribution of climate change to OAR was determined during each study period at the provincial scale. A very slight effect of climate on OAR was observed in SH, YN, GZ and CQ, where the influence was detected only during one specific period. The climate variables changed the OAR trend during one period from 22 to 44% in JS, HB, AH, LN and XJ, but the contribution in TJ and ZJ was lower. An increase in the contribution of climate was apparent during the first two periods in BJ, ranging from −25 to 53%, and the contribution increased to 74% during 1981–2010. The contribution of climate to changes in OAR at SC decreased from 60% during 1991–2000 to −52% during 2001–2010. The contribution of climate to changes in OAR decreased successively from 1981 to 1990, 1991 to 2000 and 1981 to 2010 in SD and SHX, but increased in HN and HUB. The contribution of climate change to OAR varied frequently in GS with magnitudes of 1, 32, −17 and −10% during each decade from 1981 to 2010 and the entire period. Overall, the contribution of climate change to OAR declined gradually at both the national and provincial scales. Meanwhile, the contribution of climate change to OAR increased gradually from the southern to the northern provinces and cities.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, the occurrence of powdery mildew and its impact on wheat yield was identified over the past three decades. Clear increases of OAR were detected in the major provinces and cities, suggesting that powdery mildew tended to be severe. This was in agreement with simulated results of a similar increase conducted by previous researchers (Chancellor & Kubiriba Reference Chancellor and Kubiriba2006). Considering the disease effect, wheat yield loss ranged from 0·02 to 3·12% at the provincial scale, being smaller than such observations in some specific fields (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Gong, Zhang, Zhou, Chen, Yang, Chen, Wang, Lei and Liu2012). However, through analysis of differences in actual wheat yield from one year to the next in each unit, values of wheat yield loss were mostly <10%, implying the yield loss induced by powdery mildew played a significant role and should not be ignored in future wheat yield analysis. Of course, OAR and yield loss generally differed at the temporal and spatial dimension across the study regions, and such information will help to discriminate the infectious severity of powdery mildew.

Although the incidence of wheat powdery mildew was determined mainly by T, H, P, R d, W and S d, clear differences and even opposite correlations were detected in the different provinces and cities, except in SH, YN and GZ. This discrepancy may result largely from the different climates in the different regions of China, which produced different effects on powdery mildew development. Several factors were absent from the relationships, and fewer than three of factors (i.e. T m, T n, H, P, R d, H rd, W and S d) had notable roles in disease development in each province. Powdery mildew generally grows well in highly humid environments with moderate temperatures (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Hsam, Zeller, Wenzel and Mohler2000). In the current study, higher H favoured development of powdery mildew infection, which agreed with results of previous studies (Wiese Reference Wiese1987; Liu et al. Reference Liu, Lei, Gong, Zhang, Wang, Zhou, Qi, Chen, Yang, Chang and Liu2015). The positive correlation between OAR and P might be explained by the increase in H favouring disease development, as confirmed by Wiik & Ewaldz (Reference Wiik and Ewaldz2009) who found that P during the spring is important for disease epidemics. However, H rd can affect disease severity negatively, as high P can wash spores away (Merchan & Kranz Reference Merchan and Kranz1986), which would decrease the quantity of disease inoculum.

Temperature during the impact season affects the developmental rate and severity of the disease. As the optimal range for powdery mildew is 15–22 °C (Wiese Reference Wiese1987), the minimum and maximum temperatures are restrictive factors. The key factor affecting powdery mildew severity in the current study was T n; it was <12 °C in the study area. Since this is the minimal T n required for a damaging powdery mildew epidemic (Te Beest et al. Reference Te Beest, Paveley, Shaw and Van Den Bosch2008), any increase in T n would provide a more favourable environment for a disease epidemic. No clear association was found in the current study between OAR and T m; therefore, T m may be a more limiting factor for disease development. In the current study, it was near 20 °C and as high as 24 °C in most provinces; powdery mildew cannot tolerate temperatures >25 °C (Jones & Clifford Reference Jones and Clifford1983). However, no relationship was found between T and epidemic development, probably because the effect of temperature was integrated into T n. The current study used only mean temperature, but a detailed study by Te Beest et al. (Reference Te Beest, Paveley, Shaw and Van Den Bosch2008) emphasized that cumulative minimum temperatures >12 °C and the number of days with maximum temperature exceeding 20 °C resulted in a damaging epidemic, so these factors need to be carefully elucidated in further studies.

