Introduction
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a new coronavirus infection that was discovered in Wuhan, China in December 2019, has now been declared by the World Health Organization (Geneva, Switzerland) as a pandemic that has led to wide-spread panic and anxiety around the world. Reference Xu, Cai and Shen1 As the death toll from the spread of the virus has risen around the world, governments have imposed quarantines or social isolation in communities to protect lives. Following these restrictions, people in the community experienced sudden changes in their daily lives, and as a result, they limited their work activities. Consequently, as people decrease social interactions and increase the number of hours they stay at home, they may experience increased levels of anxiety and stress. Reference Schiavi, Spina and Zullo2 Previous studies have pointed out that major epidemics in the world have had a significant psychological burden on individuals. Reference Van Bortel, Basnayake and Wurie3
Increased mortality from the COVID-19 pandemic and drastic measures to enforce restrictions have led to an increase in psychological outcomes in different populations in most societies. Reference Omar, Dawood, Eid, Eldeeb, Munir and Arafat4 One of the behaviors that may be affected by quarantine and social distancing is sexual intercourse. Reference Liu, Waite, Shen and Wang5 According to the definition of the World Health Organization, sexual health requires a positive and respectful approach to sexual desires and relationships, as well as having pleasant and safe sexual experiences, free from coercion, discrimination, and violence. Reference Edwards and Coleman6
By virtue of restrictions imposed by various countries, as well as the general public’s fear of being infected, coronavirus outbreaks have changed social relations between individuals. These changes were such that they deprived individuals of the opportunity to adapt their physical and mental systems and put them under pressure. Reference Ludwig and Zarbock7 Grief caused by the prevailing conditions due to the spread of the virus, and exposure to numerous news related to the infected people and deaths, transformed people’s emotional stability. Everyday turmoil, lack of freedom of action, lack of independence, and feelings of helplessness led to feelings of disability in people, and as a result, people’s psychological distress affected their sexual activity. Reference Cocci, Presicce, Russo, Cacciamani, Cimino and Minervini8 Sexual desires are complex and involve numerous phenomena that include participation, behavior, attitude, identity, orientation, beliefs, and sexual activity. Reference Liu, Waite, Shen and Wang5
Sex is influenced by the interaction of biological, psychological, social, economic, political, cultural, legal, historical, religious, and spiritual factors. Reference Torales, O’Higgins, Castaldelli-Maia and Ventriglio9 Accordingly, it is logical to assume that sex life is profoundly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic at the individual and environmental levels. At the individual level, all forms of sexual contact carry the risk of transmitting the virus. Therefore, people should refrain from sexual contact for fear of transmitting the virus. At the environmental level, quarantine and social distancing can affect people’s sex lives. Reference Ko, Lu and Chen10
The effects of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) on human sexual and reproductive function, including whether or not the virus crosses the blood-barrier testicles and ovaries, or whether it affects the production of sex hormones, are still unknown. Reference Simoni and Hofmann11 However, fear of virus transmission is one of the consequences of the spread of coronavirus in communities, which leads to changes in sexual function and behavior in couples. In this case, the couple, due to fear of infection, limit and in some cases cut off physical contact from a simple kiss to full sexual intercourse. Also, long-term home quarantine and longer couples’ contacts within 24 hours lead to an increase in marital conflicts and thus intensifies negative feelings. Reference Ibarra, Mehrad and Mauro12 Moreover, the constant presence of children or other family members on the one hand and mandatory restrictions on the other hand led to the loss of privacy of couples and can exacerbate the problems in this area. Reference Panzeri, Ferrucci, Cozza and Fontanesi13
The results of a study comparing sexual behaviors among women in Turkey showed that although sexual desire and frequency of intercourse increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic, the quality of sexual life decreased significantly. This pandemic has been associated with decreased desire for pregnancy, decreased contraception in women, and increased menstrual disorders. Reference Yuksel and Ozgor14
Another consequence of the coronavirus pandemic is concerns about an increase in violence, including sexual violence. In many countries, governments have used housing policy extensively to control the effects of the virus, which has raised many concerns. Many international organizations have stated that housekeeping policy increases violence against women, and this is based on the effects of the previous SARS pandemic on increasing sexual partner violence against women. Reference Roesch, Amin, Gupta and García-Moreno15,Reference Durevall and Lindskog16
Although the COVID-19 pandemic is a new disease that has led to global effects on human life around the world and requires further studies in various fields, given the importance of sexual health in promoting health and the fertility of communities, studying the field of sexual life during this pandemic seems necessary. Therefore, the present study was to investigate the relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic with sexual function and intimate partner violence as a systematic review of the world.
