Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T20:11:17.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Functional separation of the senses is a requirement ofperception/action research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2001

Kipp McMichael  and
Geoffrey Bingham
Kipp McMichael
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408 kimcmich@indiana.edu gbingham@indiana.edu www.indiana.edu/~psych
Geoffrey Bingham
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408 kimcmich@indiana.edu gbingham@indiana.edu www.indiana.edu/~psych
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Stoffregen & Bardy's arguments against separation of the sensesfail to consider the functional differences between the kinds ofinformation potentially available in the structured energy arraysthat correspond to the traditional senses. Since mostperception/action research pursues a strategy of informationperturbation presupposing differential contributions from thevarious ambient arrays, the global array hypothesis can only beextended and tested by analyses that consider the functional aspectsalong which the senses can, in fact, be separated.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 227 - 228
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press