Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T05:28:35.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does size matter? The effects of body size and declining oxygen tension on oxygen uptake in gastropods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

Islay D. Marsden*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Sandra E. Shumway
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, 1080 Shennecossett Road, Groton, CT 06340
Dianna K. Padilla
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5245
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: I. Marsden, School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand email: islay.marsden@canterbury.ac.nz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Metabolic rate is one of the most frequently measured physiological variables and the relationship between oxygen uptake and body mass is one of the most controversial issues in biology. The present study used closed chamber respirometry to compare the oxygen uptake of 32 species of benthic British gastropod molluscs of a wide size-range (from less than 0.001 g to greater than 10 g dry tissue weight). We investigated the effects of body size on the respiratory rate at 10°C to explore the evolutionary and phylogenetically determined patterns of metabolic scaling both among different gastropods groups, and within siphonate and asiphonate caenogastropods. Resting oxygen uptake ( O2) increased with body mass (W) with a slope value of 0.6 using both ordinary least squares (OLS) and standard major axis (SMA) where N = 488, over a 6 fold range of body mass. The slopes b of the regression lines relating oxygen uptake to body mass were similar for all heterobranch molluscs and most caenogastropods. Highest mass-specific rates for oxygen consumption were found for the smallest littorinid species. Trophic mode significantly affected the amount of oxygen consumed with higher oxygen uptake in herbivores than other groups, including detritivores and predators. All of the gastropods reduced their oxygen consumption when exposed to declining oxygen conditions; however, about a third of the species exhibited partial regulation at higher oxygen partial pressures. When exposed to 20% normal saturation levels, smaller gastropods respired at approximately 25% of their rates in fully saturated seawater whereas larger species (above 0.1 g dry tissue weight) respired at approximately 35% of the values recorded at full saturation. Our study suggests that a scaling exponent relating O2 to body mass of 0.6 is typical and may be ‘universal’ for gastropods. It is below the 0.75 scaling exponent which has been proposed for ectothermic invertebrates. It is concluded that size does matter in determining the metabolic patterns of gastropods and that the quantity of oxygen consumed and the energy balance of gastropods is affected by activity, food type and exposure to declining oxygen conditions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2011
Figure 0

Table 1.Species names; C, code number for analyses; Feeding type; Depth; Habitat; L, collecting locations: A, Anglesey; D, Dundee; I, Irish sea; P, Plymouth; O, Oban. Information from Bruce et al. (1963); Eales (1967); Fretter & Graham (1962); Gosner (1971); Morton (1979); Howson & Picton 1997; ETI, macrobenthos of the North Sea and own information. Tidal levels abbreviations as in Lewis (1961), from extreme high water springs (EHWS) to extreme low water springs (ELWS).

Figure 1

Fig. 1.Oxygen uptake (ml O2. h−1) plotted against dry body mass (W) for the complete gastropod data set (N = 488) O2 = 0.1304W 0.59 where r = 0.94 (P < 0.001) using OLS and 0.158W0.62 using standard major axis regression.

Figure 2

Table 2.Regression statistics using ordinary least squares (OLS) and standard major axis (SMA) relating O2 .h−1 to body dry mass in 29 species of British gastropods; N, number of points; a, regression constant or intercept; b, scaling exponent; r, correlation coefficient. All the regression lines are significant P < 0.05.

Figure 3

Fig. 2.Comparison of respiration rates (ml O2. . h−1) in different gastropod species. (A) Patellogastropoda (limpets); (B) Vestigastropoda (slit limpets, topshells); (C) Caenogastropoda–asiphonate group; (D) Caenogastropoda–siphonate group; (E) Heterobranchia (slugs). The ordinary least squares and standard major axis regression information for each species is included in Table 2 and the comparisons of the regression lines (analysis of covariance) within and amongst groups included in Tables 3 & 4.

Figure 4

Fig. 3.Effects of body size on the oxygen consumption in different taxonomic groups of gastropods. The ordinary least squares (OLS) mass exponent b is 0.62 for patellogastropods, 0.48 for vestigastropods, 0.63 for asiphonates, 0.59 for siphonates, 0.62 for heterobranchia and 0.52 for Turitella. All of the OLS regression lines were significant P < 0.05. Comparisons of the regression lines (analysis of covariance) within and amongst groups included in Tables 3 & 4.

Figure 5

Table 3.Analysis of covariance ordinary least squares comparison of the mass exponent (slopes of regression lines) of different taxonomic groupings. N, the number of species per group; F statistic; df, degrees of freedom; P, probability; NS, non-significant.

Figure 6

Table 4.Analysis of covariance comparing the intercept values of regression lines calculated by ordinary least squares relating O2 to dry tissue mass (g) of 28 species of British gastropods (Neptunea removed) according to taxonomic group. N, the number of species included in taxonomic group; F statistic (elevation); df, degrees of freedom; P, probability; SG, number of species groupings; HGp, results of Tuckey post-hoc tests for species that are grouped together; numbers in parentheses are the code numbers for species in the same group.

Figure 7

Fig. 4.(A) Effects of trophic mode and (B) habitat (water depth) on size-related respiration in gastropods. All of the regressions were significant P < 0.05 and the mass exponents (ordinary least squares) are shown next to the legends. Comparisons of the regression lines (analysis of covariance) within and amongst groups are included in Table 5.

Figure 8

Table 5.Analysis of covariance comparing the intercept values (elevation) of regression lines (ordinary least squares) relating O2 to dry tissue mass (g) of 28 species of British gastropods (Neptunea removed) according to their feeding type. N, the number of species included in the feeding type; F statistic; df, degrees of freedom; P, probability; SG, number of species groupings; PHT, results of Tuckey post-hoc tests for species that are grouped together; numbers in parentheses are the code numbers for species in the same group; OL, overlapping species groups; diff, indicating species that are different.

Figure 9

Fig. 5.(A & B) Oxygen uptake of gastropods in response to declining oxygen conditions. Each trace is for an individual gastropod with the species arranged in alphabetical order.

Figure 10

Fig. 6.Comparison of the effects of declining oxygen tension on the oxygen uptake of gastropods from different taxa. The code numbers refer to the species listed in Table 6 and the bars show the standard error. For the Heterobranchia results were from a single individual (species codes 2, 13 and 29).

Figure 11

Table 6.Correlation coefficients (r) for linear and quadratic equations and regression constant B2 ( × 103) of quadratic equation relating O2 g−1 h−1 to declining oxygen tensions for 32 species of British gastropods. C, code number of species used in analysis; N, number of individuals.

Figure 12

Fig. 7.Mass-specific respiration rates (calculated from ordinary least squares regressions for the average weight of gastropod for each species) arranged with the smallest species at the bottom of the figure.