Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T18:14:30.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Environmental effects on blue shark (Prionace glauca) and oilfish (Ruvettus pretiosus) distribution based on fishery-dependent data from the eastern Mediterranean Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2010

Dimitrios Damalas*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Section of Zoology–Marine Biology, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Ilissia, Athens 15784, Greece
Persefoni Megalofonou
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Section of Zoology–Marine Biology, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Ilissia, Athens 15784, Greece
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: D. Damalas, Department of Biology, Section of Zoology–Marine Biology, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Ilissia, Athens 15784, Greece email: ddamalas@biol.uoa.gr; shark@ath.hcmr.gr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Blue sharks (Prionace glauca) and oilfish (Ruvettus pretiosus) are frequently caught incidentally in the swordfish surface drifting longline fishery of the eastern Mediterranean Sea. An information theoretic generalized additive model approach, modelling separately: (1) the probability of making a catch; and (2) the positive catch rates, suggested the presence of intra-annual variations in their abundance and revealed interesting associations with some environmental features. Blue sharks were more frequently encountered during late summer in cool water masses. However, the likelihood of making a larger catch peaked in warmer waters through late spring in the vicinity of land. Occurrences of blue sharks were more frequent to the south-west (Ionian Sea), while positive catch rates were higher in the eastern-most regions (Levantine). Oilfish occurrences, as well as catch rates, were always above average to the east. Intra-annual variation was analogous to that of blue sharks. The species showed a preference for cooler water bodies and its distribution was strongly dictated by the lunar cycle. Annual time series showed a decreasing trend of blue sharks abundance. Catch rates for both species depended on fishing gear configuration. Deeper settings (>20 m), more resilient lines and use of fish attractant light-sticks increased the probability of capturing a fish.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the studied area with spatial distribution of fishing effort (top), catch per unit of effort (CPUE) of blue shark (middle) and CPUE of oilfish (bottom) 1998–2005 and 2003–2005 in the eastern Mediterranean Sea (Note: spatial resolution of fishing effort is 1/2 of a degree; values refer to the whole study period and not individual fishing sets).

Figure 1

Table 1. Number of ports, vessels, fishing sets, hooks deployed, blue sharks, oilfish and swordfish caught by fishing gear in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, during the period 1998–2001 and 2003–2005 (ports and vessels overlap between fishing gears).

Figure 2

Table 2. Summary of environmental parameters specifications included in the analyses.

Figure 3

Table 3. The set of candidate models.

Figure 4

Table 4. Effort (thousands of hooks), number of fish captured, and nominal catch per unit of effort (CPUE) values (number of fish/1000 hooks) by fishing gear and month for blue sharks and oilfish caught in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, during the period 1998–2001 and 2003–2005.

Figure 5

Fig. 2. Generalized additive model (GAM) derived effects of the investigated parameters on the Delta-binomial probability of encountering blue sharks. Dashed lines indicate 2 standard errors above and below the estimates. Relative density of data points is shown by the ‘rug’ on the x-axis.

Figure 6

Fig. 3. Generalized additive model (GAM) derived effects of the investigated parameters on the Delta-Gaussian (log) probability of positive blue shark catch rates. Dashed lines indicate 2 standard errors above and below the estimates. Relative density of data points is shown by the ‘rug’ on the x-axis.

Figure 7

Table 5. Summarized results of the ‘best’ models selected for the presence–absence and positive catch rates data regarding blue shark and oilfish caught in the swordfish longline fishery of the Mediterranean Sea. Pr(F) refers to the P values from an ANOVA F-ratio test; Edf are the estimated degrees of freedom.

Figure 8

Fig. 4. Generalized additive model (GAM) derived effects of the investigated parameters on the Delta-binomial probability of encountering oilfish. Dashed lines indicate 2 standard errors above and below the estimates. Relative density of data points is shown by the ‘rug’ on the x-axis.

Figure 9

Fig. 5. Generalized additive model (GAM) derived effects the investigated parameters on the Delta-Gamma (log) probability of positive oilfish catch rates. Dashed lines indicate 2 standard errors above and below the estimates. Relative density of data points is shown by the ‘rug’ on the x-axis.

Figure 10

Table 6. Synoptic table of the trends in the distribution of the studied species.

Figure 11

Fig. 6. Processing of oilfish caught in the eastern Mediterranean, sold as shark fillets in retail market.