Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T14:02:55.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The missing focus on women’s health in the First 1,000 days approach to nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2020

Mai-Lei Woo KinshellaOpen the ORCID record for Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella[Opens in a new window],
Sophie E Moore and
Rajavel Elango
Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children’s and Women’s Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Sophie E Moore
Affiliation:
Department of Women & Children’s Health, King’s College London, London, UKMRC Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia
Rajavel Elango*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, BC Children’s and Women’s Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6H 3V4, CanadaSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
*
*Corresponding author: Email relango@bcchr.ubc.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The First 1,000 Days approach highlights the time between conception and a child’s second birthday as a critical period where adequate nutrition is essential for adequate development and growth throughout the child’s life and potentially onto their own offspring. Based on a review of relevant literature, this commentary explores the First 1,000 Days approach with a maternal lens. While the primary objective of the First 1,000 Days approach to nutrition is to reduce child malnutrition rates, particularly chronic undernutrition in the form of stunting, interventions are facilitated through mothers in terms of promoting healthy behaviours such as exclusive breast-feeding and attention to her nutritional status during pregnancy and lactation. Though these interventions were facilitated through women, women’s health indicators are rarely tracked and measured, which we argue represents a missed opportunity to strengthen the evidence base for associations between maternal nutrition and women’s health outcomes. Limited evidence on the effects of dietary interventions with pregnant and lactating mothers on women’s health outcomes hinders advocacy efforts, which then contributes to lower prioritisation and less research.

Keywords

Maternal and child nutritionFirst 1,000 DaysWomen’s healthGender inequities

Information

Type
Commentary
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 24 , Issue 6 , April 2021, pp. 1526 - 1530
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

A growing body of literature points to how sufficient nutrition during the First 1,000 Days, from conception to the child’s second birthday, is essential for proper brain development, healthy growth and immune system that impacts the entirety of the child’s life and beyond(Reference Wrottesley, Lamper and Pisa1–5). In 2019, 144 million children under five were stunted, including 29·1 % of children in Africa and 21·8 % of children in Asia, which is indicative of chronic undernutrition within the first 1,000 days of life(5). Stunting is associated with cognitive impairment, reduced potential in school and increased risk of chronic disease later in life(Reference Hoddinott, Behrman and Alderman6–Reference Victora, Adair and Fall10). Additionally, malnutrition is intergenerational, as daughters of malnourished mothers are more likely to have low birth weight (LBW) children(Reference Delisle11,12) .

The 2008 Maternal and Child Undernutrition Lancet series advanced the idea that childhood stunting was the best measure of malnutrition and its long-term costs to society(Reference Victora, Adair and Fall10). Coined during a meeting with several development groups hosted by the World Bank in April 2010, the ‘First 1,000 Days’ mobilised the findings of the 2008 Lancet series to build momentum and advocacy in international development and global health(Reference Thurow7). The subsequent 2013 Lancet Series on Maternal and Child Nutrition further demonstrated early undernutrition as a serious hidden cause of child mortality(Reference Black, Victora and Walker3), increased risk of adult chronic diseases(Reference Bhutta13) and described building momentum with Scaling Up Nutrition programmes(Reference Nabarro14). The Scaling Up Nutrition movement represents a commitment by sixty-one low- and middle-income countries and four Indian States (as of 2020) to meet the Sustainable Development Goal Two of eliminating global hunger by 2030 by reducing stunting through focusing on the First 1,000 Days window(15–17).

However, with a focus on child health benefits, maternal nutritional status in terms of underlying malnutrition and women’s health outcomes lack explicit focus, such as maternal mortality, morbidities and well-being indicators. Though First 1,000 Days nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions are largely facilitated through pregnant and lactating mothers, women’s health indicators may not be tracked and measured, which we argue represents a missed opportunity for developing interventions that are purposefully designed to improve both maternal and child health.

