Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T17:59:50.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Southeast Asian waxy maize (Zea mays L.), a resource for amylopectin starch quality types?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2016

Peter Stamp
Affiliation:
Institute for Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Simona Eicke
Affiliation:
Institute for Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Sansern Jampatong
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Nakhonpathom 73140, Thailand
Ham Le-Huy
Affiliation:
Agricultural Genetics Institute, VAAS, Pham Van Dong Street, 9 Hanoi, Vietnam
Choosak Jompuk
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Nakhonpathom 73140, Thailand
Felix Escher
Affiliation:
Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Sebastian Streb*
Affiliation:
Institute for Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: sstreb@ethz.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Amylose-free (waxy) maize has been a vegetable (cooked ears) and staple food in Southeast Asia for centuries, resulting in hundreds of landraces (LRs) across the region. The recessive waxy allele induces soft grains with preferred cooking and flavour properties. We hypothesized that eating preferences resulted in the additional selection for different starch properties, reflected in altered starch granule morphology or amylopectin structure. A total of 41 LRs were available as starting material that had been used by different ethnic groups in Vietnam and Thailand. Unluckily, some LR were not pure waxy, but we successfully regained the original pure waxy status for most. Twenty LR were chosen for analysis of starch traits according to their purity. Four different waxy mutations were identified, including two unknown alleles. This is a strong proof for parallel independent selection of waxy maize in the region. Starch granule morphology and size were similar among all LRs. Gelatinization properties differed only between waxy and wild-type LR, and all waxy LR were comparable to a commercial waxy hybrid. The fine structure of waxy amylopectin had fewer short chains compared with that in wild-type. So far, the differences observed in starch properties are likely associated exclusively with the waxy trait. Despite the strong selection for amylose-free starch, there was no evidence for additional region wide selection for other special starch properties in our collection. In conclusion, all analyses did not encourage further targeted research on allelic variation of other starch metabolism genes for future use in the food and feed industry.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2016 
Figure 0

Table 1. Amylose content and DSC transition parameters of starch from different LRs

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Origin and waxy alleles of Thai and Vietnamese LRs. (a) Map of south-east Asia and origin of the different LRs used in this study. Amylose-free LRs (waxy/waxy) are shown in yellow, LRs with mixed background (WAXY/waxy) in green and wild-type plants (WAXY/WAXY) in black. (b) Mutations in the WAXY gene found in LRs. Different alleles are named responding to the mutation site. I2 has a 4 bp deletion in intron 2, changing the splice site (AG to AT), E5/I5 is an transposon insertion in exon 5, E7/I7 is a 30 bp deletion in exon 7 and intron 7 and E10 is a 15 bp deletion in exon 10 both described earlier for Chinese LRs (Fan et al., 2008). (c) List of pure amylose-free LRs and the identified waxy alleles.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Fine structure of amylopectin synthesized in LRs. CLD of starch in two representative LR, one wild-type WAXY/WAXY, TH07 (dotted grey line, diamond) and one amylose-free waxy/waxy, V01 (red line, empty circle), plotted against the waxy/WxH (black line, filled circle). Arrow indicates d.p. 6. Peak areas were summed and the areas of individual peaks calculated as a percentage of the total ± standard error of four biological replicates.

Figure 3

Table 2. Size distribution of starch granules in LR based on the relative starch granule volume

Supplementary material: File

Stamp supplementary material

Tables S1-S4

Download Stamp supplementary material(File)
File 28.1 KB