Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T07:40:23.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are changes in atmospheric cleansing responsible for observed variations of impurity concentrations in ice cores?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Margareta E. Hansson*
Affiliation:
Stockholms Meteorologiska institutions universitet, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A simple model tests the effect on ice-core impurity concentrations of climate-induced changes in the physical conditions of the atmosphere influencing transport and deposition processes, while keeping source areas and production rates constant. The model results show that the increased glacial concentrations observed for most impurities can be explained entirely by changes in transport and deposition. No increase in source emission is necessary, however possible, to explain the ten-fold increase in impurity concentrations during the Last Glacial Maximum. This shows that the effect of dynamic changes in the atmosphere can be large and has to be taken into account before translating deposition records into emission records. The total impurity content in the global atmosphere during the glacial period was higher if dynamic changes in the atmosphere rather than source-emission changes were responsible for the variations observed in polar areas. This implies that a climate-forcing mechanism is to be found in the dynamics of the atmosphere, since the radiative properties of the atmosphere depend on the total content of impurities in the atmosphere. The effect on the climate can probably be compared with, although opposite in sign to, the present-day anthropogenic greenhouse forcing.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1995
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Top: the Renland ice-core S18O profile on a calculated time-scale; the marine isotope stages are indicated. Bottom: the Renland ice-core calcium profile; the 19th-century mean, value is indicated by a cross to the left.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. The relative airborne concentration against the ratio between the transit time and the residence time in the reference state (t*/τ*) for different ratios between the relative transit time and the relative residence time (n/k).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Model results of the relative concentration in the ice and the relative net deposition flux for four different t* / τ* ratios (2.5, 1.0, 0.5 and 0.1) with the same gradual change of the n/k ratio to 0.1 in stage 2 (δ18O = −31.3‰/). The 19th century (δ18O = −27.4‰) is the reference state.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Observed relative mean concentrations in the ice and relative mean total deposition fluxes for dust and nine ions in the Renland ice core. The 19th century (δ18O = −27.4‰) is the reference state. The other mean values are calculated for the climatic periods: Preboreal (δ18O = −28.0‰), Younger Dryas (−30.6‰), Alleröd Bölling (−29.0‰), stage 2 (−31.3‰), stage 3 (−30.2‰), stage 4 (−30.9‰), stage 5a–d (−29.0‰) and stage 5e (−25.8‰), respectively..