Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:36:06.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phytochemicals and biofunctional properties of buckwheat: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2013

A. AHMED
Affiliation:
Department of Food Technology, Pir Mehr Ali Shah, Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan
N. KHALID*
Affiliation:
Department of Global Agricultural Sciences, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, 1-1-1, Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
A. AHMAD
Affiliation:
Department of Food Technology, Pir Mehr Ali Shah, Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan
N. A. ABBASI
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Pir Mehr Ali Shah, Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan
M. S. Z. LATIF
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Khawaja Muhammad Safdar Medical College, Sialkot, Pakistan
M. A. RANDHAWA
Affiliation:
National Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad-38040, Pakistan
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: nauman_khalid120@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A growing trend for nutraceutical and gluten-free cereal-based products highlights the need for development of new products. Buckwheat is one of the potential candidates for such products and the present paper reviews the functional and nutraceutical compounds present in common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) and tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum). The vital functional substances in buckwheat are flavonoids, phytosterols, fagopyrins, fagopyritols, phenolic compounds, resistant starch, dietary fibre, lignans, vitamins, minerals and antioxidants, which make it a highly active biological pseudocereal. Cholesterol-lowering effects that lessen the problems of constipation and obesity are important health benefits that can be achieved through the functional substances of buckwheat.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Classification of buckwheat.

Figure 1

Table 1. World's largest producers of buckwheat (production year 2011) (FAOSTAT 2013)

Figure 2

Table 2. Proximate composition (mg/g DW) of buckwheat flour, wheat flour and quinoa flour (Ogungbenle 2003; Lin et al. 2009; Qin et al. 2010)

Figure 3

Table 3. Comparison of buckwheat flour composition (m/g DW) with other commonly used cereals and pseudo-cereals (Bonafaccia & Fabjan 2003; Czerwiński et al. 2004; Vega-Gálvez et al. 2010)

Figure 4

Table 4. Fatty acid profile (mg/g) of tartary and common buckwheat (Mazza 1988; Tsuzuki et al. 1991; Becker 2008; Gulpinar et al. 2011)

Figure 5

Table 5. Essential amino acid composition (mg/g protein) of buckwheat, cereals, pseudo-cereals and egg (Radovic et al. 1999; Mendonça et al. 2009; Tang & Wang 2010; Vega-Gálvez et al. 2010)

Figure 6

Table 6. Mineral concentrations (mg/g) in buckwheat and milling fractions (Steadman et al. 2001b; Ikeda et al. 2006)

Figure 7

Table 7. Comparison of mineral composition (mg/g) of buckwheat flour with maize meal, semolina, wheat flour, soybean flour, quinoa flour and raw amaranth (Ranhotra et al. 1993; Edwardson 1995)

Figure 8

Table 8. Vitamin composition of common buckwheat (Wijngaard & Arendt 2006)

Figure 9

Fig. 2. Buckwheat starch micrographs from different origins adopted from Qian & Kuhn (1999).

Figure 10

Fig. 3. Important phenolic compounds in buckwheat: A, isorientin; B, orientin; C, rutin; D, vitexin (Verardo et al.2011).

Figure 11

Table 9. Rutin content (mg/g DW) in different parts of buckwheat (Park et al. 2004; Paulícková et al. 2004)

Figure 12

Table 10. Comparison of rutin content in leaves, stems and seeds of tartary buckwheat of different origins (Park et al. 2004)

Figure 13

Fig. 4. Fagopyritol A series present in buckwheat (Horbowicz et al.1998).

Figure 14

Fig. 5. Fagopyritol B series present in buckwheat (Horbowicz et al.1998).