Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:03:23.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamics of matrix metalloproteinases and procollagen type-1 N-terminal propeptide following right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction: the protective mechanism of restrictive physiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2026

Mehmet Aslan*
Affiliation:
Cardiyovasculer Surgery, Ministry of Health Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University Alanya Education and Rese, Türkiye
Onur Benli
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Surgery, Cukurova Universitesi, Türkiye
Ugur Gocen
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ortadogu Private Health Hospital, Türkiye
Atakan Atalay
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Ankara City Hospital Cardiovascular Hospital, Türkiye
Murat Yüksel
Affiliation:
Ortadogu Private Health Hospital, Türkiye
Hakan Poyrazoglu
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Private Medline Adana Hospital, Türkiye
Mehmet Sah Topcuoglu
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Türkiye
Hafize Yaliniz
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cukurova Universitesi Tip Fakultesi, Türkiye
Sevcan Erdem
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Türkiye
Orhan Salih
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cukurova Universitesi Tip Fakultesi, Türkiye
*
Corresponding author: Mehmet Aslan; Email: mehmetaslan81@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction frequently leads to long-term pulmonary failure and ventricular dilation. This study aims to investigate the dynamics of matrix metalloproteinase-2, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and procollagen type-1 N-terminal propeptide in predicting postoperative remodelling and to evaluate the “protective” potential of restrictive right ventricular physiology.

Methods:

This prospective comparative cohort study included 20 patients undergoing right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction (Research Group) and 20 patients undergoing atrial or ventricular septal defect repair via transatrial approach (Control Group). Biomarker levels were measured using ELISA at preoperative, early postoperative (24–48 hours), and 6-month intervals. Right ventricular geometry was assessed with cross-sectional snapshots at 6 months and 10 years. Right ventricular dilation was defined as right ventricular end-diastolic volume index > 150 ml/m2 or diameter z-score > 2, while preserved geometry was defined as right ventricular end-diastolic volume index < 100 ml/m2 or diameter z-score < 1.5.

Results:

Early postoperative biomarker increases were similar (p = 0.310) but differed significantly at 6 months. In the study group, matrix metalloproteinase-2 (p < 0.001) and procollagen type-1 N-terminal propeptide (p = 0.001) levels remained significantly elevated, independent of pulmonary regurgitation severity (p > 0.05). Ten years later, restrictive physiology was observed in 10 patients (50%), representing a progression compared to the 8 patients identified at 6 months.

Conclusion:

Persistent elevation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and procollagen type-1 N-terminal propeptide reflects an active “remodeling” process. Restrictive physiology is associated with the “Biological Banding” mechanism. By increasing myocardial stiffness, this adaptive process is linked to protecting the right ventricle from irreversible dilation under chronic volume overload.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Longitudinal dynamics of myocardial remodelling biomarkers. (a) Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) levels (pg/ml). (b) Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels (ng/ml). (c) Procollagen type-1 N-terminal propeptide (PINP) levels (pg/ml). Data for the study (n = 20) and control (n = 20) groups are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post-hoc multiple comparisons . Asterisks (*) denote a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the study and control groups at the specific time point.

Figure 1

Table 1. Demographic data and biochemical biomarker levels across study periods

Figure 2

Figure 2. Temporal changes in serum MMP-2, MMP-9, and PINP levels across study periods. The graph illustrates the biochemical profile of the study group (n = 20, blue) and control group (n = 20, red) at preoperative (T0), early postoperative (T1: 24–48 hours), and late postoperative (T2: 6th month) stages. Note the significant divergence at the 6th month, where MMP-2 and PINP levels remain elevated in the study group despite the resolution of the acute surgical trauma. Data Presentation: Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical significance: (*) denotes p < 0.05$ between groups; (†) denotes p < 0.05 compared to T0 within the group (Repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test). Abbreviations: MMP = matrix metalloproteinase; PINP = Procollagen Type-1 N-terminal Propeptide.

Figure 3

Table 2. 10-Year follow-up outcomes of the study group (n = 20) stratified by restrictive physiology status

Figure 4

Table 3. Comparison of postoperative 6th-month biomarker levels according to pulmonary regurgitation severity within the study group (n = 20)

Figure 5

Table 4. Echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of the study group at the postoperative 6th month (n = 20)

Figure 6

Figure 3. Correlation between 6th-month biomarker activity and 10-year right ventricular (RV) remodelling. Scatter plot demonstrating the relationship between 6th-month serum PINP (pg/ml) levels and the 10-year right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI, ml/m2). Clinical insight: patients who developed restrictive physiology (n = 10, red circles) exhibit higher biomarker levels at 6 months, which strongly correlates with preserved RV geometry (RVEDVI < 100 ml/m2) at the 10-year follow-up. In contrast, the non-restrictive group (n = 10, blue squares) shows lower biochemical activity and a higher risk of pathological RV dilatation (>150 ml/m2). Statistical analysis: Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and p-values are indicated on the chart. The dashed line represents the threshold for RV dilatation.

Figure 7

Figure 4. Comparative analysis of RV geometry based on restrictive physiology status. Grouped scatter plot (Column scatter) comparing (a) MMP-2 and (b) RVEDVI values between patients with and without restrictive physiology. Observation: The presence of late-diastolic antegrade pulmonary flow (Restrictive physiology) acts as a “mechanical constraint,” preventing progressive RV expansion. This protective effect is biochemically mirrored by significantly higher MMP-2 and PINP levels at the 6th month (p < 0.05). Data presentation: each point represents an individual patient. Horizontal lines indicate the median and interquartile range (IQR). Statistical analysis: Inter-group comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact test for categorical geometry data and Mann–Whitney U-test for continuous biomarker data.