Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T16:54:56.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Copper–nickel oxide thin film library reactively co-sputtered from a metallic sectioned cathode

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2013

Wolfgang Burgstaller
Affiliation:
Institute for Chemical Technology of Inorganic Materials, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 4040 Linz, Austria
Martina Hafner
Affiliation:
Institute for Chemical Technology of Inorganic Materials, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 4040 Linz, Austria
Michael Voith
Affiliation:
Institute for Chemical Technology of Inorganic Materials, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 4040 Linz, Austria
Andrei Ionut Mardare
Affiliation:
Institute for Chemical Technology of Inorganic Materials, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 4040 Linz, Austria
Achim Walter Hassel*
Affiliation:
Institute for Chemical Technology of Inorganic Materials, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 4040 Linz, Austria
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: achimwalter.hassel@jku.at

Abstract

A Cu–Ni sectioned cathode made up of two hemicycles of each of the metals was used for reactive co-sputtering of a thin film combinatorial library of Cu–Ni oxides covering a total compositional spread of 63 at.%. The thickness profiling of the library showed a nonuniform film thickness with a maximum region shifted toward the Cu side of the cathode. The presence of CuO, Cu2O, NiO, and metallic Cu–Ni alloys was identified during the scanning x-ray diffraction investigations along the compositional spread. A distinct structural zone was defined between Cu–14 at.% Ni and Cu–19 at.% Ni, where the scanning electron microscopy investigations showed a higher surface porosity combined with smaller grain sizes. This zone corresponds to the maximum film thickness region and correlates well with the position of the maximum work function of the Cu–Ni oxide films as mapped using a scanning Kelvin probe. During local corrosion studies focused on Cu dissolution, an improved corrosion resistance was identified in the Ni rich side of the compositional spread.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. (a) Two-component sectioned metallic Cu–Ni target with a zoomed view for indicating the close vicinity of the metals. The two metallic plates are fixed on an Al holder. (b) Photograph of the film deposited on two glass substrates labeled (1) and (2).

Figure 1

FIG. 2. (a) 3D scanning XRF analysis map of the Cu–Ni thin film oxide material library showing the film thickness d in dependence of the position on the substrate and (b) color coded XY projection of the thickness profile surface. In Fig. 2(b), the shift of the maximum thickness toward the Cu rich side of the substrate can be seen.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. EDX line scan analysis showing (a) the Cu, Ni, and O concentrations and (b) the recalculated Cu and Ni concentrations with respect to the position along the x-axis.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. SEM surface image of the Cu–Ni oxide library on selected positions along the sample. The figure shows the evolution of the grain size as well as a defined structural zone around Cu–17 at.% Ni.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. GIXRD patterns measured for selected positions on the surface of the Cu–Ni thin film library and reference x-ray diffractograms.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. (a) XPS surface spectra of Ni for selected compositions along the Cu–Ni thin film library. (b) XPS surface spectra of Cu for selected compositions along the Cu–Ni thin film library. The spectra show the presence of satellites for higher Ni contents indicating an enrichment of Cu2+ in the film. (c) The LMM Auger spectra of Cu for selected positions along the Cu–Ni thin film library an (d) Cu0 and Cu+ reference spectra showing a shoulder for the metallic Cu around 565 eV. (e) The corresponding Cu, Ni, and O concentrations on the surface measured by XPS.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. 3D plot of the work function mapping of the Cu–Ni oxide compositional spread on one glass substrate using a scanning Kelvin probe. For a distinct compositional zone (around 25–30 mm on the x-axis), a drop in the work function is measured.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. (a) A typical AAS dissolution curve for Cu in 0.1 M HCl and (b) normalized Cu mass for distinct positions along the sample with respect to the Cu–Ni concentration gradient.