Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:38:57.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy characterization of aerosol particles in Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2015

Simona Rella
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, Di.S.Te.B.A., University of Salento, via Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
Cosimino Malitesta*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, Di.S.Te.B.A., University of Salento, via Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of surface species on size-segregated atmospheric particulate collected in Antarctica during the 2010–11 summer was performed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). This represents the first example of surface characterization of Antarctic aerosols. The size class with particle cut-off diameter of 3 μm was richest in terms of chemical elements. Peculiar findings of the application included detection of Ca (possibly surface-segregated) and surface enrichment of Mg. The determination of nitrate, ammonium and sulphate species on collection filters provides evidence for a possible advantage of XPS over more laborious techniques (e.g. ion chromatography). The presence of these species is in reasonable agreement with other recent reports from Antarctica.

Information

Type
Physical Sciences
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 High resolution spectra of C 1s region.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Survey scan spectra for blank filter.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Survey scan spectra for a PM sample (size fraction: 3.0 µm particle cut-off diameter). The region in the square is shown enlarged at the right-hand side.

Figure 3

Fig. 4 High resolution spectra of Fe 2p region for PM sample (size fraction: 3.0 µm particle cut-off diameter).

Figure 4

Fig. 5 High resolution spectra of Al 2p region for PM sample (size fraction: 3.0 µm particle cut-off diameter).

Figure 5

Fig. 6 High resolution spectra of Na 1s region for PM sample (size fraction: 3.0 µm particle cut-off diameter).

Figure 6

Fig. 7 High resolution spectra of Ca 2p region for PM sample (size fraction: 3.0 µm particle cut-off diameter).

Figure 7

Fig. 8 High resolution spectra of Mg 1s region for PM sample (size fraction: 3.0 µm particle cut-off diameter).

Figure 8

Fig. 9 Atomic ratios refer to cellulosic carbon and are obtained following subtraction of the atomic contribution of the blank filter. Absence of a bar corresponding to a particular element means that either the PM elemental content is not significantly different from the blank filter (S, F, Si) or a relevant XPS signal was not detected (Cl, Ca, Mg, Al, Fe, P, Zn).

Figure 9

Table I Binding energy values of the detected elements and their assignments.

Figure 10

Fig. 10 High resolution spectra of N 1s region for PM sample (size fraction: 0.95 µm particle cut-off diameter).

Figure 11

Fig. 11 High resolution spectra of N 1s region for PM sample (size fraction: 3.0 µm particle cut-off diameter).

Figure 12

Fig. 12 Atomic percentage indicating the distribution of the N components between size fractions.

Figure 13

Fig. 13 High resolution spectra of S 2p region for PM sample (size fraction: 3.0 µm particle cut-off diameter).

Figure 14

Fig. 14 High resolution spectra of S 2p region for a. PM filter and b. blank filter (size fraction: 3.0 µm particle cut-off diameter), and c. clean filter.

Figure 15

Fig. 15 High resolution spectra of F 1s region for a. PM filter and b. blank filter (size fraction: 3.0 µm particle cut-off diameter), and c. clean filter.