Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T06:51:39.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on the musculature and isolated muscle fibres of the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2003

D. KUMAR
Affiliation:
Parasite Proteomics and Therapeutics Research Group, School of Biology and Biochemistry, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar – 243 122 (UP), India
J. G. McGEOWN
Affiliation:
Smooth Muscle Research Group, Department of Physiology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland
O. REYNOSO-DUCOING
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico 04510
J. R. AMBROSIO
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico 04510
I. FAIRWEATHER
Affiliation:
Parasite Proteomics and Therapeutics Research Group, School of Biology and Biochemistry, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica relies on a well-developed muscular system, not only for attachment, but for many aspects of its biology. Despite this, little is known about the system beyond the gross organization of the main somatic muscle layers. In the present study, a range of techniques have been applied to F. hepatica in order to understand more about various aspects of muscle organization, biochemistry (in terms of muscle proteins) and identity of isolated muscle fibres. Scanning electron microscopy has provided a direct visualization in situ of the somatic muscle layers and the organization of the muscle fibres within the ventral sucker. The muscle bundles contributing to the main somatic muscle layers are made up of up to 10 individual muscle fibres. Phalloidin staining for actin, in conjunction with confocal microscopy, confirmed the presence of 2 main somatic muscle layers (outer circular, inner longitudinal), beneath which lies a third layer of oblique muscle fibres. The use of propidium iodide in combination with phalloidin staining for actin demonstrated that the cell bodies associated with the 2 main somatic muscle layers are situated beneath the longitudinal muscle layer and are connected to their respective muscle fibres by short cytoplasmic processes. Myosin immunoreactivity was demonstrated in the somatic muscle layers and in the muscle layers surrounding various organ systems within the fluke. Double labelling for actin and myosin confirmed the co-localization of the 2 muscle proteins in the muscle fibres of the ventral sucker. Muscle fibres from the somatic muscle layers and the ventral sucker have been isolated and images obtained with phase-contrast microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The muscle fibres contain actin and myosin, but lack a nucleus, the connection with the cell body having been broken during the isolation procedure.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2003 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Scanning electron micrographs (SEMs) of adult fluke preparations. (A) Potassium hydroxide/collagenase treatment, showing removal of the tegument and basal lamina to expose the outer circular muscle bundles (CM) and underlying longitudinal muscle layer (LM). A portion of the basal lamina (BL) remains and an empty spine socket (arrow) is visible. (B) Potassium hydroxide/collagenase treatment, showing muscle bundles in the longitudinal muscle layer. Each bundle takes the form of a flat strip or ribbon of individual muscle fibres. (C) Potassium hydroxide/collagenase treatment, showing the end of one muscle strip (large arrow) where it overlaps with another muscle strip (small arrow). (D) Thick tissue section showing the circular muscle layer (CM) beneath the tegument (T). Immediately below the circular layer is the longitudinal muscle layer (LM) and beneath the latter bundles of diagonal or oblique muscle fibres (DM) are also evident. (E) SEM of 2 somatic muscle fibres butt-joined to each other at their ends (large arrow), giving the impression of an abnormally elongated fibre. A possible cell body (small arrow) is attached to one of the muscle fibres. (F) SEM of a somatic muscle fibre that is tapered at one end and rounded at the other. A possible cell body (arrow) is attached to the fibre. (G) SEM of 2 somatic muscle fibres entwined around each other to give the impression of a bifurcated muscle fibre. (H) SEM of a clump of incompletely separated muscle fibres.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (A) Transmission electron micrograph of muscle fibres (large arrows). The fibres are composed of thick and thin myofilaments and are separated from each other by interstitial material. The end of one muscle muscle fibre is seen to be closely apposed to an adjacent muscle fibre (small arrows). (B) Phase-contrast image of an isolated somatic muscle fibre, showing its slightly-flexed, spindle-like shape, with tapering at both ends. (C) Phase-contrast image of an isolated somatic muscle fibre, showing its elongated, spindle-like shape. (D) Light micrograph of a section stained with toluidine blue, showing a muscle cell body (arrow) connected to a muscle fibre belonging to a muscle bundle in the diagonal muscle layer.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Scanning electron micrographs (SEMs) of muscle preparations from the ventral sucker. (A) SEM of the ventral sucker following partial digestion. The muscle bundles (arrows) are seen to have a circumferential organization around the inner lining of the sucker. (B) Higher power SEM of the muscle bundles (large arrows), showing them to be composed of a number of muscle fibres. Cell bodies (small arrows) are associated with the muscle bundles. (C) High-power SEM of a muscle cell body (large arrow), showing its connection with its muscle fibre (small arrow), which forms part of a muscle bundle. (D) SEM of an isolated muscle fibre showing its elongated, tapered shape. (E) SEM of an isolated muscle fibre showing a more squat, spindle-like shape.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. (A–E) CSLM images from a series taken at 1 μm intervals of a 3-week-old juvenile fluke double-stained with FITC-phalloidin (green) for actin and propidium iodide (red) for cell bodies. (A) Mainly shows muscle bundles belonging to the circular muscle layer. (B) Mainly shows muscle bundles belonging to the longitudinal muscle layer. (C) Image taken just below the longitudinal muscle layer. Muscle bundles of the diagonal muscle layer (large arrows) are evident and a number of muscle cell bodies (small arrow) are present. (D) Muscle bundles belonging to the diagonal muscle layer (large arrows) are evident, together with a larger number of cell bodies (small arrows) at this greater depth in the fluke. (E) Shows a large number of cell bodies interspersed with diagonal muscle bundles. From the muscle cell body emerges a short extension (small arrow) that connects with muscle fibres (large arrow) belonging to a muscle bundle. (F) Confocal scanning laser micrograph (CSLM) of a 3-week-old juvenile fluke double-stained with FITC-phalloidin (green) and propidium iodide (red). Labelling for propidium iodide is confined to the cell bodies (small arrows). Muscle fibres stained for actin (large arrows) extend away from the cell bodies. On occasion (arrowhead), it appears that more than 1 muscle fibre is associated with a single cell body. (G) CSLM of partially digested thick tissue section of an adult fluke, double-stained with FITC-phalloidin and propidium iodide. Note absence of cell bodies. (H) CSLM of an isolated somatic muscle fibre (small arrow) stained with FITC-phalloidin to show labelling for actin. Alongside the fibre is a much larger and apparently ‘frayed’ or ‘bifurcated’ muscle fibre (large arrow). It probably represents a group of incompletely digested muscle fibres.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Light micrographs of myosin immunostaining in cryostat sections of an adult fluke. (A) Section through the oral cone region showing myosin-immunoreactivity (IR) in the oral sucker (OS), uterus (U) and subtegumental muscle layers (arrows). (B) Section through the oral sucker showing myosin-IR in the muscle fibres (arrows) belonging to the sucker. (C) Micrograph showing myosin-IR in the 2 main subtegumental muscle layers (outer circular and inner longitudinal) (large arrows) and in the muscle bundles belonging to the diagonal muscle layers (small arrows). (D) High-power micrograph of myosin-IR in the outer circular (CM) and inner longitudinal (LM) muscle layers. Immunolabelling for myosin is also evident in the diagonal muscle fibres (DM). (E) Section showing myosin-IR in the muscle tissue (arrows) surrounding the ovary (OV). (F) Section showing myosin-IR in the muscle tissue (arrows) surrounding the base of the gut (G).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Confocal scanning laser micrographs (CSLMs) of a cryostat section of the ventral sucker of an adult fluke. The section was double-labelled with TRITC-phalloidin for actin and anti-myosin antibody which was visualized using FITC-labelled secondary antibody. The micrographs were taken at the same magnification. (A) TRITC-phalloidin staining of actin in the muscle fibres (arrows) belonging to the ventral sucker. (B) Myosin-IR in the same muscle fibres (arrows). (C) Co-localization of actin- and myosin-immunostaining in the muscle fibres (arrows) belonging to the ventral sucker.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Detection of myosin in extracts of Fasciola hepatica. Parasite samples were analysed using SDS–PAGE electrophoresis and Coomassie blue staining (lane 2) and Western blot chemiluminescence treatment (lane 3). Lyophilized powder was dissolved in filamentous protein extraction solution (lane 2). Recovered myosin was recognized by the anti-Taenia solium myosin antibody (arrow, lane 3). Pre-stained molecular weight standards are in lane 1.