Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T07:21:59.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ionic composition of terrestrial surface waters in Maritime Antarctic and the processes involved in formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2014

Arkadiusz Nędzarek*
Affiliation:
Department of Aquatic Sozology, West Pomeranian University of Technology, K. Królewicza 4, 71-550, Szczecin, Poland Department of Antarctic Biology, Polish Academy of Science, Ustrzycka 10-12, 02-141 Warsaw, Poland
Agnieszka Tórz
Affiliation:
Department of Antarctic Biology, Polish Academy of Science, Ustrzycka 10-12, 02-141 Warsaw, Poland
Joanna Podlasińska
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Protection and Management, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Słowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The qualitative and quantitative composition of major ions and nutrient compounds in surface waters and soils of the west coast of Admiralty Bay (King George Island, West Antarctica) was investigated together with the effect of soil-forming processes and atmospheric precipitation on the ionic composition of surface waters. In the water bodies studied, Cl- and Na+ were dominant major ions (average concentrations: 1102.2 and 930.9 μM, respectively). Average concentrations of the other major anions ranged from 2.80 μM (F-) to 81.64 μM (SO4 2-) and major cations ranged from 12.46 μM (K+) to 130.76 μM (Mg2+). Average concentrations of total reactive phosphorus, N-NO2 -, N-NO3 - and N-NH4 + amounted to 1.374, 0.410, 6.299 and 1.490 μM, respectively. Average concentrations of Ca, Mg, Na, K, N and P in the surface layer of the soil equalled 16.8, 15.9, 6.4, 3.6, 0.646 and 0.744 g kg-1, respectively. The calculated Na+/Cl-, Ca2+/Mg2+, Ca2+/Na+ and HCO3 -/Cl- ratios revealed that atmospheric precipitation was the main source of major ions. We conclude that the ionic composition of the waters of the western coast of Admiralty Bay differ from surface waters of Continental Antarctica.

Information

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Overview of the study area indicating sites where soil samples (1–18) and water samples from shallow ponds and streams were collected (C1 & C2=Czech Creek, DWR=drinking water reservoir, E1 & E2=stream flowing along the border of Ecology Glacier, LW=Lake Wujka, O1–O3=Ornithologists Creek, P1 & P2=Petrified Forest Creek, V1 & V2=Vanishing Creek, W1 & W2=stream flowing across the Wróbel Valley).

Figure 1

Table I Characteristics of the water bodies on Thomas Point Oasis.

Figure 2

Table II Mean (standard deviation) ion concentrations (μM), total dissolved solids (TDS, ppm), conductivity (μS cm-1) and pH in the water samples from Thomas Point Oasis.

Figure 3

Table III Linear correlation for relationships between the determined hydrochemical indicators and distance in the streams

Figure 4

Table IV Linear correlation for relationships between the determined hydrochemical indicators in the drinking water reservoir and Lake Wujka.

Figure 5

Fig. 2 Seasonal variability of selected ions (μM) and conductivity (μS cm-1). J=January, F=February, M=March.

Figure 6

Table V Ratios determined for selected indicators of the water samples.

Figure 7

Fig. 3 Metals in the soil of Thomas Point Oasis.

Figure 8

Fig. 4 Phosphorus and nitrogen content in the soil of Thomas Point Oasis.

Figure 9

Fig. 5 Horizontal variability of Ca, Mg, K, Na, P (g kg-1) and N (%) concentrations in the surface layer of soil in Thomas Point Oasis.

Figure 10

Table VI Correlations between the indicators determined for water samples from streams and for soil samples.

Figure 11

Fig. 6 A Gibbs plot comparing the formation of water bodies at Thomas Point Oasis (1) and in the McMurdo Dry Valleys (2; after Green et al.1988). Solid line is envelope of world surface water. Na and Na+Ca concentrations are mg dm-3.

Figure 12

Fig. 7 Triangle plots (mole percent) giving the composition of surface waters in Thomas Point Oasis (1), average world rivers (2) and the McMurdo Dry Valleys (3; after Green et al.1988).

Figure 13

Fig. 8 A comparison of Na+ (μM) concentrations in water bodies of Maritime and Continental Antarctica. KGI=King George Island (this study), LI=Livingston Island (Toro et al.2007), MMDV=McMurdo Dry Valleys (Green et al.1988), OR=Onyx River (Green et al.2005), WTV=Wright and Taylor valleys (Stumpf et al.2012).