Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T01:16:37.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Free cyclitol unloading from seed coats on stem–leaf–pod explants of low-raffinose, low-stachyose, low-phytin soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2010

Suzanne M. Kosina
Affiliation:
Seed Biology, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY14853, USA
Steven R. Schnebly
Affiliation:
Pioneer Hi-Bred, A DuPont Business, 810 Sugar Grove Ave., Hwy44, Dallas Center, IA50063, USA
Ralph L. Obendorf*
Affiliation:
Seed Biology, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY14853, USA
*
*Correspondence Fax: +1-607-255-2644 Email: rlo1@cornell.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Raffinose, stachyose and phytin are undesirable compounds for soybean food and animal feed products. In seeds, raffinose and stachyose are believed to contribute to desiccation and cold stress tolerance. Thus, removal of these compounds from soybean by genetic mutation has resulted in a more commercially desirable composition, but potentially less physiologically viable seeds. In an effort to develop a method to improve viability and seed storability in soybean, stem–leaf–pod explants of three low raffinose, low stachyose lines, two of which were also low in phytin, and a check line were fed solutions containing d-chiro-inositol, myo-inositol or d-pinitol, free cyclitols which unload through the seed coat to the developing embryo where they accumulate as fagopyritols, galactinol and galactopinitols, respectively, during seed maturation. Increased galactopinitol and fagopyritol accumulation may substitute for the roles of raffinose and stachyose in low raffinose, stachyose and phytin seeds. Explants of all lines unloaded d-chiro-inositol, myo-inositol and d-pinitol. Fed d-chiro-inositol accumulated in leaf tissues demonstrating uptake into explants. Fed d-chiro-inositol and myo-inositol accumulated in pod wall and seed coat tissues of one or more lines. The results indicate that d-chiro-inositol was unloaded from the seed coat to the embryo in increased amounts after feeding. The potential use of increased maternal d-chiro-inositol for synthesis of fagopyritols in embryos to improve seed performance in low-stachyose and low-phytin soybean seeds is supported. The seed coat cup unloading of fed free cyclitols may provide a model system to test effective unloading of upregulated maternally synthesized cyclitols.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Figure 1 Proposed pathways for synthesis of cyclitols, cyclitol galactosides and RFOs (adapted from Ma et al., 2005). If an enzyme catalysing a reaction has not been identified, it is indicated as ‘(unknown)’. Some reactions may be reversible. The line encircles reactions that typically occur in embryonic tissues of maturing seeds. DP, degree of polymerization; gol, galactinol; GolS, galactinol synthase (EC 2.4.1.123); HK, hexokinase (EC 2.7.1.1); IMP, myo-inositol-phosphate monophosphatase (EC 3.1.3.25); IMT, myo-inositol 4-O-methyltransferase (EC 2.1.1.129); IPK, inositol polyphosphate kinases (including inositol-tetrakisphosphate 1-kinase, EC 2.7.1.134; inositol polyphosphate multikinase, EC 2.7.1.151; inositol pentakisphosphate 2-kinase EC 2.7.1.158); mI 3K, inositol 3-kinase (EC 2.7.1.64); MIPS, myo-inositol-phosphate synthase (EC 5.5.1.4); mips, mutant form of Mips gene (Gm mI 1-PS-1A, AY038802); myo-i, myo-inositol; RFS, raffinose synthase (EC 2.4.1.82); stc1, mutant form of Stc1 gene; STS, stachyose synthase (EC 2.4.1.67); STS?, stachyose synthase or similar enzyme but not confirmed experimentally; UDP, uridine diphosphate; UDP-gal, uridine diphosphate galactoside; UDPG-4′-epimerase, uridine diphosphate galactose 4′-epimerase (EC 5.1.3.2); UDPGPP, uridine diphosphate glucose/galactose pyrophosphorylase (EC 2.7.7.10). For chemical structures, see Obendorf (1997).

Figure 1

Table 1 Seed phenotypes of the soybean lines used

Figure 2

Figure 2 Diagram of the soybean explant system. Explants were prepared from plants at growth stage R5 by cutting at the base of the internode (stem) above and below the selected node. Each explant had one internode (stem), one node, one leaf and one pod containing three immature seeds at mid-seed fill and before the accumulation of RFO, fagopyritols and galactopinitols. The cut, basal end of the internode (stem) of each explant was placed in a 125-ml flask (one explant per flask) containing 100 ml of cyclitol solution or a control solution without cyclitols. Each solution was loaded into an explant through the cut stem and transported to the leaf by the transpiration stream and to the seed coat through the phloem. Seed coat cup unloading analysis was performed on the middle seed using the surgical method of removing the distal half of the seed coat and the entire embryo from the intact seed coat cup (Thorne and Rainbird, 1983; Ellis and Spanswick, 1987; Gomes et al., 2005; Kosina et al., 2009). Soluble carbohydrates were collected in water in the seed coat cup, dried, derivatized and analysed by gas chromatography. (See online for a colour version for this figure.)

