Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T21:58:53.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distribution of downy mildew (Bremia lactucae Regel) resistances in a genebank collection of lettuce and its wild relatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2011

R. van Treuren*
Affiliation:
Centre for Genetic Resources, The Netherlands, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
A. J. M. van der Arend
Affiliation:
Nunhems Netherlands BV, Noordlandseweg 54, 2691KM 's-Gravenzande, The Netherlands
J. W. Schut
Affiliation:
Rijk Zwaan Breeding BV, PO Box 40, 2678 ZG De Lier, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: robbert.vantreuren@wur.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Genebanks serve as a rich source of diversity that can be exploited for crop improvement. However, large numbers of accessions usually have to be evaluated to find material with the characters of interest, and therefore, enhanced trait information can facilitate the more efficient selection of accessions by users. In this study, we report on the distribution of resistances to 28 races of downy mildew among 1223 genebank accessions of cultivated lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) and 14 related wild species. Due to modern plant breeding, the overall level of resistance of cultivars released after 1950 appears to have increased two- to three-fold compared with varieties from earlier periods. Although fully resistant reactions could be observed among the accessions of cultivated lettuce for each of the 28 investigated races, the resistance probability was more than two-fold higher on average for accessions from the wild gene pool. In general, species of the primary gene pool appeared less resistant than those of the secondary or tertiary gene pool. Probabilities for examined Lactuca species ranged from 0.29 for L. serriola to 1.00 for L. perennis compared with 0.19 for cultivated lettuce, with lower overall resistance probabilities observed only for L. altaica, L. dregeana and L. tenerrima. For L. serriola, the closest relative of cultivated lettuce and the wild species with the highest number of examined accessions, resistance probabilities to each of the investigated downy mildew races were relatively high for populations originating from Eastern Europe and Northern Asia.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2011
Figure 0

Table 1 Number of investigated accessions per Lactuca species, presented separately per crop type for L. sativa. The position assigned to the species within the lettuce gene pool is indicated by primary, secondary or tertiary

Figure 1

Table 2 Investigated downy mildew races with their source, geographical origin and year of introduction

Figure 2

Fig. 1 Mean probability of resistance for lettuce cultivars released during six different time periods. Resistance probabilities were based on the entire set of 28 investigated downy mildew races. The number of examined cultivars per time period is denoted by n.

Figure 3

Fig. 2 Linear regression analysis of the resistance probability ratio of cultivated lettuce versus wild Lactuca species against the chronological series of 23 downy mildew Bl races over all L. sativa accessions, over all lettuce cultivars and over all landraces.

Figure 4

Table 3 Probability of resistance to each of the 28 downy mildew races for 15 Lactuca species. Species are arranged according to their position in the lettuce gene pool. The average number of accessions examined and the average resistance probability per downy mildew race are denoted by ‘sample size’ and ‘overall’, respectively. Resistance probabilities may range from 0 (fully susceptible) to 1 (fully resistant)

Figure 5

Table 4 Probability of resistance to each of the 28 downy mildew races per geographical origin of L. serriola accessions. The average number of accessions examined and the average resistance probability per downy mildew race are denoted by ‘sample size’ and ‘overall’, respectively. Resistance probabilities may range from 0 (fully susceptible) to 1 (fully resistant)