Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:38:12.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design and analysis of broadband circularly polarized compact planar antennas for 2.45 GHz RFID handheld reader applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2022

Niraj Agrawal
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, NIET, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201 306, India
Anil Kumar Gautam*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, G.B. Pant Engineering College, Pauri Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India
Karumudi Rambabu
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2V
*
Author for correspondence: Anil Kumar Gautam, E-mail: gautam1575@yahoo.co.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, an innovative design of a broadband circularly polarized compact planar antenna for RFID (radio frequency identification) receivers is presented. The suggested structure used the concept of slots loaded parasitic element printed underneath a coplanar waveguide-fed radiator to achieve the circularly polarized (CP) radiation and size reduction. A parasitic element loaded with F-slot and L-slot, and a window-type slotted ground plane was used to achieve resonance at 2.45 GHz with right-handed circularly polarized radiation for RFID handheld reader application. Experimental results confirmed that the designed antenna of size 16.5 × 14.8 × 1.6 mm3 attained a −10 dB impedance bandwidth of 15.8% (from 2.330 to 2.716 GHz) and 3 dB AR bandwidth of 3.43% (from 2.410 to 2.494 GHz). An axial ratio of 0.43 dB was achieved in the boresight of the antenna at the 2.45 GHz RFID band. The concept of electric field distribution on the antenna was used to elaborate the excitation of CP radiation in the antenna.

Information

Type
RFID and Sensors
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Table 1. Performance comparison of the similar antennas

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Schematic design of the proposed antenna: (a) side view, (b) top view, and (c) bottom view.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Evolution of the antenna design: (a) antenna 1, (b) antenna 2, (c) antenna 3, and (d) antenna 4.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Evolution of the proposed antenna: (a) simulated S11, (b) simulated axial ratio, and (c) real and imaginary input impedances.

Figure 4

Table 2. Detailed parametric dimensions marked in Fig. 1(b)

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Distributed E-field at 2.45 GHz for (a) antenna 1, (b) antenna 2, (c) antenna 3, (d) antenna 4, (e) and process for the genesis of orthogonal E-field components.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Distributed E-field at center frequency of 2.45 GHz for different times from wt = 0° to wt = 360°.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Simulated surface current distribution (a) at 2.45 GHz for antenna-2 and (b) at 2.45 GHz for the proposed design.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Progression of the proposed structure: (a) simulated S11 and (b) simulated 3 dB axial ratio.

Figure 9

Table 3. Performance of the designed antenna with variation of W3

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Progression of the proposed structure: (a) simulated S11 and (b) simulated 3 dB axial ratio.

Figure 11

Table 4. Performance of the designed antenna using variation of L11

Figure 12

Fig. 9. Simulated and measured (a) S11 and (b) AR frequency response of the designed antenna.

Figure 13

Fig. 10. Radiation patterns at x–z (ϕ = 0°) and y–z (ϕ = 90°) plane at 2.45 GHz: (a) simulated and measured results and (b) simulated results.

Figure 14

Fig. 11. (a) Simulated and measured AR as a function of θ. (b) Simulated radiation efficiency as a function of frequency.

Figure 15

Fig. 12. Simulated near-field (electric field intensity) against distance.