Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:39:17.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultra-wideband elliptical patch antenna for microwave imaging of wood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2019

Tale Saeidi*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Tronoh, Perak, Malaysia
Idris Ismail
Affiliation:
Dept. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Tronoh, Perak, Malaysia
Wong Peng Wen
Affiliation:
Dept. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Tronoh, Perak, Malaysia
Adam R. H. Alhawari
Affiliation:
Dept. Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Najran University, Saudi Arabia
*
Author for correspondence: Tale Saeidi, E-mail: gs32772@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the design of an elliptical shape ultra-wide band antenna for imaging of wood. The antenna is constructed comprising an elliptical shape of patch loaded by a stub to resonate at lower bands, strip loading at the back, and chamfered ground. Despite having miniaturized dimensions of 20 mm × 20 mm, the proposed antenna shows better results compared to recent studies. The simulation results depict a good ultra-wide bandwidth from 2.68 to 16 GHz, and 18.2–20 GHz. Besides, the proposed antenna has two low-frequency bands at 0.89–0.92 and 1.52–1.62 GHz, maximum gain of 5.48 dB, and maximum directivity of 6.9 dBi. The measurement outcomes are performed in air, plywood, and high-density wood and show a good agreement with the simulated results done using electromagnetic simulator CST. In addition to that, the measurement results of S-parameters, transmitted and received signals show a good agreement with the simulated results. Besides, the measured results illustrate a good isolation and uniform illumination among arrays as well as the received signals' shapes do not change in different environments, but only the amplitude. Hence, the proposed antenna seems to be adequate for microwave imaging of wood.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Dielectric measurement of the samples.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Penetration in both high-density wood and plywood (in meter).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Front (a) and the ground view (b) of the proposed antenna.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Prototype of fabricated antenna and measurement in air and wood (a: high density wood, b: soft plywood, c: fabricated antenna (front and back).

Figure 4

Table 1. The final dimensions of the elliptical antenna

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Current distribution of antenna at 0.9 GHz (a) and 1.6 GHz (b).

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Current distribution for lower-end ((a) at 2.68 GHz) and higher-end ((b) at 16 GHz) of BW.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. UWB antenna system in time domain.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Measured and simulated reflection coefficient result of proposed antenna in air.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Simulated and measured radiation pattern in both E and H planes at 0.9–20 GHz.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Simulated and measured radiation efficiency.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Simulated and measured radiation gain.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Reflection coefficient result of the antenna for sensitivity to fabrication tolerance (gnd is the Ground layer, ver means vertical, hor is horizontal, and pat is the patch).

Figure 13

Fig. 13. Simulation setup (it has been followed by measurement setup and arrays 1–4 are moved based on the θ and the arrays 5–9 based on φ).

Figure 14

Fig. 14. Measured and simulated reflection coefficient result of proposed antenna in air and wood.

Figure 15

Fig. 15. Simulated and measured transmission response S21 in different environment.

Figure 16

Fig. 16. Reflection coefficient amplitude of each antenna in the presence of other antennas.

Figure 17

Fig. 17. Reflection coefficient amplitude result of antenna alone and at the presence of nine arrays (A1–A9).

Figure 18

Fig. 18. Amplitude of mutual couplings between antennas.

Figure 19

Fig. 19. Transmission coefficient (S21) phase of the antenna with the arrays around it (a: in phi direction, b: in theta direction).

Figure 20

Fig. 20. Transmitted pulse from the transmitter antenna.

Figure 21

Fig. 21. Received signals for simulated and measured in soft plywood, air, and high-density wood (φ = 0–90°).

Figure 22

Fig. 22. Received signals for simulated and measured in soft plywood, air and high-density wood (φ = 135° − 90°).

Figure 23

Fig. 23. Fidelity of the proposed antenna (%) in different degrees and environment.

Figure 24

Fig. 24. Simulated group delay in different thickness of wood.

Figure 25

Fig. 25. Near-field radiation intensity of the antenna.

Figure 26

Table 2. Comparison of the proposed design with previous similar works

Figure 27

Fig. 26. Image reconstruction setup.

Figure 28

Fig. 27. 3D image of the hollow in wood sample showed in Fig. 26.

Figure 29

Fig. 28. The transmission line dimensions (L, W).

Figure 30

Fig. 29. The patch dimensions (b, a).

Figure 31

Fig. 30. The length of the fifth length of the stub's optimization (L5).

Figure 32

Fig. 31. The ground length's optimization (Lg).

Figure 33

Table A1. A brief comparison between the microwave imaging and other methods