Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-7drmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T22:15:10.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of the crop species Brassica napus and wild B. rapa: characteristics relevant for building up a persistent seed bank in the soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2013

Tom J. de Jong*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biology, Leiden University, PO Box 9505, 2300 RALeiden, The Netherlands
Maria Tudela Isanta
Affiliation:
Institute of Biology, Leiden University, PO Box 9505, 2300 RALeiden, The Netherlands
Elze Hesse
Affiliation:
Institute of Biology, Leiden University, PO Box 9505, 2300 RALeiden, The Netherlands
*
*Correspondence Fax: +31-71-5274900E-mail: t.j.de.jong@biology.leidenuniv.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Can seed characters be used for predicting the presence of a persistent seed bank in the field? We address this question using ten cultivars of the crop Brassica napus, ten feral B. napus accessions originating from seeds collected in the field and nine accessions of the closely related ruderal species Brassica rapa. When buried for a year in the field, seeds of the wild B. rapa displayed, as expected, much higher survival fractions than those of domesticated B. napus at two different locations in The Netherlands. Compared to B. napus, B. rapa produces relatively small seeds with high levels of aliphatic glucosinolates and a thick seed coat. However, within each species none of these characters correlated with seed survival in the soil. At low temperatures, B. rapa seeds had lower and more variable germination fractions than those of B. napus; a small fraction (4.6%) of the B. rapa seeds showed primary dormancy. Rather surprisingly, B. napus displayed genetic differences in germination at low temperature, and germination fractions at 5°C correlated negatively with seed survival in the soil. Our comparisons between and within the two species suggest that foregoing germination at low temperatures is an important character for developing a persistent seed bank. We discuss our results in light of environmental risk assessment of genetically modified B. napus.

Information

Type
Research paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Table 1 Summary of the Brassica napus cultivars used and properties of the seeds (glucosinolate content, mass per seed and fraction dry mass in seed coat)

Figure 1

Table 2 Summary of the feral Brassica napus accessions sampled in the field and properties of the seeds

Figure 2

Table 3 Summary of the wild Brassica rapa accessions sampled in the wild and properties of the seeds

Figure 3

Table 4 Percentage germination* of eight selected cultivars under light and dark conditions at 20°C

Figure 4

Figure 1 Temperature-dependent germination of 1-year-old seeds of various Brassica napus accessions: top, three modern cultivars; middle, three feral accessions; bottom, feral accession from Utrecht and the old crop Mansholt's Hamburger.

Figure 5

Figure 2 Correlation between germination percentage at low temperature (5°C) of 1-year-old Brassica napus seeds and fraction survival of seeds in the soil in a dry habitat (Swifterbant, closed dots) and in a wet habitat (Boskoop, crosses).

Figure 6

Figure 3 Dark storage for 4 weeks in the field reduced percentage germination of fresh seeds of the B. rapa accession Maarssen 1 (open diamonds and broken regression line = control, closed diamonds and solid line = dark), but had no effect on Maarssen 2 (open squares and broken line = control, closed squares and solid regression line = dark).

Figure 7

Table 5 Output of a linear model that predicts % germination (75% explained variance) of Brassica rapa from temperature (T), treatment (tmt, control or dark storage) and accession (ac, Maarssen 1 and Maarssen 2) and their interactions

Figure 8

Figure 4 Comparison of temperature-dependent germination of fresh seeds of Brassica napus (closed dots) and two Brassica rapa accessions collected near Maarssen (1, open diamonds; 2, open squares).

Figure 9

Table 6 Linear regression of days until germination (D) as a function of temperature (T in °C)