Maternal nutritional status and health outcomes

Maternal malnutrition is widely prevalent globally. A systematic review found that average intakes of protein, fat and total energy intakes were lower among pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries than in high-income countries and were frequently insufficient in a number of micronutrients, for example, folate, Fe, Ca and Zn(Reference Lee, Talegawkar and Merialdi18). Two linked reviews also revealed consistently suboptimal intakes of folate, Fe, vitamin D, fibre and energy among pregnant mothers in high-income countries(Reference Blumfield, Hure and Macdonald-Wicks19,Reference Blumfield, Hure and MacDonald-Wicks20) . Maternal undernutrition contributes to adverse effects in both mothers and infants including increased caesarean delivery rates and risk of maternal mortality in mothers and intra-uterine growth restriction in infants, which subsequently increases the risk for birth asphyxia and neonatal infections(Reference Black, Allen and Bhutta8,Reference Mason, Shrimpton and Saldanha21) . Low maternal BMI and anaemia are also associated with lethargy, reduced physical activity, diminished work capacity and increased risk for maternal mortality(Reference Mason, Shrimpton and Saldanha21).

Simultaneously, obesity is also prevalent in low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries, particularly among economically poor populations(Reference Perez-Escamilla, Bermudez and Buccini22–Reference Devlieger, Benhalima and Damm25). Maternal obesity is associated with serious adverse pregnancy outcomes including early pregnancy loss, preterm birth, stillbirth, gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders, higher rates of labour induction and caesarean delivery, as well as associated with childhood obesity(Reference Siddiqui, Azria and Howell26–Reference Heslehurst, Vieira and Akhter31).

Maternal nutritional interventions

Nutrition-specific interventions and programmes include micronutrient supplementation and fortification, optimal exclusive breast-feeding and complementary feeding practices, and disease prevention and management to directly impact maternal, infant and child health outcomes(Reference Christian, Mullany and Hurley32). While the primary objective of the First 1,000 Days approach to nutrition is to reduce rates of stunting among children, mothers play an important role in facilitating interventions through strengthening her nutritional status during pregnancy and lactation. For example, a systematic review of thirty-two observational studies highlighted the potential of preconceptional and first trimester vitamin and mineral supplementation to reduce the risk of neural tube defects, LBW and preterm deliveries(Reference Ramakrishnan, Grant and Goldenberg33), while a number of maternal multiple micronutrient (MMN) supplementation trials found significant reductions in LBW(Reference Christian, Mullany and Hurley32,Reference van Lettow, Tweya and Rosenberg34,Reference Fawzi, Msamanga and Urassa35) .

Nutrition-sensitive interventions also highlight the importance of underlying factors that indirectly impact maternal and child nutrition, such as women’s empowerment(Reference Christian, Mullany and Hurley32,Reference Santoso, Kerr and Hoddinott36,Reference Ruel and Alderman37) . Women’s empowerment, the process of increasing agency and the status of women, influences household access to resources including allocation for child’s health and nutrition(Reference Santoso, Kerr and Hoddinott36). Four systematic reviews in the past 4 years evaluated the association between women’s empowerment and child nutrition. They showed promise for improving child health outcomes but described methodological challenges in various definitions of empowerment(Reference Santoso, Kerr and Hoddinott36,Reference Carlson, Kordas and Murray-Kolb38–Reference Pratley40) . While the value of women’s empowerment is acknowledged intrinsically to be beneficial to women and as a means to improve household nutrition, the reviews focused on the latter.

A gap in measuring women’s health and nutritional status

Though the interventions were facilitated through maternal nutrition, the measurement of women’s health outcomes was overlooked. For example, a large MMN supplementation trial in Tanzania conducted with 8468 HIV-negative pregnant women focused on child health outcomes, with LBW, prematurity and fetal death as the primary outcomes measured(Reference Fawzi, Msamanga and Urassa35). The trial, which found that supplementation significantly reduced the risk of LBW potentially due to lower risk of maternal anaemia, also followed a subset of children up to 11–14 years old. Follow-up on women’s health outcomes was not reported, even as potential confounders for child development outcomes(Reference Sudfeld, Manji and Darling41). More recently, the ‘Women First’ Trial with 7387 women in Guatemala, India, Pakistan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo found that periconceptual maternal MMN supplementation improved fetal growth-related birth outcomes(Reference Hambidge, Westcott and Garcés42). However, a recent Editorial noted the lack of maternal indicators measured in this trial including measures of maternal nutritional status, maternal morbidities, mental health and overall well-being(Reference Bhutta43). A 2017 Cochrane review of MMN supplementation for women during pregnancy included sixteen trials that reported effects on preterm births and LBW and fifteen trials that reported small-for-gestational age but only five trials reported maternal anaemia, four trials reporting caesarean section rates, three that reported maternal mortality rates and one trial that reported pre-eclampsia(Reference Haider and Bhutta44). Other maternal health outcomes (placental abruption, premature rupture of membranes, maternal well-being or satisfaction) were not reported by any of the trials. This represents a measurement gap in the evidence base particularly in health outcomes for women.

