Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T06:44:29.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genotypic variation in the response to embryogenic callus induction and regeneration in Saccharum spontaneum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2021

Chunjia Li
Affiliation:
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Sugarcane Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kaiyuan 661699, China
Xujuan Li
Affiliation:
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Sugarcane Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kaiyuan 661699, China
Xiuqin Lin
Affiliation:
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Sugarcane Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kaiyuan 661699, China
Wei Qin
Affiliation:
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Sugarcane Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kaiyuan 661699, China
Xin Lu
Affiliation:
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Sugarcane Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kaiyuan 661699, China
Jun Mao
Affiliation:
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Sugarcane Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kaiyuan 661699, China
Xinlong Liu*
Affiliation:
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Sugarcane Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kaiyuan 661699, China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: lxlgood868@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Embryogenic callus induction and regeneration are useful in many aspects of plant biotechnology, especially in the functional characterization of economically important genes. However, in sugarcane, callus induction and regeneration vary across genotypes. Saccharum spontaneum is an important wild germplasm that confers disease resistance and stress tolerance to modern sugarcane cultivars, and its genome has been completely sequenced. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of genetic variations on embryogenic callus induction and regeneration in S. spontaneum and to screen genotypes having high tissue culture susceptibility. The study was performed using nine genotypes of S. spontaneum and the following five parameters were assessed to determine the response of genotypes to embryogenic callus induction and regeneration: callus induction, embryogenic callus ratio, embryogenic callus induction, embryonic callus regeneration and regeneration capacity. All the genotypes varied significantly (P < 0.01) in all the parameters, except for embryonic callus regeneration, which was high (>80%) for all the genotypes. High broad-sense heritability (86.1–96.8%) indicated that genetic differences are the major source of genotypic variations. Callus induction was found to be strongly positively correlated with embryogenic callus induction (r = 0.890, P < 0.01) and regeneration capacity (r = 0.881, P < 0.01). Among the nine tested genotypes, VN2 was found to be the most responsive to tissue culture and could therefore be used to characterize functional genes in S. spontaneum. We also suggested an approach with potential applications in facilitating the rapid identification of sugarcane genotypes susceptible to tissue culture.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of NIAB
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Three types of calli and differentiation of embryonic calli for Saccharum spontaneum genotypes. VN2 (a–d), YN2011-44 (e–h) and HNLS5 (i–j) were shown. Tissue culturing for induction and regeneration of the callus is described in the Materials and methods section. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Figure 1

Table 1. Response to embryogenic callus induction and regeneration of Saccharum spontaneum genotypes

Figure 2

Table 2. Correlations among tissue culture susceptibility parameters

Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Li et al. supplementary material(File)
File 15 KB