Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:25:50.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure evolution in L12 hardened Co-base superalloys during creep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2017

Yuzhi Li
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
Florian Pyczak*
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Geesthacht 21502, Germany
Jonathan Paul
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Geesthacht 21502, Germany
Michael Oehring
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Geesthacht 21502, Germany
Uwe Lorenz
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Geesthacht 21502, Germany
Zekun Yao
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: florian.pyczak@hzg.de

Abstract

The plastic deformation mechanisms and the microstructure development during creep deformation of L12-hardened Co-base superalloys show a number of unique features. The preferred orientation of rafting is determined by their positive lattice mismatch. In addition, the regular interfacial dislocation networks often found in rafted specimens of other types of superalloys do not form. While the ordered γ′-L12 precipitates are supposed to harden the material, they are actually found to be frequently cut by partial dislocations generating stacking faults. In this work, specimens from creep tests interrupted at different strains were investigated using transmission and scanning electron microscopy. By this, it is possible to find out which of these processes take place in which stage of creep deformation. For a better understanding of creep deformation, the balance between γ′ cutting and dislocation activity within the matrix channels is of special interest.

Figure 0

FIG. 1. Microstructure of (a) 8W, (b) 9W, and (c) 11W after solution heat treatment and aging for 200 h at 900 °C, representing the microstructure prior to creep testing; the image was taken using TEM in the multibeam condition. The inset shows the corresponding diffraction pattern.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Strain rate versus strain curves of 8W, 9W, and 11W tested at 850 °C.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Microstructure development of γ′ precipitates in 8W after creep at 850° under 400 MPa to (a) 0.07%, (b) 0.45%, (c) 1.2%, and (d) 4% plastic strain.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. Microstructure development of γ′ precipitates in 9W after creep at 850° under 460 MPa to (a) 0.07%, (b) 0.4%, (c) 1.1%, and (d) 3% plastic strain.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. (a) Length of γ′ precipitates in crept specimens of the 8W and 9W alloys measured along the direction perpendicular to the external stress axis; (b) width of horizontal γ matrix channels in crept specimens of alloys 8W and 9W measured in the direction parallel to the stress.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. Deformation structures of the 8W alloy—upper row: TEM foil parallel to stress axis (a) 0.07%, (b) 0.45%, (c) 1.2%, and (d) 4% plastic strain—lower row: TEM foil perpendicular to the stress axis (e) 0.07%, (f) 0.45%, (g) 1.2%, and (h) 4% plastic strain, deformed under a load of 400 MPa at 850 °C.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. Deformation structures in alloy 9W—upper row: TEM foil parallel to stress axis (a) 0.07%, (b) 0.4%, (c) 1.1%, and (d) 3% plastic strain—lower row: TEM foil perpendicular to stress axis (e) 0.07%, (f) 0.4%, (g) 1.1%, and (h) 3% plastic strain, deformed with a load of 460 MPa at 850 °C.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. Deformation structures imaged in TEM foils orientated perpendicular to the stress axis in (a) the 8W alloy at 3.6% strain (460 MPa @ 850 °C), (b) the 9W alloy at 3% strain (460 MPa @ 850 °C), and in (c) the 11W alloy at 3.6% strain (460 MPa @ 850 °C).