Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T20:33:55.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cavum septum pellucidum and psychopathy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Päivi Toivonen,
Mervi Könönen,
Eini Niskanen,
Olli Vaurio,
Eila Repo-Tiihonen,
Allan Seppänen,
Hannu J. Aronen,
Ritva Vanninen,
Jari Tiihonen and
Mikko P. Laakso
Päivi Toivonen*
Affiliation:
Vanha Vaasa Hospital, Vaasa, Finland
Mervi Könönen
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Radiology, Department of Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
Eini Niskanen
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Radiology, Department of Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
Olli Vaurio
Affiliation:
Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
Eila Repo-Tiihonen
Affiliation:
Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
Allan Seppänen
Affiliation:
Vanha Vaasa Hospital, Vaasa, Finland
Hannu J. Aronen
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
Ritva Vanninen
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
Jari Tiihonen
Affiliation:
Niuvaniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland, and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Mikko P. Laakso*
Affiliation:
Vanha Vaasa Hospital, Vaasa, Finland, and Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
*
Mikko P. Laakso, MD, PhD, Vanha Vaasa Hospital, Rolling Stone Road 1 65380 Vaasa, Finland. Email: mikko.laakso@uef.fi.
Mikko P. Laakso, MD, PhD, Vanha Vaasa Hospital, Rolling Stone Road 1 65380 Vaasa, Finland. Email: mikko.laakso@uef.fi.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The presence of cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) has been reported to be a neurodevelopmental marker of psychopathy. We scanned 26 violent offenders and 25 controls; 2 offenders and 2 controls had CSP (8% in both groups). Thus, the presence of CSP is not a common or a unique feature of antisocial personality disorder or psychopathy.

Information

Type
Short Report
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 203 , Issue 2 , August 2013, pp. 152 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2013 

Studying psychopathy has several medico-legal implications. In 1999 the British Home Office drafted a proposal whereby an individual could be incarcerated if deemed potentially dangerous without being sentenced for violent criminal activity. 1 Later this was launched as the Dangerous and Severe Personality Disorder Programme. Reference Mullen2 However, psychopathy has gained attention as a form of behaviour that is destructive not only to society but also to the individual. At an individual level, studying psychopathy may provide a proxy to observe several domains of cognition, such as decision-making: psychopaths tend to choose wrong actions and not learn from these. Reference Bechara, Damasio, Damasio and Anderson3,Reference Raine, Lencz, Bihrle, LaCasse and Colletti4 If changes in the functioning of the central nervous system could be scanned, this would provide clues to detecting psychopathy. Hence, if a surrogate marker for psychopathy was to be found, it might help in the selection of individuals for incarceration. However, if such a marker was used carelessly or if it was unspecific, gross violations of basic human rights would ensue.

Raine et al have studied the presence of cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) in people with antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy. Reference Raine, Lee, Yang and Colletti5 In their study, people who had CSP had a higher degree of psychopathy and higher levels of antisocial personality disorder. What prompted Raine et al to study CSP was data from trials conducted with various experimental animals, ranging from rodents to monkeys, where anomalies or irritation of septum pellucidum has been found to be associated with increased aggression. Reference Sarwar6,Reference Shaw and Alvord7 So far, Raine et al's study has not been replicated (Google Scholar, accessed on 5 May 2013). We therefore set out to replicate their study, using our own material, aiming to confirm or contest their results.

Method

Participants

Participants in this study were all men; there were 26 violent offenders and 25 age-matched healthy controls from a control pool (mainly hospital staff, friends, students, spouses, etc.). Data about the offenders were derived from university forensic psychiatric hospital records where they had been evaluated for pre-trial purposes. All were charged with violent offences (two murder, ten manslaughter, four attempted murder or manslaughter, one assisting manslaughter, six aggravated assaults and three armed robberies). Each had a history of recurrent violent acts, and all but two had previous convictions. None had a history or current diagnosis of psychosis. The diagnoses were made by consensus by using multiple sources of information. All of the offenders fulfilled criteria for both antisocial personality disorder (DSM-IV) 8 and dissocial personality (ICD-10). 9 Psychopathy Checklist - Revised (PCL-R) Reference Hare, Clark, Grann and Thornton10 ratings were used to assess psychopathy. Moreover, all met the DSM-IV and the ICD-10 criteria for substance abuse related to polysubstance drugs (n = 20) or alcohol abuse (n = 6) with early-onset alcoholism corresponding to Cloninger type 2 young-onset alcoholism. As none were psychotic, all were judged to be competent to stand trial. The study setting was approved by the local ethics committee.

Imaging

The participants were scanned with a 1.0 T Impact (Siemens; Erlangen, Germany) using a standard head coil and a tilted T1-weighted sequence (MPRAGE, repetition time (TR) = 10 ms, echo time (TE) = 4 ms, inversion time (TI) = 250 ms, flip angle 12°, field of view (FOV) = 250 mm, matrix 256 × 192, 1 acquisition), no interslice gap. The images thus acquired were resliced to 1.0 mm thick continuous coronal slices, no gap, perpendicular to the anterior-posterior commissural (AC-PC) line using SPM2 software on Windows.

Image analysis and the definition of CSP

Image analysis took place using Analyze 6.0 software on Windows. Identical criteria to those used by Raine et al Reference Raine, Lee, Yang and Colletti5 were used. The presence of CSP was defined as CSP present in six or more 1.0 mm thick coronal slices.

Results

The two groups were matched for age (control group: mean age 35 years (s.d. = 8), offender group: mean age 34 years (s.d. = 10)). The mean PCL-R score in the offenders was 26.2 (s.d. = 3.8, range 20-34). Cavum septum pellucidum was present in two controls and two offenders (8% in both groups). In addition to CSP, one of the controls had cavum vergae.

Discussion

In this study we investigated whether violent offenders have an increased prevalence of CSP compared with a control group. We found this not to be the case. Our setting was similar to that in Raine et al's study; Reference Raine, Lee, Yang and Colletti5 the only difference being that Raine et al collected data from temporary employment agencies, whereas we collected ours from pre-trial forensic psychiatric examinations. Therefore Raine and colleagues' material is from, as they state, ‘successful’ criminals who have avoided incarceration. Be that as it may, our criminals were probably studied more carefully, with the forensic psychiatric examination typically lasting months.

A large neuropathological study has suggested that 100% of preterm children have CSP. Postpartum, in full-term infants the prevalence falls quickly, ranging from absent to about 10% by the age of 16. Reference Shaw and Alvord7 Our finding of 8% in both groups is very close to this. In conclusion, we suggest that the presence of CSP is not an exclusive, or even a typical, feature of violent individuals with antisocial personality disorder or psychopathy.

Funding

This study was supported by funding from annual EVO financing (special government subsidies) to Niuvanniemi and Vanha Vaasa Hospitals and by the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation.

Footnotes

∗

This short paper is published here to offset the common tendency for journals to publish positive rather than negative results. I stress that its publication should not indicate to potential authors that submission of papers showing similar contradictory findings in other areas of psychiatry will be published in the same way. The British Journal of Negative Results in Psychiatry has yet to be launched. The Editor

Declaration of interest

None.

References

1 British Home Office. Managing Dangerous People with Severe Personality Disorder. Proposals for Policy Development. British Home Office, 1999 (http://www.nationalarchives.gov.Uk/ERORecords/HO/421/2/P2/CPD/DANGCD.HTM)Google Scholar
2 Mullen, PE. Dangerous and severe personality disorder and in need of treatment. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 190 (suppl 49): S3–7.Google Scholar
3 Bechara, A, Damasio, AR, Damasio, H, Anderson, SW. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 1994; 50: 7–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Raine, A, Lencz, T, Bihrle, S, LaCasse, L, Colletti, P. Reduced prefrontal gray matter volume and reduced autonomic activity in antisocial personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000; 57: 119–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Raine, A, Lee, L, Yang, Y, Colletti, P. Neurodevelopmental marker for limbic maldevelopment in antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 197: 186–92.Google Scholar
6 Sarwar, M. The septum pellucidum: normal and abnormal. Am J Neuroradiol 1989; 10: 989–1005.Google Scholar
7 Shaw, C-M, Alvord, EC Jr. Cava septum pellucidi et vergæ: their normal and pathological states. Brain 1969; 92: 213–24.Google Scholar
8 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn) (DSM-IV). APA, 1994.Google Scholar
9 World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. WHO, 1992.Google Scholar
10 Hare, RD, Clark, D, Grann, M, Thornton, D. Psychopathy and the predictive validity of the PCL-R: an international perspective. Behav Sci Law 2000; 18: 623–45.Google Scholar

This journal is not currently accepting new eletters.

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.