Nutritional interventions focused on the First 1,000 Days have not had the magnitude of effects on reducing childhood stunting as expected. Even with increases in the global rates of exclusive breast-feeding in the first 6 months to 44 % in 2019, rates of stunting remain persistently high at approximately 1 in 5 children (21·3 %)(5). In a specific example from rural Gambia, four decades of intensive health and nutritional interventions helped to halve childhood undernutrition rates but stunting remained persistently high at 30 %(Reference Nabwera, Fulford and Moore45). Some have suggested that highly publicised maternal and child initiatives, such as ‘safe motherhood’ and ‘child survival’, may not have had the expected impact because too little attention has been given to the nutritional status of women, including mothers(Reference Tinker, Daly and Green46) and the challenges they face in access to quality nutrition and care throughout their lives(Reference Mora and Nestel47). Mora and Nestel highlight the need for biologically meaningful indicators to screen undernutrition in women beyond Hb for anaemia, BMI and mid-upper arm circumference, which are inadequate for understanding micronutrient deficiencies(Reference Mora and Nestel47). In addition, attention to monitoring health outcomes in women is also lacking; for example, the follow-up for the maternal micronutrient study in Tanzania(Reference Sudfeld, Manji and Darling41) and the Women First trial that overlooked measuring outcomes in women(Reference Hambidge, Westcott and Garcés42,Reference Bhutta43) .

The vicious cycle of the research-advocacy gap

While the importance of maternal nutrition for the mothers may be implicitly understood in interventions within the First 1,000 Days approach, the missing explicit focus has led to a lack of evidence-based data. Christian and colleagues highlight in their review that the role of poor nutritional status during pregnancy and risk of maternal mortality are ‘unrecognized and underappreciated’ due to lack of funding and sufficient data to explore the association(Reference Christian, Mullany and Hurley32). The research-advocacy gap is a vicious cycle where limited knowledge leads to lower prioritisation, which equates to less research on the topic.

Many of these themes are similar to the issues raised by the Safe Motherhood Initiative pioneers in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Launched in 1987, Safe Motherhood Initiative was developed to counter the relative neglect of women’s health within the attention on child survival and the failure to address maternal health as intrinsically valuable, beyond its impact on child health(Reference AbouZahr48,Reference Thaddeus and Maine49) . Described as a ‘measurement trap’, limited data mutually reinforced low priority of maternal health(Reference Graham and Campbell50). Quality maternal health data are required to establish levels and trends, to identify determinants of risk and for evaluating the effectiveness of maternal health programming(Reference Graham and Campbell50). Consequently, a lack of quality maternal health data is both a result and contributor to the neglect of maternal health as a priority topic. Taken in the context of maternal and child nutrition, the relative gap in knowledge on the impact of maternal dietary interventions on the women themselves makes the topic hard to discuss and advocate for, which then contributes to lower prioritisation and less research. To help fill the current research-advocacy gap, there is a need for research on the impact of maternal nutrition on women’s health and understanding the gendered contexts of food and nutrition security. It is a missed opportunity that maternal mortality and morbidity outcomes, as well as maternal satisfaction, are not routinely measured in nutritional studies within the First 1,000 Days, such as in maternal MMN supplementation trials.

Conclusion

While the First 1,000 Days approach explores an intergenerational cycle of poverty and malnutrition through impacts on infants, there is also a need to understand the processes of entrenching poverty and malnutrition between inadequacies in maternal diet, adverse health outcomes for women and contextual factors, with the mothers at the centre. While mothers are targeted to facilitate nutritional interventions to improve infant health outcomes, the measurement of health outcomes in women is lacking. There is a great hope and potential for nutrition to strengthen infant growth and the society they will live in, but our vast dreams for the future cannot neglect the potential for benefits for women and her own life in the here and now.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements: This manuscript is part of the PRECISE (PREgnancy Care Integrating translational Science, Everywhere) Network. The authors would like to express their gratitude to the PRECISE Team for their support. In particular, we would especially like to thank PRECISE co-Principal Investigators, Professor Peter von Dadelszen and Professor Laura Magee, and Programme Managers, Marianne Vidler, Rachel Craik and Meriel Flint-O’Kane. Financial support: This publication received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. M.W.K. is supported by the Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship funded by the Government of Canada through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authorship: M.W.K. conceptualised the research, completed the literature review and drafted the initial draft. S.E.M. and R.E. supervised the process, contributed to interpreting the data, gave advice on the structure of the paper and critically reviewed all versions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Ethics of human subject participation: Not applicable.

