Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T08:24:53.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A rapid method of species identification of wild chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) via electrophoresis of hemoglobin proteins in sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel (SDS–PAGE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

J.T. Oh
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Seton Hall University, South Orange, New Jersey 07079, USA
J.H. Epler
Affiliation:
461 Tiger Hammock Road, Crawfordville, Florida 32327, USA
C.S. Bentivegna*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Seton Hall University, South Orange, New Jersey 07079, USA
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +973 275-2905 E-mail: carolyn.bentivegna@shu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studying aquatic benthic macroinvertebrates (BMIs) in the field requires accurate taxonomic identification, which can be difficult and time consuming. Conventionally, head capsule morphology has been used to identify wild larvae of Chironomidae. However, due to the number of species and possible damage and/or deformity of their head capsules, another supporting approach for identification is needed. Here, we provide hemoglobin (Hb) protein in hemolymph of chironomids as a new biomarker that may help resolve some of the ambiguities and difficulties encountered during taxonomic identification. Chironomids collected from two locations in Maine and New Jersey, USA were identified to the genus level and in some cases to the species-level using head capsule and body morphologies. The head capsule for a particular individual was then associated with a corresponding Hb protein profile generated from sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE). Distinct Hb profiles were observed from one group (Thienemannimyia) and four genera (Chironomus, Cricotopus, Dicrotendipes, and Glyptotendipes) of chironomids. Several species were polymorphic, having more than one Hb profile and/or having bands of the same size as those of other species. However, major bands and the combination of bands could distinguish individuals at the genus and sometimes species-level. Overall, this study showed that Hb profiles can be used in combination with head capsule morphology to identify wild chironomids.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Table 1. Range of water quality parameters at the four chironomid collection sites.

Figure 1

Table 2. Chironomid taxonomy based on head capsule morphology. Chironomids were collected from four different sampling sites during 2007–2012. n is the total number of chironomids analyzed for a particular species. Subfamily of each species is also provided.

Figure 2

Table 3. LC–MS data of the most abundantly identified proteins in Hb band 5 separated by SDS–PAGE. CTT represents Chironomus thummi thummi, which now is called Chironomus riparius. AA represents the total number of amino acids in the sequence.

Figure 3

Fig. 1. Comparison of head capsule with Hb proteins of Chironomus riparius. Presented are (a) head capsule at 10X magnification and (b) MW ladder (L) and Hb protein profiles 1–3 (P1, P2, and P3, respectively). C. riparius has a mandible with three dark inner teeth indicated by the solid arrow (a). One species was associated with one head capsule morphology (a) and three Hb profiles (b). P1 was found in all chironomids collected in Rahway River, NJ, n=4. P2 and P3 were in chironomids collected in Kearny Marsh, NJ, n=5 for each profile.

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Comparison of head capsule with Hb proteins of Chironomus sp. ME1. Presented are (a) head capsule at 10X magnification and (b) MW ladder (L) and Hb protein profile 4 (P4). Distinctions between C. riparius and this unknown species are the two dark inner teeth of the mandible indicated by the solid arrow and a reduced outer tooth on the mentum indicated by the dotted arrow (a). One species associated with one head capsule morphology (a) and one Hb profile (b). This single Hb protein profile was found in all individuals of this unknown species collected at Bass Harbor, ME, n=9.

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Comparison of head capsule with Hb proteins of Cricotopus bicinctus. Presented are (a) head capsule at 10X magnification and (b) MW ladder (L) and Hb protein profile 5 (P5). The solid arrow (a) indicates the inner teeth of the mandible. One species was associated with one head capsule morphology (a) and one Hb profile (b). This single Hb protein profile was found in all individuals of this species, which was only found at Rahway River, NJ, n=3.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Comparison of head capsule with Hb proteins of Dicrotendipes modestus. Presented are (a) head capsule at 10X magnification and (b) MW ladder (L) and Hb protein profile 6 (P6). The solid arrow (a) indicates the ventromental plate. One species was associated with one head capsule morphology (a) and one Hb profile (b) in all individuals collected. D. modestus was found at three of the four sites investigated – North East Creek, ME (n=3); Bass Harbor, ME (n=1); and Rahway River, NJ (n=6).

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Comparison of head capsule with Hb proteins of Glyptotendipes paripes. Presented are (a) head capsule at 10X magnification and (b) MW ladder (L) and Hb protein profiles 7 and 8 (P7 and P8, respectively). Common traits of G. paripes include the smooth anterior margin of the ventromental plate indicated by the dotted arrow and the darkened internal area posterior to the mandible indicated by the solid arrow. One species was associated with one head capsule morphology (a) and two Hb protein profiles (b). Both profiles were found in chironomids collected at Kearny Marsh, NJ, n=11 for P7 and n=3 for P8.

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Comparison of head capsule with Hb proteins of Glyptotendipes sp. Presented are (a) head capsule at 10X magnification and (b) MW ladder (L) and Hb protein profiles 9–11 (P9, P10, and P11, respectively). The solid arrow (a) indicates the larval mentum. One species was associated with one head capsule morphology (a) and three Hb protein profiles (b). All three profiles were found in chironomids collected at Kearny Marsh, NJ, n=4, 8, and 2, for profiles P9, P10, and P11, respectively.

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Comparison of head capsule with Hb proteins of Thienemannimyia group sp. Presented are (a) head capsule at 10X magnification and (b) MW ladder (L) and Hb protein profile 12 (P12). The solid arrow (a) indicates a short apical tooth on the mandible. One species was associated with one head capsule morphology (a) and one Hb protein profile (b). The Thienemannimyia group sp. individuals were collected at Rahway River, NJ, n=2.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Comparison of all Hb protein profiles. Bands of each profile (P1–P12) were plotted against MW of Hb protein ranging from 17.5 to 8 kDa. A black line within a column indicates the presence of a band at that particular MW. Band intensity was not considered in this analysis. Profiles are grouped by genus.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Changes in Hb protein throughout the life cycle of a laboratory population of Chironomus riparius. Dotted box indicates 12.5 kDa band, which was found to be unique to C. riparius and observed to be continuously synthesized throughout the life cycle. Each lane presents one of three samples collected at the same time point. Lane 1: second instar, lane 2: third instar, lanes 3–6: fourth instar, lane 7: ladder, lane 8: pupa, and lane 9: adult (Table 4). Dotted black arrow indicates newly synthesized band. Black arrow indicates loss of the original 15.5 kDa band, which was present starting at fourth instar.

Figure 12

Table 4. Mean head capsule width (mm) for a laboratory strain of C. riparius used in a developmental study. Mean head capsule width was calculated from the five larvae whose hemolymph was combined to make a representative Hb sample (fig. 9).