Figure 3

Figure 3 Seed coat unloading. Explant seed coat cup unloading rates for d-chiro-inositol after feeding d-chiro-inositol (A, E, I, M), myo-inositol after feeding myo-inositol (B, F, J, N), d-pinitol after feeding d-pinitol (C, G, K, O), and sucrose after feeding a control solution without cyclitols (D, H, L, P) as a function of days of feeding (0–5) with pooled lines and unloading times (A–D); substrate feeding treatment [d-chiro-inositol (chiro), myo-inositol (myo), d-pinitol (pin), or control solution (cont)] with pooled lines and unloading times (E–H); line (LRS, LRSP1, LRSP2 and CHECK) with pooled unloading times and days 1–5 (I–L); and unloading time (0–30, 30–60, 60–90 and 90–120 min) with pooled lines and days (1–5) of feeding (M–P). Responses were pooled for days 1–5 (E–P). Bars not connected by the same letter are significantly different (P < 0.05) after a Tukey correction for multiple comparisons. In graphs I, J and K, an asterix (*) means the value after feeding cyclitols (solid bars) was significantly different (P < 0.05) compared to feeding a control solution without cyclitols (open bars) for each line.

Figure 4

Figure 4 Leaf soluble carbohydrates. Leaf disc (three times 1 cm− 2) contents (μg cm− 2 leaf area) of d-chiro-inositol after feeding d-chiro-inositol (A, E) to explants, myo-inositol after feeding myo-inositol (B, F) to explants, d-pinitol after feeding d-pinitol (C, G) to explants, and sucrose after feeding a control solution without cyclitols (D, H) to explants as a function of days (0–5) of feeding (A–H) or as a function of line [LRS, LRSP1 (P1), LRSP2 (P2) and CHECK (CK)] (E–H) (days 1–5 pooled). Solid bars represent the cyclitol feeding treatment and open bars represent the control feeding treatment without cyclitols. Bars not connected by the same letter are significantly different (P < 0.05) after a Tukey correction for multiple comparisons. In graphs E, F, and G, an asterix (*) means the value after feeding cyclitols (solid bars) was significantly different (P < 0.05) compared to feeding a control solution without cyclitols (open bars) for each line.

Figure 5

Figure 5 myo-Inositol conversion. d-chiro-Inositol contents in leaf blade (μg cm− 2 leaf area) (A), pod wall (mg g− 1 dry weight) (B), seed coat (mg g− 1 dry weight) (C) and cotyledon (mg g− 1 dry weight) (D) tissues after feeding myo-inositol (solid bars) or a control solution without cyclitols (open bars) to explants for 1–5 d as a function of line [LRS, LRSP1 (P1), LRSP2 (P2) and CHECK (CK)]. Bars not connected by the same letter are significantly different (P < 0.05) after a Tukey correction for multiple comparisons. In graph A, an asterix (*) means the value for d-chiro-inositol after feeding myo-inositol (solid bars) was significantly different (P < 0.05) compared to feeding a control solution without cyclitols (open bar) for LRS.

Figure 6

Figure 6 Pod and immature seed soluble carbohydrates. Pod wall (A–D), seed coat (E–H), cotyledon (I–L) and axis (M–P) contents (mg g− 1 dry weight) of d-chiro-inositol after feeding d-chiro-inositol (A, E, I, M) to explants for 1–5 d, myo-inositol after feeding myo-inositol (B, F, J, N) to explants for 1–5 d, d-pinitol after feeding d-pinitol (C, G, K, O) to explants for 1–5 d, and sucrose after feeding a control solution without cyclitols (D, H, L, P) to explants for 1–5 d as a function of line [LRS, LRSP1 (P1), LRSP2 (P2) and CHECK (CK)]. Solid bars represent the cyclitol feeding treatment and open bars represent the control feeding treatment without cyclitols. Bars not connected by the same letter are significantly different (P < 0.05) after a Tukey correction for multiple comparisons. In graphs A, B and F, an asterix (*) means the value after feeding cyclitols (solid bars) was significantly different (P < 0.05) compared to feeding a control solution without cyclitols (open bars) for each line.

Figure 7

Table 2 Summary of significant increases in contents of d-chiro-inositol in the different tissues after feeding a d-chiro-inositol solution, of myo-inositol after feeding a myo-inositol solution, and of d-pinitol after feeding a d-pinitol solution to LRS, LRSP1, LRSP2 and CHECK explants, compared to feeding a control solution without cyclitols. The seed coat cup unloading (Fig. 3), leaf blade (Fig. 4), pod wall (Fig. 6) and seed coat (Fig. 6) values were significantly higher than values after feeding a control solution without cyclitols