Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T04:51:22.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cochlear implantation of a patient with multiple sclerosis: case report and systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2021

J Routila*
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
J O Karhu
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
J Salonen
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
*
Author for correspondence: Mr Johannes Routila, Department of Audiology, Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, Turku FI-20521, Finland E-mail: johannes.routila@utu.fi
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Cochlear implantation can be used when a patient's hearing cannot satisfactorily be improved after optimised hearing aid fitting. However, in patients with a cochlear nerve or brain disorder affecting hearing, the benefits of cochlear implants are not so straightforward.

Methods

This paper describes a 58-year-old patient suffering from multiple sclerosis and profound sensorineural hearing loss, rehabilitated with a cochlear implant. Literature concerning cochlear implantation in demyelinating conditions was systematically reviewed using PubMed/Medline and Web of Science databases.

Results

The patient's cochlear implantation was successful, with speech discrimination scores remaining above 90 per cent for eight years post-operatively. No previous cases of cochlear implantation with multiple sclerosis related hearing loss have been reported, despite the high incidence of hearing loss in multiple sclerosis patients.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates that multiple sclerosis lesions should not be an exclusion criterion in an otherwise suitable candidate for cochlear implantation.

Information

Type
Clinical Records
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Audiogram conducted prior to cochlear implantation, demonstrating profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, especially in the higher frequencies. (b) Results of video head impulse testing for horizontal semicircular canals, demonstrating bilateral loss of vestibular function. (△ = aided hearing threshold in soundfield (red: right; blue: left); ○ = air conduction masked (right); ] = bone conduction (mastoid) masked (left); [ = bone conduction (mastoid) masked (right); × = air conduction masked (left); downward arrows = no response)

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan through the upper medulla oblongata shows demyelinating plaque (arrow) located in the area of the cochlear nucleus. (b) Axial T2-weighted MRI scan through the brainstem shows multiple demyelinating plaques on the mid pontine level, predominantly on the left side. (c) Axial, contrast-enhanced, T1-weighted, thin-slice MRI section through the left internal acoustic canal shows a small gadolinium-enhancing mass of 4 mm diameter (arrow) corresponding to a vestibulocochlear nerve schwannoma. (d) A follow-up axial, contrast-enhanced, thin-slice computed tomography image through the left internal acoustic canal and cerebellum shows no evidence of vestibulocochlear nerve schwannoma growth six years after cochlear implantation.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Flow chart of the literature review. PubMed/Medline and Web of Science databases were searched using the search term construct: (multiple sclerosis OR demyelinat*) AND (cochlear implant*). Altogether, seven relevant publications were identified and reviewed for this paper. ADHD = Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder