Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T23:29:14.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Testing local-scale panmixia provides insights into the cryptic ecology, evolution, and epidemiology of metazoan animal parasites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2012

MARY J. GORTON
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, 3258 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA
EMILY L. KASL
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, 3258 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA
JILLIAN T. DETWILER
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, 3258 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA
CHARLES D. CRISCIONE*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, 3258 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, 3258 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA. Tel: +979 845 0917. Fax: +979 845 2891. E-mail: ccriscione@mail.bio.tamu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

When every individual has an equal chance of mating with other individuals, the population is classified as panmictic. Amongst metazoan parasites of animals, local-scale panmixia can be disrupted due to not only non-random mating, but also non-random transmission among individual hosts of a single host population or non-random transmission among sympatric host species. Population genetics theory and analyses can be used to test the null hypothesis of panmixia and thus, allow one to draw inferences about parasite population dynamics that are difficult to observe directly. We provide an outline that addresses 3 tiered questions when testing parasite panmixia on local scales: is there greater than 1 parasite population/species, is there genetic subdivision amongst infrapopulations within a host population, and is there asexual reproduction or a non-random mating system? In this review, we highlight the evolutionary significance of non-panmixia on local scales and the genetic patterns that have been used to identify the different factors that may cause or explain deviations from panmixia on a local scale. We also discuss how tests of local-scale panmixia can provide a means to infer parasite population dynamics and epidemiology of medically relevant parasites.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
Figure 0

Table 1. Glossary of terms in review

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Outline of the 3 tiered questions (in bordered boxes) to ask when testing for panmixia in local-scale analyses of parasite populations. Ovals below the ‘Yes’ answers designate the potential reasons behind the observed deviations from panmixia and are addressed in detail within each subheading of the review. FIS quantifies the deviation from expected heterozygosity under Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Results from individual based Principle Coodinate Analyses (PCoA) used to test for possible underlying cryptic genetic strucuture in parasite populations. (A) PCoA revealed 3 clusters within a sample of trematodes (Lecithochririum fusiforme). Shapes correspond to the 3 cryptic populations identified by Bayesian cluster analyses. There is near complete agreement between the two analyses in the assignment of individuals to the 3 clusters. (B) Shapes correspond to the population of origin for Teladorsagia circumcincta collected from 4 French goat farms. Samples to the right of the figure separate out and represent the cryptic species. Notice that farm FrMe is largely composed of the cryptic species, but also has several worms that cluster with the ‘standard’ species. There was significant FST between all comparisons of farm FrMe to the other 3 farms, but there was no genetic differentiation among the other 3 farms. (C) Shapes represent the 3 morphotypes of Teladorsagia circumcincta. Notice there is no underlying pattern of structure between the 3 groups, indicating a single species. All 3 studies used nuclear microsatellite markers. Figures were reproduced with permission from Criscione et al. (2011); Grillo et al. (2007); and Grillo et al. (2008), respectively.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Relationship between the variance in the number of copies per clone (VNC) observed in natural infrapopulations of Schistosomes mansoni and FIS. Notice that as VNC increases FIS becomes more negative. VNC was used as a proxy for the variance in reproductive success of clones. Infrapopulations where only 1 clone was present were omitted from this data set because it is not possible to compute VNC for such infrapopulations (see Prugnolle et al. 2005b). Reproduced with permission from Prugnolle et al. (2005b).

Figure 4

Table 2. Impact of clonal transmission on FST among digenean infrapopulations when copies of multilocus genotypes (MLGs) are included or reduced to one copy within a host