Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:09:57.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Innate immune response mechanisms in the intestinal epithelium: potential roles for mast cells and goblet cells in the expulsion of adult Trichinella spiralis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2008

P. A. KNIGHT*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
J. K. BROWN
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
A. D. PEMBERTON
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK. Tel: +0131 650 7348. Fax: +0131 651 3903. E-mail: pam.knight@ed.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Gastrointestinal infection with the nematode Trichinella spiralis is accompanied by a rapid and reversible expansion of the mucosal mast cell and goblet cell populations in the intestinal epithelium, which is associated with the release of their mediators into the gut lumen. Both goblet cell and mast cell hyperplasia are highly dependent on mucosal T-cells and augmented by the cytokines IL-4 and IL-13. However, the contribution of both mast and goblet cells, and the mediators they produce, to the expulsion of the adults of T. spiralis is only beginning to be elucidated through studies predominantly employing T. spiralis-mouse models. In the present article, we review the factors proposed to control T. spiralis-induced mucosal mast cell (MMC) and goblet cell differentiation in the small intestine, and focus on some key MMC and goblet cell effector molecules which may contribute to the expulsion of adult worms and/or inhibition of larval development.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Mucosal mast cell and goblet cell hyperplasia during Trichinella spiralis infection. Representative images of the jejunal mucosa of BALB/c mice before (A) and 7 (B), 14 (C) or 28 (D) days after infection with T. spiralis. Sections were probed with Mcpt-2 (red) and intelectin (green) specific antibodies, as markers for mucosal mast cells and goblet cells respectively. Nuclei were counterstained with SYBR Green I (blue). Goblet cells (horizontal arrows), paneth cells (arrowheads) and mucosal mast cells (vertical arrows) are highlighted. Note the pronounced goblet cell hyperplasia and peak ITLN expression on days 7–14 after infection, which is undetectable in uninfected jejunum and on day 28. Also note the predominantly intraepithelial location of mucosal mast cells on days 7–14 as opposed to day 28, and their absence in uninfected jejunum.

Figure 1

Table 1. Relative abundance of selected mast cell and goblet cell transcripts detected by expression profiling(Summary of some of the key findings from an analysis of the transcriptome of the jejunal epithelial compartment from uninfected and Trichinella spiralis-infected BALB/c mice, using Affymetrix MG-U74AV2 oligonucleotide microarrays (Knight et al.2004). Summarized are the findings for a selection of MMC- and goblet cell-derived transcripts, which were the most highly upregulated detected in the jejunal epithelium of T. spiralis-infected mice 14 days after primary challenge with 300 L3 by gavage. The mean signal level at day 0 (uninfected) and day 14 p.i. (post-infection), and fold change (mean Day 0 signal vs mean Day 14 signal), is shown. Greyed-out values were below the threshold level of detection (set at mean of 50). For comparative purposes, the effective fold-change includes instances where one of the values is below threshold of detection. P values are shown for signals which changed significantly on infection ((t-test with Welch correction; n=4 (P⩽0·05)). Upregulation of a selection of these transcripts was confirmed by RT-PCR analysis as indicated; where a complete temporal analysis was carried out using RNA samples collected on days 0–56 p.i. This is also summarized. Reproduced from Knight et al. (2004), with kind permission from Infection and Immunity.)

Figure 2

Table 2. Transcripts upregulated at least 10-fold in LS174T cells by both IL-4 and IL-13(LS174T goblet cell-like colon carcinoma cells were incubated with medium alone (n=4), or medium containing human IL-4 (1 ng/ml; n=4) or human IL-13 (1 ng/ml; n=4). Equal amounts of RNA were pooled from individual samples within each treatment group. Agilent human microarrays (Agilent whole human genome array G4112A) were used to compare (1) control vs IL-4 treatment, and (2) control vs IL-13 treatment. Data were normalized and ranked in order of fold-change (M. Craigon, Scottish Centre for Genomic Technology and Informatics). Transcripts showing >10-fold increase in both IL-4 and IL-13 treatment groups, listed below, were then analysed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR, which confirmed upregulation in each case (not shown).)