Powdery mildew disease severity is also influenced by W because conidia are transported by high W. A higher W was correlated with higher disease severity, which might be due to the humid environment created by W (Te Beest et al. Reference Te Beest, Paveley, Shaw and Van Den Bosch2008). These results were similar to Friedrich (Reference Friedrich1995), who concluded that higher W increased the probability of infection. Moreover, wind direction was another factor determining dispersal of wheat powdery mildew (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Lei, Gong, Zhang, Wang, Zhou, Qi, Chen, Yang, Chang and Liu2015), and is therefore suitable for studies on its effect on disease spread; however, studies might be limited due to shortage of detailed data. Mildew infections proceed under low-light intensity (Wiese Reference Wiese1987), but the effects of S d were inconsistent in different regions, probably because of differences in prevailing climatic conditions (Juroszek & von Tiedemann Reference Juroszek and von Tiedemann2013). However, they should be further investigated.

The impacts of climate change on powdery mildew disease prevalence are complex due to the different relationships among the climatic variables and variations in disease (Verreet et al. Reference Verreet, Klink and Hoffmann2000; Savary et al. Reference Savary, Nelson, Sparks, Willocquet, Duveiller, Mahuku, Forbes, Garrett, Hodson, Padgham, Pande, Sharma, Yuen and Djurle2011b ). A quantitative understanding of these relationships between disease occurrence and climatic variables is critical to determine the factors that affect the development of powdery mildew. In the current study, although the between-year variance in OAR explained by climate variables increased under climate change, the number of provinces where powdery mildew was affected by climatic variables decreased, and only five provinces (i.e. SH, SC, SX, XJ and GS) were predominantly affected by climatic variables. This finding indicated that the mean effects of climate gradually weakened in most units and across the entire wheat-growing region, which was consistent with reports suggesting that the significance of wheat diseases might not consistently increase in the future on a global or national scale (Juroszek & von Tiedemann Reference Juroszek and von Tiedemann2013) and that the overall risk of wheat powdery mildew would decrease (Savary et al. Reference Savary, Mila, Willocquet, Esker, Carisse and McRoberts2011a ). A similar result was reported by Cao et al. (Reference Cao, Yao, Xu, Zhou, Ding, Duan, Fan and Luo2015), who observed that climate variables only slightly increase the severity of wheat powdery mildew. Of course, inverse responses of disease to climate change occurred at XJ and SH, where the effects of climate increased disease severity. This was in accordance with studies reporting that climate change might modify the range of prevalent diseases in some regions in the future (Duveiller et al. Reference Duveiller, Singh and Nicol2007). Overall, the correlations between climatic variables and disease incidence provide a basis to explore disease progression based on weather conditions.

The current results suggest that the effect of climate change on OAR tended to weaken, while the effect of non-climatic factors was enhanced. Disease severity is frequently associated with the presence of the pathogen and resistance of the cultivar, regardless of conducive climatic circumstances (Chakraborty et al. Reference Chakraborty, Tiedemann and Teng2000). Therefore, a disease epidemic can be controlled by non-climate factors, i.e. use of fungicides and resistant cultivars (Ransom & McMullen Reference Ransom and McMullen2008). Fungicides are likely to be the most effective way to control disease in agriculture (Van Drooge et al. Reference Van Drooge, Groeneveld and Schipper2001; Lackermann et al. Reference Lackermann, Conley, Gaska, Martinka and Esker2011), and their use has increased gradually with an increase in occurrence of powdery mildew in China. Widely cultivated in China, wheat is classified into resistant, moderately resistant and susceptible host cultivars, which reveal different resistance levels to diseases (Babosha Reference Babosha2009; Li et al. Reference Li, Jia, Wang, Duan, Zhou, Wang and Lu2012). Khan et al. (Reference Khan, Trevathan and Robbins1997) postulated that particular wheat cultivars in Mississippi, USA develop significant diseases, and that there was a twofold difference in the response of different wheat cultivars to powdery mildew (Lopez et al. Reference Lopez, Rojas and Swart2015) in one specific region. As fungicides usually reduce OAR, cultivar resistance is a main non-climate factor determining variations in OAR. Resistant cultivars are better choice with potentially high durable resistance to powdery mildew (Troch et al. Reference Troch, Audenaert, Vanheule, Bekaert, Höfte and Haesaert2013; Asad et al. Reference Asad, Bai, Lan, Yan, Xia, Zhang and He2014). However, although weather conditions could occasionally reduce disease severity, such as in SX and CQ in the study area of the current work, the extent of powdery mildew occurrence would not decrease because of the presence of susceptible wheat cultivars in regions receiving greater threats from disease.

