Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:31:35.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal maturation of a complete magmatic plumbing system at the Sierra de Velasco, Northwestern Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2020

Marcos Macchioli Grande*
Affiliation:
Centro Regional de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia Tecnológica de La Rioja (Provincia de La Rioja – UNLaR – SEGEMAR – UNCa – CONICET), Entre Ríos y Mendoza s/n, 5301 Anillaco, Argentina Instituto de Geología y Recursos Naturales, Centro de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica, Universidad Nacional de La Rioja (INGeReN – CENIIT – UNLaR), Avenida Gobernador Vernet y Apóstol Felipe, 5300 La Rioja, Argentina
Pablo Alasino
Affiliation:
Centro Regional de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia Tecnológica de La Rioja (Provincia de La Rioja – UNLaR – SEGEMAR – UNCa – CONICET), Entre Ríos y Mendoza s/n, 5301 Anillaco, Argentina Instituto de Geología y Recursos Naturales, Centro de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica, Universidad Nacional de La Rioja (INGeReN – CENIIT – UNLaR), Avenida Gobernador Vernet y Apóstol Felipe, 5300 La Rioja, Argentina
Juan Dahlquist
Affiliation:
Centro de investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra (CICTERRA – CONICET – UNC), Haya de la Torre s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, X5016CA Córdoba, Argentina
Matías Morales Cámera
Affiliation:
Centro de investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra (CICTERRA – CONICET – UNC), Haya de la Torre s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, X5016CA Córdoba, Argentina
Carmen Galindo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Mineralogía y Petrología, Facultad de Ciencias Geológicas, Instituto de Geociencias (IGEO, CSIC), Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Miguel Basei
Affiliation:
Instituto de Geociências da Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Lago 562, 05508-080 São Paulo, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Marcos Macchioli Grande, Email: mmacchioligrande@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The formation of magmatic plumbing systems in the crust involves mass and heat transfer from deep to shallow levels. This process modifies the local geotherm and increases the thermal maturation of the crust, affecting the rheological state of the host rock and the composition of magma. Here, we report a petrological, geochemical, isotopic and geochronological integrated study of the Huaco (354 Ma) and Sanagasta (353 Ma, from a new U–Pb zircon age) units from the Carboniferous (Lower Mississippian) Huaco Intrusive Complex, NW Argentina. Similar values of ϵNdt and δ18O, of −3.2 ± 0.7 and +11.2‰ ± 0.3‰ (V-SMOW), respectively, for both units indicate that they shared the same source, as a result of mixing and later homogenization of a crustal component at the Late Devonian (378 to 366 Ma), with metasomatized mantle-derived melts. Slightly higher contents of TiO2, FeO, MgO, CaO and rare earth elements for the Sanagasta unit in comparison with the Huaco unit suggest an increase in the degree of partial melting, which may have been caused by a higher temperature at the lower crust. In addition, the previous structural model of the Huaco Intrusive Complex points to an increase in thermal maturation in the upper crust, which drives a change in the emplacement style from tabular subhorizontal (Huaco) to vertically elongated (Sanagasta) bodies. Therefore, the evolution of the intrusive complex may reflect a generalized thermal maturation of the complete magmatic column, at both upper and lower crustal levels.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Schematic geological map of Sierras Pampeanas, NW Argentina, modified from Larrovere et al. (2020). The limits between older Mesoproterozoic terranes with both Late Neoproterozoic to Early Cambrian Pampean Orogeny and Late Cambrian to Ordovician Orogeny are represented.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Geological sketch map of the central region of the Sierra de Velasco, showing the outcrops of the Huaco Intrusive Complex and the samples analysed for whole rock geochemistry, Nd and O isotopes, U–Pb geochronology and mineral chemistry.

Figure 2

Table 1. Summary of petrological characteristics of the igneous units from Huaco Intrusive Complex

Figure 3

Table 2. Representative composition of plagioclase of the Huaco unit from electron microprobe. Averages from samples HUA-12, Hu-7 and HU-8b

Figure 4

Table 3. Representative composition of plagioclase of the Sanagasta unit from electron microprobe. Averages from samples SAN-15, SAN-19 and SAN-20

Figure 5

Table 4. Representative composition of biotites from the Huaco and Sanagasta units from electron microprobe

Figure 6

Table 5. Major and trace element whole rock data of the Huaco and Sanagasta units

Figure 7

Fig. 3. (a) SiO2 vs Na2O + K2O, wt % variation diagram of Cox et al. (1979) for Huaco (red squares) and Sanagasta (green squares) units. (b) A/CNK vs A/NK of Shand (1943). (c, d) Classification diagrams of Frost et al. (2001): (c) FeOt/(FeOt + MgO) vs SiO2 and (d) Na2O + K2O − CaO vs SiO2.

Figure 8

Fig. 4. (a) Chondrite-normalized (Boynton, 1984) REE plots of Huaco (red shade) and Sanagasta (green shade) units. (b) Primitive-mantle-normalized (Sun & McDonough, 1989) spider diagrams of samples from the Huaco and Sanagasta units.

Figure 9

Table 6. Bulk rock oxygen isotope data of samples from the Huaco and Sanagasta units, and two mafic dykes intruding the Huaco unit

Figure 10

Table 7. LA-MC-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb analytical results from sample SAN-103 of the Sanagasta unit

Figure 11

Fig. 5. U–Pb LA-MC-ICP-MS zircon geochronology of sample SAB-103 from a biotitic porphyritic granodiorite from the Sanagasta unit. The Tera–Wasserburg plots show analyses, and the inset shows the calculated concordia ages. The analysed zircons are also displayed. Three groups of ages were identified: (a) 347–357 Ma; (b) 362–370 Ma; and (c) 374–381 Ma.

Figure 12

Fig. 6. Weighted mean diagrams for the three groups of ages. (a) 347–357 Ma; (b) 362–370 Ma; and (c) 374–381 Ma.

Figure 13

Fig. 7. Harker diagrams for MgO, FeOt, CaO and TiO2 for the Huaco (red squares) and Sanagasta (green squares) units. The arrows indicate possible petrogenetic evolution paths after Moyen et al. (2009).

Figure 14

Fig. 8. Fe2+/(Fe2+ + Mg) vs F (wt %) diagram containing mineral chemistry data from biotites of the Huaco (red circles) and Sanagasta (green circles) units. Dashed line represents a rough boundary for biotite crystallized from A-type granites, with higher Fe2+/(Fe2+ + Mg) ratios to the right, and lower Fe2+/(Fe2+ + Mg) ratios to the left.

Figure 15

Fig. 9. Magmatic evolution of the Huaco and Sanagasta units from the Huaco Intrusive Complex (sketch modified from Alasino et al.2017). The depth (in km) is indicated at the left of the figure.

Supplementary material: File

Macchioli Grande et al. supplementary material

Macchioli Grande et al. supplementary material

Download Macchioli Grande et al. supplementary material(File)
File 7.5 MB