Material and Methods
This study was a systematic review conducted to investigate the association between the COVID-19 pandemic with intimate partner violence and sexual function. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standard guideline was used to follow up the review process and report findings. Reference Liberati, Altman and Tetzlaff17
Search Strategy and Selection Criteria
This review focused on studies about intimate partner violence and sexual functions that were published in English-language journals up to the end of 2020. The databases of Scopus (Elsevier; Amsterdam, Netherlands), Web of Science (Thomson Reuters; New York, New York USA), PubMed (including Medline; National Institutes of Health; Bethesda, Maryland USA), Cochrane Library (The Cochrane Collaboration; London, United Kingdom), and Science Direct (Elsevier; Amsterdam, Netherlands) were searched using medical subject headings (MeSH) and relevant keywords, including: “Sexual Behavior,” “Sexual function,” “Sexually function,” “partnered sexual behaviors,” “sexuality,” “sexual dysfunction,” “Intimate partner violence,” “Domestic violence,” “sexual activity,” “COVID-19,” “COVID-19 virus,” “coronavirus disease 2019,” “SARS-CoV-2,” “pandemic,” and “outbreak.” They were used in isolation or in combination through the Boolean method.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
All English-language articles published in the world on disasters and domestic violence or sexual function and COVID-19 which were of high quality entered the study. Articles of low quality, studies conducted on other infectious diseases, people over 60 years, people without sexual activity, or people with genitourinary diseases were excluded from the study. Those articles published in non-English language were also excluded. Additionally, review studies, meta-analysis, case reports, or series of cases were excluded as well.
Quality Assessment
The quality of the articles was assessed using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. Reference Von Elm, Altman and Egger18 This checklist has 22 parts that are scored based on the importance of each section, the lowest score of this checklist is 15 and the maximum is 33. In this study, score 20-24 as low, score 25-29 as medium, and score upper 29 as high quality were considered.
Screening and Data Extraction
The search results were imported into the Endnote software v.x8-1 (Clarivate Analytics; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA) and duplicate titles were deleted. Selected studies entered the abstract reading process and were checked against the inclusion criteria. Of which, the most relevant studies were selected for independent full-text reading by two researchers (SD, JB), and a third person as the expert-epidemiologist checked the result. Reasons for the rejection of studies were mentioned, and in case of disagreement between the researchers, a third researcher evaluated the research. A checklist was used to extract data from the selected studies in terms of the sample size, study location, year of study, type of study, COVID-19 pandemic, sexual function, and intimate partner violence.
Selection of Articles
By searching databases, 286 studies were extracted. Initially, the articles were entered into Endnote software, and after an initial review, 78 articles were removed from the study due to duplication. Then, by reviewing the titles and abstracts of articles, 169 articles were removed due to irrelevance, and after reviewing the full text of articles, 28 articles were excluded due to assessing other infectious diseases rather than COVID-19 and people with genitourinary diseases. Finally, eleven articles met the inclusion criteria and entered the process of systematic review (Figure 1).
The PRISMA Flow Diagram.
Abbreviation: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019.
Results
A total of eleven cross-sectional studies, including five studies on COVID-19 and domestic violence and six studies on COVID-19 and sexual function conducted in 2020, were included in the systematic review. The specifications of the reviewed articles are presented in Table 1.