In the current study, there may be some uncertainties that should be noted. First, the work was based on the assumption that means wheat phenology was used for 1981–2010. Since previous reporters (Tao et al. Reference Tao, Zhang, Xiao, Zhang, Rötter, Shi, Liu, Wang, Liu and Zhang2014; He et al. Reference He, Asseng, Zhao, Wu, Yang, Zhuang, Jin and Yu2015) had argued that the wheat growth period would change in most zones, i.e. advancement of wheat anthesis and maturity date, and reduced growth period, these variations should be incorporated into further studies to investigate a more accurate response of OAR to climate change in the future, once detailed phenology data can be obtained from multiple observations. Next, the analysis period focused on the impact season in wheat production, providing an appropriate knowledge of climate–disease relationship at the wide temporal scale. However, further work is also needed to assess and determine whether there are critical times for powdery mildew epidemics, if reliable and timely assessments and prediction of disease occurrence are conducted to implement wheat protection activities. Comparatively investigating the relationship between OAR and climate variables at the provincial scale over the last few decades, associated with weather patterns, disease risk will change, requiring strategies for management be updated according to new climatic conditions, which can help farmers and policy makers optimizing disease management.

This project was funded by Meteorological Key Technology Integration and Application Program of China (CMAGJ2015Z02) and Meteorological Public Welfare Profession of China (GYHY201006026). The authors extend gratitude to the editor-in-chief and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on improving the quality of this paper.

