Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:26:16.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of epibiotic Enteromorpha spp. on the mole crab Emerita analoga in the Peruvian central coast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2008

Fausto N. Firstater*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Ecología, Departamento de Biología, FCEyN, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, CC 573 Correo Central, B7600WAG, Mar del Plata, Argentina
Fernando J. Hidalgo
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Ecología, Departamento de Biología, FCEyN, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, CC 573 Correo Central, B7600WAG, Mar del Plata, Argentina
Betina J. Lomovasky
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Ecología, Departamento de Biología, FCEyN, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, CC 573 Correo Central, B7600WAG, Mar del Plata, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Rivadavia 1917, (1033) Buenos Aires, Argentina
Percy Gallegos
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Apartado 1898, Lima 100, Peru
Patricia Gamero
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Apartado 1898, Lima 100, Peru
Oscar O. Iribarne
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Ecología, Departamento de Biología, FCEyN, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, CC 573 Correo Central, B7600WAG, Mar del Plata, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Rivadavia 1917, (1033) Buenos Aires, Argentina
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Fausto N. Firstater, Laboratorio de Ecología, Departamento de Biología, FCEyN, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, CC 573 Correo Central, B7600WAG, Mar del Plata, Argentina email: firstate@mdp.edu.ar
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Epibiotic interactions between macroalgae and crustaceans have rarely been described. We examined the interaction between the mole crab, Emerita analoga and the opportunistic algae Enteromopha spp. in a sandy beach of the central coast of Peru. Enteromorpha spp. was found fouling the carapace of the mole crab that provides the only stable substrate to spore settlement in the beach environment. Epibiosis prevalence was up to 2.1%, and affected mainly larger, ovigerous females. Prevalence presented a seasonal pattern, with peaks during summer. Mole crab body condition was higher when fouled, whereas fecundity was not affected. Fouled mole crabs burrowed at lower speed, which was reversible by the removal of epibiotic algae. The burrowing depth was not affected by epibiosis. Contrary to the expected, the effects of algal epibiosis on demographic and life history parameters of mole crabs, with the exception of body condition, were mainly neutral but important on behavioural traits.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the study area, Ancón Bay, on the Peruvian central coast, indicating Huaquillo beach.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Dorsal and right side carapace view of Emerita analoga fouled by Entermorpha spp. L1 (A, D) and L2 (B, E), and Ulva spp. (C, F).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Size-ranges for males, females, ovigerous females and recruits (median, whisker: 5th to 95th percentile sizes, box: 25th to 75th percentile sizes) during the year at Huaquillo beach. Letters denote significant differences at α = 0.05 (two-way ANOVA with subsequent Tukey's HDS test).

Figure 3

Table 1. Emerita analoga population characteristics at Huaquillo beach for the studied months. The values in parentheses are standard deviations.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Body condition (DM/CL) by epibiosis level and egg stage for ovigerous females at Huaquillo beach in October. Median, whisker: 5th to 95th percentile, box: 25th to 75th percentile. White box indicates females with egg stage 2, light grey females with egg stage 3 and dark grey females with egg stage 4. Letters denote significant differences at α = 0.05 (two-way ANOVA with subsequent Tukey's HDS test).

Figure 5

Table 2. Summary of regression models of dry mass (dependent variable) versus CL (independent variable). Values of r2 are significant (P < 0.05).

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Crab size (CL, independent variable) and fecundity (number of eggs, dependent variable) regression by epibiosis level. Linear regression was significant for females L0 (P < 0.05).

Figure 7

Table 3. Summary of regression models of burrowing time (dependent variable) versus CL (independent variable). Values of r2 are significant (P < 0.05).

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Burrowing time by experimental group (L0, L1 with and without removed algae, L2 with and without removed algae. Median, whisker: 5th to 95th percentile, box: 25th to 75th percentile). Letters denote significant differences at α = 0.05 (two-way ANOVA with subsequent Tukey's HDS test).