Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:30:19.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

White matter microstructure of the extended limbic system in male and female youth with conduct disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2019

Karen González-Madruga*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Jack Rogers
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Birmingham University Imaging Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Nicola Toschi
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’, Rome, Italy
Roberta Riccelli
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Areti Smaragdi
Affiliation:
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
Ignazio Puzzo
Affiliation:
West London Mental Health Trust, Broadmoor High Secure Hospital, London, UK
Roberta Clanton
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Birmingham University Imaging Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Jesper Andersson
Affiliation:
FMRIB, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Sarah Baumann
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Child Neuropsychology Section, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
Gregor Kohls
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Child Neuropsychology Section, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
Nora Raschle
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Clinics and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Lynn Fehlbaum
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Clinics and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Willeke Menks
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Clinics and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Christina Stadler
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Clinics and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Kerstin Konrad
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Child Neuropsychology Section, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
Christine M. Freitag
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Stephane A. De Brito
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Birmingham University Imaging Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Edmund Sonuga-Barke
Affiliation:
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK
Graeme Fairchild
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Karen González-Madruga, E-mail: Karen.gonzalez.madruga@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Previous studies of conduct disorder (CD) have reported structural and functional alterations in the limbic system. However, the white matter tracts that connect limbic regions have not been comprehensively studied. The uncinate fasciculus (UF), a tract connecting limbic to prefrontal regions, has been implicated in CD. However, CD-related alterations in other limbic tracts, such as the cingulum and the fornix, have not been investigated. Furthermore, few studies have examined the influence of sex and none have been adequately powered to test whether the relationship between CD and structural connectivity differs by sex. We examined whether adolescent males and females with CD exhibit differences in structural connectivity compared with typically developing controls.

Methods

We acquired diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data from 101 adolescents with CD (52 females) and 99 controls (50 females). Data were processed for deterministic spherical deconvolution tractography. Virtual dissections of the UF, the three subdivisions of the cingulum [retrosplenial cingulum (RSC), parahippocampal and subgenual cingulum], and the fornix were performed and measures of fractional anisotropy (FA) and hindrance-modulated orientational anisotropy (HMOA) were analysed.

Results

The CD group had lower FA and HMOA in the right RSC tract relative to controls. Importantly, these effects were moderated by sex – males with CD significantly lower FA compared to male controls, whereas CD and control females did not differ.

Conclusions

Our results highlight the importance of considering sex when studying the neurobiological basis of CD. Sex differences in RSC connectivity may contribute to sex differences in the clinical presentation of CD.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Tractography reconstruction for all limbic white matter tracts. (A) Coronal tractography reconstruction of the subgenual cingulum (SGC): (a) First sphere of interest placed five slices anterior to the mid-sagittal view. (b) Target sphere placed three slices anterior to the genu of the corpus callosum. (c) Final reconstruction of the SGC. (B) Coronal tractography reconstruction of the retrosplenial cingulum (RSC): (a) First sphere of interest placed five slices posterior to the mid-sagittal view. (b) Target sphere placed 3–4 slices above the splenium. (c) Final reconstruction of the RSC. (C) Coronal tractography reconstruction of the parahippocampal cingulum (PHC). (a) First sphere of interest placed behind the splenium. (b) Target sphere placed 3–4 slices below sphere A. (c) Final reconstruction of the PHC. (D) Coronal tractography reconstruction of the uncinate fasciculus (UF): (a) First sphere of interest placed in the fronto-temporal junction. (b) Target sphere placed at the temporal pole. (c) Final reconstruction of the UF. (E) Coronal tractography reconstruction of the fornix. (a) One coronal sphere placed in the body of the fornix. (b) Final reconstruction of the fornix.

Figure 1

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Main effects of diagnosis on fractional anisotropy of the right retrosplenial cingulum. Group differences are significant at p < 0.05, false discovery rate correction. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals of the mean. HC, healthy control; CD, conduct disorder; FA, fractional anisotropy.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Sex by diagnosis interactions in the retrosplenial cingulum tract. (a) Sex by diagnosis interaction on fractional anisotropy values in the right retrosplenial cingulum, *shows that the group difference is pFDR corrected < 0.05 whereas the other other group differences do not survive pFDR correction, which was significant at pFDR = 0.05. (b) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the retrosplenial cingulum tract. (c) Sex by diagnosis interactions in the Hindrance Modulated Orientational Anisotropy of the right retrosplenial cingulum. (d) Sex by diagnosis interactions in the Hindrance Modulated Orientational Anisotropy of the left retrosplenial cingulum. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals of the mean. HC, healthy control; CD, conduct disorder.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Positive association between Conduct Disorder (CD) symptoms and hindrance modulated orientational anisotropy (HMOA) in the right retrosplenial cingulum in the CD group.

Supplementary material: File

González-Madruga et al. supplementary material

González-Madruga et al. supplementary material
Download González-Madruga et al. supplementary material(File)
File 231.5 KB