Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:34:59.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Marine Protected Areas: reserve effect or natural variability? The Patagonian octopus case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2012

Lorena P. Storero*
Affiliation:
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), San Antonio Oeste, Río Negro, Argentina Instituto de Biología Marina y Pesquera Almirante Storni (IBMPAS-UNCo), San Antonio Oeste, Río Negro, Argentina
Maite A. Narvarte
Affiliation:
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), San Antonio Oeste, Río Negro, Argentina Instituto de Biología Marina y Pesquera Almirante Storni (IBMPAS-UNCo), San Antonio Oeste, Río Negro, Argentina
Raúl A. González
Affiliation:
Instituto de Biología Marina y Pesquera Almirante Storni (IBMPAS-UNCo), San Antonio Oeste, Río Negro, Argentina
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: L.P. Storero, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), San Antonio Oeste, Río Negro, Argentina email: lorestorero@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Population characteristics can be influenced by specific factors of the habitat and the natural variability of populations can confuse the effect related to protected environments. This study compares the demographic characteristics of Octopus tehuelchus in three coastal environments: two Marine Protected Areas (San Antonio Bay (SAB) and Islote Lobos (IL)) and a traditional fishing zone (El Fuerte (EF)). Weight–frequency distributions, sex-ratio and recruitment were monthly compared between the three intertidal zones. Octopus tehuelchus was smaller in IL, where fishing intensity is lower or null, and reached the largest sizes in the main fishing area of EF and within SAB (where there is no regulation and a mid–high fishing intensity). The sex proportion in SAB and EF was 1:1 all along the year. Although the proportion of mature females in IL was higher, the highest recruitment was observed in EF (the traditional fishing ground). These new data suggest that previous studies, which reported that Marine Protected Areas have positive effects for O. tehuelchus populations, can no longer be supported, and highlight the importance of understanding and quantifying the magnitude and range of natural variability in each environment when assessing the effectiveness of Marine Protected Areas.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Study area and sampling sites: SAB, San Antonio Bay; EF, El Fuerte; IL, Islote Lobos.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Monthly weight–frequency distributions in the three study sites: SAB, San Antonio Bay; EF, El Fuerte; IL, Islote Lobos. Total number of octopuses is shown in parentheses.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Box-plot for male and female total weight (g): SAB, San Antonio Bay; EF, El Fuerte; IL, Islote Lobos. Different letters indicate significant differences (analysis of variance, Tukey's test P  <0.05). Values below each box indicate total number of octopuses analysed by sex and site.

Figure 3

Table 1. Result of the two-way analysis of variance to test for differences in total weight between sampling sites and sexes.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Monthly proportion of females: SAB, San Antonio Bay; EF, El Fuerte; IL, Islote Lobos. *, significant differences (Chi-square test, P  < 0.05); N, total number of octopuses (males and females) analysed by month and site. When N was lower than 30, the Chi-square test was not performed.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Mean number of juveniles and mature females caught by transect (300 m2). Standard deviations are not displayed to facilitate graph interpretation. SAB, San Antonio Bay; EF, El Fuerte; IL, Islote Lobos; N, number of transects (300 m2) carried out by site and season.

Figure 6

Table 2. Result of the two-way analysis of variance to test for differences in the number of juveniles caught by transect for the main recruitment season (spring), between years and sites.

Figure 7

Table 3. Juvenile per mature female ratio in the main recruitment season (spring). SAB, San Antonio Bay; EF, El Fuerte; IL, Islote Lobos.