Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:33:40.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design of compact frequency agile filter-antenna using reconfigurable ring resonator bandpass filter for future cognitive radios

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2018

Hany A. Atallah*
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, South Valley University, Qena 83523, Egypt
Adel B. Abdel-Rahman
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, South Valley University, Qena 83523, Egypt
Kuniaki Yoshitomi
Affiliation:
School of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
Ramesh K. Pokharel
Affiliation:
School of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: Hany A. Atallah, E-mail: h.atallah@eng.svu.edu.eg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, a new miniaturized frequency agile filter-antenna with a wide reconfigurable frequency band is proposed for interweave cognitive radios (CRs). A tunable bandpass filter (BPF) composed of a symmetrical ring resonator is cascaded to the feed line of an ultra-wideband planar antenna. The structure of the proposed ring resonator BPF is simple and compact so that the total size of the proposed filter-antenna is smaller than that of a conventional system made of a separate antenna and BPF. The reconfigurability of the proposed filter-antenna is achieved by changing the operating frequency of the BPF by loading the ring resonator with a single varactor diode at its center. The fabricated prototype has successfully achieved a wide operational bandwidth of 1.43 GHz which covers continuous narrow bands from 4.65 to 6.08 GHz. Moreover, the operating tunable narrow bands have stable radiation characteristics. Good agreement between measurement and simulation results is demonstrated.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Unloaded ring resonator under even- and odd-modes. (a) Unloaded ring. (b) Odd-mode excitation. (c) Even-mode excitation.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Loaded ring resonator under even- and odd-modes. (a) Loaded ring. (b) Odd-mode excitation. (c) Even-mode excitation.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Input impedance of the loaded ring versus frequency at different capacitances of the varactor diode.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Layout of the reconfigurable ring resonator filter. (a) Front view. (b) Back view.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. The |S| parameters and electric field distributions of the unloaded ring resonator filter. (a) Simulated |S| parameters. (b) Simulated electric field distributions over the ring resonator at the resonant frequencies.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. The |S| parameters of the reconfigurable ring resonator filter. (a) Simulated |S11| parameters. (b) Simulated |S21| parameters.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Layout of the proposed filter-antenna and ECM of the varactor. (a) Top view. (b) Bottom view. (c) ECM of the varactor diode.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Simulated |S11| parameters of the reference UWB antenna.

Figure 8

Table 1. Varactor diode ECM parameters

Figure 9

Fig. 9. |S11| parameters, realized gains, and total efficiencies of the proposed filter-antenna. (a) Simulated |S11| parameters. (b) Simulated realized gains. (c) Simulated total efficiencies.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Comparisons between the center frequencies and the bandwidths of the filter and the filter-antenna.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Comparisons between the patterns of the reference and the proposed filter-antenna at 4.74 GHz.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Photograph of the proposed fabricated ring resonator filter-antenna and the results. (a) Front view. (b) Back view. (c) Measured |S11| parameters. (d) Measured and simulated |S11| parameters at selected values. (e) Comparison of measured and simulated realized gains.

Figure 13

Fig. 13. The measured and simulated ring resonator filter-antenna radiation patterns. (a) Cj = 2.67 pF. (b) Cj = 0.97 pF. (c) Cj = 0.77 pF. (d) Cj = 0.63 pF.