Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:03:11.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cross-resistance to diquat in glyphosate/paraquat-resistant hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) and horseweed (Conyza canadensis) and confirmation of 2,4-D resistance in Conyza bonariensis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2021

Marcelo L. Moretti*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Oregon State University, Department of Horticulture, Corvallis, OR, USA
Lucas K. Bobadilla
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Crop Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
Bradley D. Hanson
Affiliation:
UCCE Weed Science Specialist, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Marcelo L Moretti, Oregon State University, Department of Horticulture, 4017 Agriculture and Life Sciences, 2750 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR 97331. Email: marcelo.moretti@oregonstate.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hairy fleabane and horseweed are pervasive weed species in agriculture. Glyphosate-resistant (GR) and glyphosate/paraquat–resistant (GPR) biotypes challenge current management strategies. These GR and GPR biotypes have non–target site resistance, which can confer resistance to herbicides with different sites of action (SOAs). This study’s objective was to characterize the response of GR, GPR, and glyphosate/paraquat–susceptible (GPS) biotypes of both weed species to herbicides with a different SOA. Whole-plant dose–response bioassays indicated a similar response among tested biotypes of both weed species to rimsulfuron, dicamba, hexazinone, glufosinate, flumioxazin, saflufenacil, or mesotrione. The hairy fleabane GR and GPR biotypes were 2.7- and 2.9-fold resistant to 2,4-D relative to the GPS biotype (GR50 766.7 g ai ha–1), confirming 2,4-D resistance in hairy fleabane for the first time in California. The GR and GPR biotypes were not cross-resistant to dicamba. No differences in response to 2,4-D were observed among horseweed biotypes with a GR50 ranging from 150.2 to 277.4 g ai ha–1. The GPR biotypes of both species were cross-resistant to diquat, with a 44.0-fold resistance in hairy fleabane (GR50 863.7 g ai ha–1) and 15.6-fold resistance in horseweed (GR50 563.1 g ai ha–1). The confirmation of multiple resistances to glyphosate, paraquat, and 2,4-D in hairy fleabane curtails herbicide SOA alternatives and jeopardizes resistance management strategies based on herbicide rotation and tank mixtures, underscoring the critical need for nonchemical weed control alternatives.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America
Figure 0

Table 1. POST herbicides used in the experiments. Site of action, active ingredient, trade name, rates, reference rate, and manufacturers.

Figure 1

Table 2. Fixed factors for logistic and ANOVA analysis for mortality and biomass of Conyza spp.

Figure 2

Table 3. Regression parameter estimates and standard errors for plant mortality and biomass of hairy fleabane and Conyza spp. 28 d after foliar treatment with different herbicides. A common regression logistic regression was fitted across biotypes within each species and herbicide tested.a

Figure 3

Table 4. Estimated nonlinear regression parameters for hairy fleabane and horseweed biotypes from California in response to 2,4-D and diquat. Mortality and dry-biomass whole-plant dose–response assay were estimated for glyphosate/paraquat-susceptible (GPS), glyphosate-resistant (GR), and glyphosate/paraquat-resistant (GPR) biotypes of each species.a

Supplementary material: File

Moretti et al. supplementary material

Figures S1 and S2

Download Moretti et al. supplementary material(File)
File 17.4 MB