Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T02:36:38.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Isolation enhancement of metamaterial structure MIMO antenna for WiMAX/WLAN/ITU band applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2022

Pasumarthi Suneetha*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Advanced Antenna Design Laboratory, Vignan's Institute of Information Technology (A), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
Kethavathu Srinivasa Naik
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Advanced Antenna Design Laboratory, Vignan's Institute of Information Technology (A), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
Pachiyannan Muthusamy
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Advanced RF Microwave & Wireless Communication Laboratory, Vignan's Foundation for Science Technology and Research (Deemed to be University), Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
*
Author for correspondence: Pasumarthi Suneetha, E-mail: rsss4m@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The μ-negative metamaterial (MNG) two-element MIMO antenna design was proposed in this article for WiMAX (2.5–2.8 GHz), WLAN (3.2–5.9 GHz), and ITU band (8.15−8.25 GHz) applications. The first design of the MIMO antenna operates at 2.7 and 4.9 GHz frequencies. In order to reduce the mutual coupling, a defective ground structure is used. For further isolation improvement, an MNG unit cell is placed in between the two radiating elements at a distance of 10 mm. The designed antenna elements have better than −23 dB coupling isolation between the two radiating elements. Moreover, with MNG an additional frequency of 8.2 GHz is obtained, which is useful for ITU band applications. The proposed antenna bandwidth is expanded by 19% in the lower operational band, 20% in the second operational band, and 32% in the higher frequency band with the MNG unit cell. From the analysis, the proposed antenna is suitable for WiMAX/WLAN/ITU band applications because of its low enveloped correlation coefficient, and highest directive gain and low mutual coupling between the radiating components. The proposed antenna was simulated, fabricated, and measured with the help of the Schwarz ZVL vector network analyzer and anechoic chamber. Both measured and simulated results are highly accurate and highly recommended for WiMAX/WLAN/ITU bands.

Information

Type
Metamaterials and Photonic Bandgap Structures
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Proposed single-element antenna. (a) Antenna 1; (b) antenna 2; (c) antenna 3; (d) proposed antenna; (e) S-parameter result of all the antennas.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Proposed single-element (a) S11 parameter result; (b) VSWR result.

Figure 2

Table 1. Dimensions of the proposed single-element antenna

Figure 3

Fig. 3. (a) Front view configuration of the 1 × 2 MIMO antenna (b) back view.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Reflection coeffiecient result of the MIMO antenna.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Surface current distribution of the MIMO antenna. (a) 2.7 GHz; (b) 5.2 GHz.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Proposed metamaterial-based MIMO antenna. (a) Front view; (b) unit cell.

Figure 7

Table 2. Dimensions of the proposed metamaterial unit cell

Figure 8

Fig. 7. S11 and S21 metamaterial-based MIMO antenna.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Surface current distribution at (a) 2.7 GHz; (b) 5.2 GHz; and (c) 8.2 GHz.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Radiation pattern at (a) 2.7 GHz; (b) 5.2 GHz; and (c) 8.2 GHz.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. The photographs of antenna under measurement for (a) radiation pattern; (b) gain; (c) radiation efficiency.

Figure 12

Table 3. Proposed antenna simulated and measured results

Figure 13

Fig. 11. MIMO characteristics plot (a) ECC; (b) DG.

Figure 14

Fig. 12. Prototype antenna (a) front view and (b) back view.

Figure 15

Fig. 13. Proposed antenna measured and simulated results.

Figure 16

Table 4. Comparison table for various MIMO antennas with existing work

Figure 17

Fig. 14. Unit-cell characteristics plot: (a) S-parameters; (b) effective permeability; (c) simulation set up of the unit cell; (d) two-port representation of unit cell.

Figure 18

Fig. 15. S-parameter result: (a) one and two unit cells; (b) three and four unit cells.

Figure 19

Fig. 16. Distance between metamaterial unit cells: (a) 1.5 mm; (b) 2.5 mm; (c) S-parameter of the 1.5 mm; (d) S-parameter of the 2.5 mm; (e) S-parameter of the 1.8 mm.