References

Wrottesley, SV, Lamper, C & Pisa, PT (2015) Review of the importance of nutrition during the first 1000 d: maternal nutritional status and its associations with fetal growth and birth, neonatal and infant outcomes among African women. J Dev Orig Health Dis 7, 144–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, JK, Salam, RA, Imdad, A et al. (2016) Infant and young child growth. Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health: Disease Control Priorities, 3rd ed. Washington, DC, USA: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.Google ScholarPubMed
Black, RE, Victora, CG, Walker, SP et al. (2013) Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 382, 427–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barros, AJD, Ronsmans, C, Axelson, H et al. (2012) Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in countdown to 2015: a retrospective review of survey data from 54 countries. Lancet 379, 1225–1233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAO, IFAD, UNICEF et al. (2020) The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020: Transforming Food Systems for Affordable Healthy Diets. Rome: FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO.Google Scholar
Hoddinott, J, Behrman, JR, Alderman, H et al. (2015) The economic rationale for investing in stunting reduction. Matern Child Nutr 9, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurow, R (2016) The First 1000 d: A Crucial Time for Mothers and Children – and the World. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Black, RE, Allen, LH, Bhutta, ZA et al. (2008) Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 371, 243–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton, R (2008) Maternal and child undernutrition: an urgent opportunity. Lancet 371, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victora, CG, Adair, L, Fall, C et al. (2008) Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital. Lancet 371, 340–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delisle, HF (2008) Poverty: the double burden of malnutrition in mothers and the intergenerational impact. Ann New York Acad Sci 1136, 172–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sub-Committee on Nutrition (2000) Administrative Committee on Coordination. 4th report on the world nutrition situation. Nutrition throughout the life cycle. Geneva: ACC/SCN/WHO.Google Scholar
Bhutta, ZA (2013) Early nutrition and adult outcomes: pieces of the puzzle. Lancet 382, 486–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nabarro, D (2013) Global child and maternal nutrition—the SUN rises. Lancet 382, 666–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Scaling up Nutrition (SUN) Movement (2020) SUN Movement: Strategy and Roadmap (2016–2020). Available at: https://scalingupnutrition.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/SR_20160901_ENG_web_pages.pdf (accessed August 2020).Google Scholar
The Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) Movement (2020) Nourishing people and planet together: Scaling up Nutrition (SUN) Movement Progress Report 2019. Available at: https://scalingupnutrition.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/SUN-Annual-Report-2019-ENG_web_FINAL.pdf (accessed August 2020).Google Scholar
SUN Movement (2019) The history of the SUN Movement. Available at: https://scalingupnutrition.org/about-sun/the-history-of-the-sun-movement/ (accessed July 2019).Google Scholar
Lee, SE, Talegawkar, SA, Merialdi, M et al. (2013) Dietary intakes of women during pregnancy in low- and middle-income countries. Public Health Nutr 16, 1340–1353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumfield, ML, Hure, AJ, Macdonald-Wicks, L et al. (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis of micronutrient intakes during pregnancy in developed countries. Nutr Rev 7, 118–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumfield, ML, Hure, AJ, MacDonald-Wicks, L et al. (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of energy and macronutrient intakes during pregnancy in developed countries. Nutr Rev 70, 322–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, JB, Shrimpton, R, Saldanha, LS et al. (2014) The first 500 days of life: policies to support maternal nutrition. Glob Health Action 7, 23623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez-Escamilla, R, Bermudez, O, Buccini, GS et al. (2018) Nutrition disparities and the global burden of malnutrition. BMJ 361, k2252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popkin, BM, Corvalan, C & Grummer-Strawn, LM (2020) Dynamics of the double burden of malnutrition and the changing nutrition reality. Lancet 395, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onubi, OJ, Marais, D, Aucott, L et al. (2016) Maternal obesity in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Public Health 38, e218–e311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devlieger, R, Benhalima, K, Damm, P et al. (2016) Maternal obesity in Europe: where do we stand and how to move forward? A scientific paper commissioned by the European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 201, 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddiqui, A, Azria, E, Howell, EA et al. (2019) Associations between maternal obesity and severe maternal morbidity: findings from the French EPIMOMS population-based study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 33, 7–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mwanamsangu, AH, Mahande, MJ, Mazuguni, FS et al. (2020) Maternal obesity and intrapartum obstetric complications among pregnant women: retrospective cohort analysis from medical birth registry in Northern Tanzania. Obes Sci Pract 6, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, JA, Brown, CM, Barger, B et al. (2019) Influence of maternal obesity on labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Midwifery Womens Health 64, 55–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poston, L, Caleyachetty, R, Cnattingius, S et al. (2016) Preconceptional and maternal obesity: epidemiology and health consequences. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4, 1025–1036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitanchez, D & Chavatte-Palmer, P (2018) Review shows that maternal obesity induces serious adverse neonatal effects and is associated with childhood obesity in their offspring. Acta Paediatr 107, 1156–1165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heslehurst, N, Vieira, R, Akhter, Z et al. (2019) The association between maternal body mass index and child obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 16, e1002817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christian, P, Mullany, LC, Hurley, KM et al. (2015) Nutrition and maternal, neonatal, and child health. Semin Perinatol 39, 361–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramakrishnan, U, Grant, F, Goldenberg, T et al. (2012) Effect of women’s nutrition before and during early pregnancy on maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 26, 285–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Lettow, M, Tweya, H, Rosenberg, NE et al. (2017) Baseline characteristics of study sites and women enrolled in a three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial: PMTCT uptake and retention (pure) Malawi. Reprod Health 14, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawzi, WW, Msamanga, GI, Urassa, W et al. (2007) Vitamins and perinatal outcomes among HIV-negative women in Tanzania. N Engl J Med 356 1423–1431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santoso, MV, Kerr, RB, Hoddinott, J et al. (2019) Role of women’s empowerment in child nutrition outcomes: a systematic review. Adv Nutr 10, 1138–1151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruel, MT & Alderman, H (2013) Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help to accelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition? Lancet 382, 536–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, GJ, Kordas, K & Murray-Kolb, LE (2015) Associations between women’s autonomy and child nutritional status: a review of the literature. Matern Child Nutr 11, 452–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, K, Ruel, M, Ferguson, E et al. (2015) Women’s empowerment and child nutritional status in South Asia: a synthesis of the literature. Matern Child Nutr 11, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pratley, P (2016) Associations between quantitative measures of women’s empowerment and access to care and health status for mothers and their children: a systematic review of evidence from the developing world. Soc Sci Med 169, 119–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sudfeld, CR, Manji, KP, Darling, AM et al. (2019) Effect of antenatal and infant micronutrient supplementation on middle childhood and early adolescent development outcomes in Tanzania. Eur J Clin Nutr 73, 1283–1290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hambidge, KM, Westcott, JE, Garcés, A et al. (2019) A multicountry randomized controlled trial of comprehensive maternal nutrition supplementation initiated before conception: the Women First trial. Am J Clin Nutr 109, 457–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhutta, ZA (2019) Balancing the benefits of maternal nutritional interventions; Time to put women first! Am J Clin Nutr 109, 249–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haider, BA & Bhutta, ZA (2017) Multiple-micronutrient supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4, CD004905.Google ScholarPubMed
Nabwera, HM, Fulford, AJ, Moore, SE et al. (2017) Growth faltering in rural Gambian children after four decades of interventions: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Glob Heal 5, e208–e216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinker, A, Daly, P, Green, C et al. (1994) Women’s Health and Nutrition: Making a Difference. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora, JO & Nestel, PS (2000) Improving prenatal nutrition in developing countries: strategies, prospects, and challenges. Am J Clin Nutr 71, 1353S–1363S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AbouZahr, C (2003) Safe motherhood: a brief history of the global movement 1947–2002. Br Med Bull 67, 13–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thaddeus, S & Maine, D (1994) Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 38, 1091–1110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, WJ & Campbell, OM (1992) Maternal health and the measurement trap. Soc Sci Med 35, 967–977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed