Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:52:25.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Forage mass, nutritional value and decomposition dynamics of forages intercropped with maize in an integrated system in a tropical climate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2025

Gustavo Henrique Silva Camargos*
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Federal University of Minas Gerais , Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
Roberto Guimarães Júnior
Affiliation:
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation – Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, DF, Brazil
Allan Kardec Braga Ramos
Affiliation:
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation – Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, DF, Brazil
Marcelo Ayres Carvalho
Affiliation:
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation – Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, DF, Brazil
Lúcio Carlos Gonçalves
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Federal University of Minas Gerais , Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
Alan Figueiredo de Oliveira
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Biological and Health Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
Ângela Maria Quintão Lana
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Federal University of Minas Gerais , Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: Gustavo Henrique Silva Camargos; Email: gustavohenrique641@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The selection of suitable forages for intercropping with annual crops is a key factor in enhancing the resilience and sustainability of integrated crop-livestock systems (ICLS). This study aimed to evaluate the forage mass, nutritional value, and biomass decomposition dynamics of forages intercropped with maize in an integrated system under tropical conditions. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with a split-plot arrangement and four replicates per treatment. Maize was intercropped with various grasses in 2022/23, while soybean was grown on the grass residue in 2023/24. The ‘R86’ and ‘254-1’ genotypes increased their biomass by 116% from the first to the third harvest, while ‘BRS Integra’ showed a 52.3% reduction, and ‘BRS Sarandi’ remained stable at 3,442 kg dry matter (DM)/ha. The hybrid ‘1242-10’ presented 115 g crude protein, 527 g neutral detergent fibre, and 677 g organic matter digestibility/kg DM. Biomass from ‘254-1’ released 44.0, 7.53, and 46.1 kg/ha of nitrogen, diphosphorus pentoxide and potassium oxide, respectively. Genotypes ‘R86’, ‘254-1’ and ‘BRS Sarandi’ can be used for intercropping with maize in soybean-based ICLS. This is likely the first study to investigate the use of recently released, genetically improved forage genotypes, such as ‘BRS Integra’ and ‘BRS Sarandi’, in an ICLS in the Cerrado biome.

Information

Type
Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Accumulated rainfall and average temperature recorded from November 2022 to March 2024.

Figure 1

Table 1. Grain yield of maize hybrid LG 36790 VTPRO3 in monoculture or intercropped with forages during the first growing season

Figure 2

Table 2. Canopy height and forage mass of the forages intercropped with maize during the first growing season at different cutting times (April, June and September)

Figure 3

Table 3. Concentrations of CP and NDFcp of the forages intercropped with maize during the first growing season at different cutting times (April, June and September)

Figure 4

Table 4. In vitro digestibility of dry matter and organic matter of the forages intercropped with maize during the first growing season

Figure 5

Table 5. Initial biomass, initial concentration of nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg and S), and lignin: nitrogen ratio in the biomass of the forages intercropped with maize in the first crop and managed for subsequent no-till soybean planting in an integrated production system

Figure 6

Table 6. Initial concentrations of NDFcp and lignin in the biomass of the forages intercropped with maize in the first crop and managed for subsequent no-till soybean planting in an integrated production system

Figure 7

Figure 2. Amount of biomass remaining from forage biomasses (a), and dynamics of the apparent disappearance of nitrogen (b), phosphorus (c) and potassium (d) in the biomass of forages during the soybean production cycle (0–120 days) in an integrated production system – Cerrado biome, 2023/24. Error bars represent ± standard error of the means and **significant at 1 %.

Figure 8

Figure 3. Dynamics of the apparent disappearance of magnesium (a), sulphur (b) and calcium (c) in the biomass of forages during the soybean production cycle (0–120 days) in an integrated production system – Cerrado biome, 2023/24. Error bars represent ± standard error of the means and **significant at 1 %.

Figure 9

Table 7. Equivalent amounts of nitrogen, urea, diphosphorus pentoxide, simple superphosphate, potassium oxide and potassium chloride released from the desiccated biomass of forages over 120 days under cultivation with soybeans

Figure 10

Table 8. Plant height and first pod insertion, number of pods per plant, number of plants per area, weight of 1000 grains and grain yield of soybean grown on biomass of forages from maize cultivation in the previous crop year