Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-03T17:24:12.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The fishing behaviour of Metopograpsus messor (Decapoda: Grapsidae) and the use of pneumatophore-borne vibrations for prey-localizing in an arid mangrove setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2019

Bruno Welter Giraldes*
Affiliation:
Environmental Science Center (ESC), Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
Mark Chatting
Affiliation:
Environmental Science Center (ESC), Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
David Smyth
Affiliation:
School of Natural and Built Environment, Queens University, Belfast, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Bruno Welter Giraldes, E-mail: bweltergiraldes@qu.edu.qa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study presents the first documented observations of a brachyuran crab's proactive fishing behaviour in conjunction with mangrove pneumatophores which are employed as prey-localization devices. All ecological data were recorded in situ using simple behavioural observations, visual census and field experiments. Field experiments were based on stimulus-response and ecological surveys on random displacement. Assemblages of Metopograpsus messor were observed daily performing a foraging/predatory tide-related cyclic behaviour pattern in an arid mangrove ecosystem which experiences challenging environmental conditions. Prey-localizing behaviour was observed during the flood tide when pneumatophore-borne vibrations were used to identify potential prey. The prey simulation field experiment (where a single pneumatophore was stimulated by knocking) showed that in >93% of instances a crab approached the exact pneumatophore being stimulated. As water levels increased during the tidal cycle M. messor was observed climbing pneumatophores. The crabs anchored themselves to the pneumatophore just above the water level with their pereiopods. The chelipeds were positioned in a pincher-like trap, and remained in a ‘capture-position’ waiting for prey to move within striking range. This characteristic fishing behaviour was performed daily by a population of M. messor. Ecological observations suggest that both these predatory behaviours are associated with the fish Aphanius dispar dispar in a direct prey–predator relation. Evidence suggests that these fishing behaviours evolved due to characteristics within the M. messor phylogeny (foraging in intertidal zones; daily displacement following tidal levels; high sensitivity to vibrations; and an opportunist diet) and its associated environment (presence of pneumatophores and high availability of a fish resource).

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2019 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the survey sites at Al-Khor and Al-Dhakira, Qatar. Highlighting the mangrove areas; the salt marshes and high densities of the mangrove tree Avicennia marina; and the entrance of the channels at the studied riparian zone.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Images of the studied mangrove, with (A) the entrance of the channels in the open-water areas near the sea; (B) the end of the channels in the semi-confined water areas in the peripheral mangrove zone, near the salt marshes; and the studied riparian zone (C) in open-water areas and (D) the semi-confined water areas.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Images of observation within the studied mangrove; (A) the riparian zone dividing the intertidal zone above and the subtidal zone in flood. With shoals of A. d. dispar invading the intertidal zone (B) with a shallow layer of water <4 cm and (C) with a higher water level >5 cm; and in the subtidal zone during the low tide (D) among the shrimp P. khori and (E) a shoal in shallow tide pools. Also, the illustration of E. orientalis within the flooded intertidal zone foraging/prey-localizing (M) with a vivid colour and (N) a pale coloured specimen after the capture of M. messor (arrow pointing to the prey).

Figure 3

Table 1. List of main species observed during the flood tide in the riparian zone of the channels in the arid mangrove of Qatar

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Ecological data; (A) the percentage of specimens of Metopograpsus messor (hiding in cavities, walking on the bottom, climbing the pneumatophores and climbing a tree), during the low tide, the flood tide (in the start) and after the water has risen some centimetres (flooding in the intertidal) and the high tide (with the pneumatophores totally flooded); (B) the percentage of times that M. messor identified or did not identify the vibration stimuli in the pneumatophore.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Images of the two observed behaviours displayed by Metopograpsus messor: the foraging/prey-localizing behaviour at the start of the flood tide with (A) the specimens concentrated in the riparian zone, (B) after the capture of a fish A. d. dispar and (C) a shrimp P. khori. The fishing behaviour on the flood tide after a heightened water level with (D) the specimens concentrated in the riparian zone, (E) a specimen in the ‘fishing position’ and (F) after the capture of a fish.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Relations linkage with the fishing behaviour displayed by Metopograpsus messor on the flood tide; with the observed position of each species: M. messor in the foraging/prey-localizing and fishing behaviour; A. d. dispar, E. orientalis and P. khori. (A) in the low tide; (B) at the beginning of the flood tide with just a small layer of water; (C) in the sequential flood tide progression.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Images in sequential moments A, B, C and D, illustrating the ‘knocking experiment’ to evaluate the ‘vibration sensibility’, when using a wooden stick as stimuli (St.) and selecting a single pneumatophore (Pn), vibrations were created simulating a fish with a specific knocking-spot (KS). In the first moment (A) four Metapograpsus messor (M1–4) were in the visual field near the knocking spot; in the second moment (B) the fifth specimen (M5) with reddish chela appeared in the visual field; in the third moment (C) while specimens (M1–3) keep observing and M4 moves far from the visual field, the fifth specimen (M5) arrives at approximately the knocking spot; in the fourth moment (D) the specimen with reddish chela (M5) reaches the knocking-spot and tries to catch the stick while two others (M1 and M3) carefully stay nearby.