References

REFERENCES

Asad, M. A., Bai, B., Lan, C. X., Yan, J., Xia, X. C., Zhang, Y. & He, Z. H. (2014). Identification of QTL for adult-plant resistance to powdery mildew in Chinese wheat land race Pingyuan 50. The Crop Journal 2, 308–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babosha, A. V. (2009). Regulation of resistance and susceptibility in wheat-powdery mildew pathosystem with exogenous cytokinins. Journal of Plant Physiology 166, 1892–1903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, A. P., Wreford, A, Butterworth, M. H., Semenov, M. A., Moran, D., Evans, N. & Fitt, B. D. L. (2010). Adaptation to increasing severity of phoma stem canker on winter oilseed rape in the UK under climate change. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 148, 683–694.Google Scholar
Bender, J. & Weigel, H. J. (2011). Changes in atmospheric chemistry and crop health: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 31, 81. doi: 10.1051/agro/2010013.Google Scholar
Bockus, W. W., Bowden, R. L., Hunger, R. M., Morrill, W. L., Murray, T. D. & Smiley, R. W. (2010). Compendium of Wheat Diseases and Pests, 3rd edn. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, X. R., Yao, D. M., Xu, X. M., Zhou, Y. L., Ding, K. J., Duan, X., Fan, J. R. & Luo, Y. (2015). Development of weather and airborne inoculum-based models to describe disease severity of wheat powdery mildew. Plant Disease 99, 395–400.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, S., Tiedemann, A. V. & Teng, P. S. (2000). Climate change: potential impact on plant diseases. Environmental Pollution 108, 317–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chancellor, T. & Kubiriba, J. (2006). T7.2: The Effects of Climate Change on Infectious Diseases of Plants. Review commissioned as part of the UK Government's Foresight project ‘Infectious Diseases: Preparing for the Future’. London, UK: HMSO. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140108140803/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/foresight/docs/infectious-diseases/t7_2a.pdf (accessed 17 May 2017).Google Scholar
De Wolf, E. D. & Isard, S. A. (2007). Disease cycle approach to plant disease prediction. Annual Review of Phytopathology 45, 203–220.Google Scholar
Duveiller, E., Singh, R. P. & Nicol, J. M. (2007). The challenges of maintaining wheat productivity: pests, diseases, and potential epidemics. Euphytica 157, 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrandino, F. J. (1989). A distribution-free method for estimating the effect of aggregated plant damage on crop yield. Phytopathology 79, 1229–1232.Google Scholar
Franke, J., Gebhardt, S., Menz, G. & Helfrich, H. P. (2009). Geostatistical analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of powdery mildew and leaf rust in wheat. Phytopathology 99, 974–984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedrich, S. (1995). Modeling infection probability of powdery mildew in winter wheat by meteorological input variables. ZeitschriftFurPflanzenkrankheiten Und Pflanzenschutz. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 102, 354–365.Google Scholar
He, L., Asseng, S., Zhao, G., Wu, D. R., Yang, X. Y., Zhuang, W., Jin, N. & Yu, Q. (2015). Impacts of recent climate warming, cultivar changes, and crop management on winter wheat phenology across the Loess Plateau of China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 200, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, M., Barralis, G., Bleiholder, H., Buhr, L., Eggers, T. H., Hack, H. & Stauss, R. (1997). Use of the extended BBCH scale-general for the descriptions of the growth stages of mono; and dicotyledonous weed species. Weed Research 37, 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, H. J., Yang, S. H., Wang, F. T., Li, D. & Xu, J. Z. (2016). Controlled irrigation mitigates the annual integrative global warming potential of methane and nitrous oxide from the rice-winter wheat rotation systems in Southeast China. Ecological Engineering 86, 239–246.Google Scholar
Huang, Q. X., Hsam, S. L. K., Zeller, F. J., Wenzel, G. & Mohler, V. (2000). Molecular mapping of the wheat powdery mildew resistance gene Pm24 and marker validation for molecular breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101, 407–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. G. & Clifford, B. C. (1983). Cereal Diseases. Their Pathology and Control, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley Sons.Google Scholar
Juroszek, P. & von Tiedemann, A. (2013). Climate change and potential future risks through wheat diseases: a review. European Journal of Plant Pathology 136, 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, M. A., Trevathan, L. E. & Robbins, J. T. (1997). Quantitative relationship between leaf rust and wheat yield in Mississippi. Plant Disease 81, 769–772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lackermann, K. V., Conley, S. P., Gaska, J. M., Martinka, M. J. & Esker, P. D. (2011). Effect of location, cultivar, and diseases on grain yield of soft red winter wheat in Wisconsin. Plant Disease 95, 1401–1406.Google Scholar
Li, N., Jia, S. F., Wang, X. N., Duan, X. Y., Zhou, Y. L., Wang, Z. H. & Lu, G. D. (2012). The effect of wheat mixtures on the powdery mildew disease and some yield components. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 11, 611–620.Google Scholar
Li, Q., Bian, C. Y., Liu, X. H., Ma, C. J. & Liu, Q. R. (2015). Winter wheat grain yield and water use efficiency in wide-precision planting pattern under deficit irrigation in North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management 153, 71–76.Google Scholar
Liu, N., Gong, G. S., Zhang, M., Zhou, Y., Chen, Z. X., Yang, J. Z., Chen, H. B., Wang, X. G., Lei, Y. & Liu, K. (2012). Over-summering of wheat powdery mildew in Sichuan Province, China. Crop Protection 34, 112–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, N., Lei, Y., Gong, G. S., Zhang, M., Wang, X., Zhou, Y., Qi, X. B., Chen, H. B., Yang, J. Z., Chang, X. L. & Liu, K. (2015). Temporal and spatial dynamics of wheat powdery mildew in Sichuan Province, China. Crop Protection 74, 150–157.Google Scholar
Lobell, D. B., Schlenker, W. & Costa-Roberts, J. (2011). Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 333, 616–620.Google Scholar
Lopez, J. A., Rojas, K. & Swart, J. (2015). The economics of foliar fungicide applications in winter wheat in Northeast Texas. Crop Protection 67, 35–42.Google Scholar
Luo, P. G., Luo, H. Y., Chang, Z. L., Zhang, H. Y., Zhang, M. & Ren, Z. L. (2009). Characterization and chromosomal location of Pm40 in common wheat: a new gene for resistance to powdery mildew derived from Elytrigiaintermedium . Theoretical and Applied Genetics 118, 1059–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchan, V. M. & Kranz, J. (1986). Studies on the effect of rain on the infection of wheat by Erysiphe graminis DC. f. sp. tritici Marchal. Zeitschrift Fur Pflanzenkrankheiten Und Pflanzenschutz. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 93, 255–270.Google Scholar
Moslonka-Lefebvre, M., Finley, A., Dorigatti, I., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Harwood, T., Jeger, M. J., Xu, X., Holdenrieder, O. & Pautasso, M. (2011). Networks in plant epidemiology: from genes to landscapes, countries, and continents. Phytopathology 101, 392–403.Google Scholar
Pautasso, M., Döring, T. F., Garbelotto, M., Pellis, L. & Jeger, M. J. (2012). Impacts of climate change on plant diseases opinions and trends. European Journal of Plant Pathology 133, 295–313.Google Scholar
Pretty, J. (2008). Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363, 447–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ransom, J. K. & McMullen, M. V. (2008). Yield and disease control on hard winter wheat cultivars with foliar fungicides. Agronomy Journal 100, 1130–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roos, J., Hopkins, R., Kvarnheden, A. & Dixelius, C. (2011). The impact of global warming on plant diseases and insect vectors in Sweden. European Journal of Plant Pathology 129, 9–19.Google Scholar
Savary, S., Mila, A., Willocquet, L., Esker, P. D., Carisse, O. & McRoberts, N. (2011 a). Risk factors for crop health under global change and agricultural shifts: a framework of analyses using rice in tropical and subtropical Asia as a model. Phytopathology 101, 696–709.Google Scholar
Savary, S., Nelson, A., Sparks, A. H., Willocquet, L., Duveiller, E., Mahuku, G., Forbes, G., Garrett, K. A., Hodson, D., Padgham, J., Pande, S., Sharma, M., Yuen, J. & Djurle, A. (2011 b). International agricultural research tackling the effect of global and climate changes on disease in the developing world. Plant Disease 95, 1204–1216.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. W. & Osborne, T. M. (2011). Geographic distribution of plant pathogens in response to climate change. Plant Pathology 60, 31–43.Google Scholar
Tao, F. L., Zhang, Z., Xiao, D. P., Zhang, S., Rötter, R. P., Shi, W. J., Liu, Y. J., Wang, M., Liu, F. S. & Zhang, H. (2014). Responses of wheat growth and yield to climate change in different climate zones of China, 1981–2009. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 189–190, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Te Beest, D. E., Paveley, N. D., Shaw, M. W. & Van Den Bosch, F. (2008). Disease-weather relationships for powdery mildew and yellow rust on winter wheat. Phytopathology 98, 609–617.Google Scholar
Troch, V., Audenaert, K., Vanheule, A., Bekaert, B., Höfte, M. & Haesaert, G. (2013). Evaluation of resistance to powdery mildew in triticale seedlings and adult plants. Plant Disease 97, 410–417.Google Scholar
Van Drooge, H. L., Groeneveld, C. N. & Schipper, H. J. (2001). Data on application frequency of pesticide for risk assessment purposes. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 45 (Suppl. 1), S95–S101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vechet, L. (2012). Incidence and development of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici) in the Czech Republic in the years 1999–2010 and race spectrum of this population. Journal of Life Science 6, 786–793.Google Scholar
Verreet, J. A., Klink, H. & Hoffmann, G. M. (2000). Regional monitoring for disease prediction and optimization of plant protection measures: the IPM wheat model. Plant Disease 84, 816–826.Google Scholar
Volk, T., Epke, K., Gerstner, V., Leuthner, C., Rotterdam, A., Johnen, A. & Richthnfen, J. S. V. (2010). Klimawandel in NordrheinWestfalen. Auswirkungen auf Schädlinge und PilzkrankheitenwichtigerAckerbaukulturen. Münster, Germany: proPlantGmbH (InGerman).Google Scholar
Wang, Z. L., Li, L. H., He, Z. H., Duan, X. Y., Zhou, Y. L., Chen, X. M., Lillemo, M., Singh, R. P., Wang, H. & Xia, X. C. (2005). Seedling and adult plant resistance to powdery mildew in Chinese bread wheat cultivars and lines. Plant Disease 89, 457–463.Google Scholar
West, J. S., Townsend, J. A., Stevens, M. & Fitt, B. D. L. (2012). Comparative biology of different plant pathogens to estimate effects of climate change on crop diseases in Europe. European Journal of Plant Pathology 133, 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiese, M. V. (1987). Compendium of Wheat Diseases, 2nd edn. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society.Google Scholar
Wiik, L. & Ewaldz, T. (2009). Impact of temperature and precipitation on yield and plant diseases of winter wheat in southern Sweden 1983–2007. Crop Protection 28, 952–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1.The location of the study area. LN, Liaoning; BJ, Beijing; TJ, Tianjin; HB, Hebei; HN, Henan; SD, Shandong; SX, Shanxi; SHX, Shaanxi; GS, Gansu; XJ, Xinjiang; JS, Jiangsu; AH, Anhui; SH, Shanghai; ZJ, Zhejiang; HUB, Hubei; CQ, Chongqing; SC, Sichuan; GZ, Guizhou; YN, Yunnan.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.The mean occurrence area rate for the study regions during the study period. N, entire wheat region of China; SH, Shanghai; YN, Yunnan; BJ, Beijing; SC, Sichuan; TJ, Tianjin; AH, Anhui; SD, Shandong; SX, Shanxi; XJ, Xinjiang; JS, Jiangsu; HB, Hebei; HN, Henan; ZJ, Zhejiang; HUB, Hubei; GS, Gansu; GZ, Guizhou; LN, Liaoning; CQ, Chongqing; SHX, Shaanxi.

Figure 2

Fig. 3.The climate tendency for the study regions during the whole study period. T, daily mean temperature; Tm, maximum temperature; Tn, minimum temperature; H, relative humidity; Rd, number of rainy days; Hrd, number of heavy rainfall days; W, wind speed; P, precipitation range; Sd, sunshine duration; N, entire wheat region of China; SH, Shanghai; YN, Yunnan; BJ, Beijing; SC, Sichuan; TJ, Tianjin; AH, Anhui; SD, Shandong; SX, Shanxi; XJ, Xinjiang; JS, Jiangsu; HB, Hebei; HN, Henan; ZJ, Zhejiang; HUB, Hubei; GS, Gansu; GZ, Guizhou; LN, Liaoning; CQ, Chongqing; SHX, Shaanxi.

Figure 3

Fig. 4.The mean yield loss (%) of wheat caused by occurrence area rate for the study regions during the study period. N, entire wheat region of China; SH, Shanghai; YN, Yunnan; BJ, Beijing; SC, Sichuan; TJ, Tianjin; AH, Anhui; SD, Shandong; SX, Shanxi; XJ, Xinjiang; JS, Jiangsu; HB, Hebei; HN, Henan; ZJ, Zhejiang; HUB, Hubei; GS, Gansu; GZ, Guizhou; LN, Liaoning; CQ, Chongqing; SHX, Shaanxi.

Figure 4

Table 1.Correlation coefficients between the first differences value of yield and climatic factors at P < 0·05 during the whole study period (1981–2010) and each individual time period (1981–1990, 1991–2000 and 2001–2010)

Figure 5

Table 2.Multiple linear regressions analysis of the first differences in occurrence area rate and climate factors at P < 0·05 during the whole study period and each individual time period

Figure 6

Table 3.Occurrence area rate (OAR) change, the contribution of climate driven and non-climate driven OAR changes during the whole study period and each individual time period