Characteristics and Appraisal of Included Articles (n = 11)
Violence and COVID-19
Domestic violence against women is one of the problems that endangers women’s health, and its elimination is one of the public health concerns in the world. Reference Bott, Guedes, Goodwin and Mendoza27–Reference Bradbury-Jones and Isham29 In the 2020 study of Jetelina, et al in the United States, the prevalence of domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic was reported to be 18.0%. Also, changes in income and employment increased the incidence of domestic violence by 1.63-times. Reference Jetelina, Knell and Molsberry19 In a 2020 study by Gebrewahd, et al in Ethiopia, the prevalence of domestic violence against women during the COVID-19 pandemic was estimated at 26.6%. The prevalence of psychological violence was 13.3%, physical violence was 8.3%, and sexual violence was 5.3%. Reference Gebrewahd, Gebremeskel and Tadesse20 According to the 2020 study of Sediri, et al conducted in Tunisia, the prevalence of domestic violence against women was 4.4% before the COVID-19 pandemic and 14.4% during the holidays. Moreover, women who were exposed to violence before the COVID-19 pandemic had a 19.34-fold increased chance of encountering violence during the pandemic. Reference Sediri, Zgueb and Ouanes21 In the 2020 study by Gosangi, et al in the United States, the incidence of physical domestic violence against women during the COVID-19 pandemic was 1.8-times higher than before. Reference Gosangi, Park and Thomas22 In a 2020 study by Agüero, et al in Peru, which examined the number of calls made to the Domestic Violence Control and Assistance Unit, the findings showed that the number of calls during the COVID-19 pandemic was increased by 48.0% compared with before the pandemic. Reference Agüero23 In general, according to the results of the studies, it can be mentioned that the COVID-19 pandemic had increased violence against women and negatively affected their security due to various negative effects on society, including economic, psychological, and social factors.
Sexual Function and COVID-19
Another factor that has been affected by COVID-19 is sexual function in the community. According to the results of previous studies, factors such as stress, anxiety, lack of security, and health risks affected the sexual performance of men and women. Reference Panzeri, Ferrucci, Cozza and Fontanesi13 The following is a review of the studies conducted in the world to investigate the relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic and sexual function in women and men.
In the 2020 study by Panzeri, et al in Italy, which examined the relationship between COVID-19 and sexual function in women and men, sexual desire increased in 12.1% of men and in 18.7% of women and decreased in 18.2% of men and in 26.4% of women; arousal increased in 15.2% of men and in 20.9% of women and decreased in 12.1% of men and in 20.9% of women; sexual intercourse increased in 9.1% of men and in 26.4% of women and decreased in 24.2% of men and in 30.8% of women; sexual satisfaction increased in 3.0% of men and in 13.3% of women and decreased in 6.1% of men and in 15.4% of women; and difficulty reaching orgasm decreased in 6.1% of men and in 17.6% of women. In general, study participants reported that there was not much change in their sexual function compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic. Reference Panzeri, Ferrucci, Cozza and Fontanesi13 In a 2020 study by Hensel, et al in the United States on sexual intercourse during the COVID-19 pandemic, in 22.7% of the participants, the desire to be hugged, kissed, and touched by a sexual partner was decreased. In 19.4% of the participants, the desire of romantic sex was reduced. In addition, 8.9% were reluctant of receiving sexual or nude messages or images by a sexual partner. Reference Hensel, Rosenberg and Luetke24 In a 2020 study by Schiavi, et al in Italy, women’s sexual performance during the COVID-19 pandemic was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire. According to the findings, the average numbers of sexual intercourse per month had decreased by 6.3-times before the COVID-19 pandemic and by 2.3-times during the pandemic. Mean score of sexual function in the time before the pandemic and at the time of the pandemic had decreased from 29.2 to 19.2, tendency from 3.8 to 3.2, arousal from 4.8 to 3.6, lubrication from 4.9 to 4.4, orgasm from 4.7 to 4.2, sexual satisfaction from 5.9 to 4.2, and pain from 4.8 to 4.5. Reference Schiavi, Spina and Zullo2 In a 2020 study by Fuchs, et al in Poland, evaluation of female sexual function during the COVID-19 pandemic using the FSFI questionnaire showed that the mean score of female sexual function before the pandemic compared to the pandemic time was decreased from 30.1 to 25.8, tendency from 4.5 to 4.2, arousal from 5.1 to 4.1, lubrication from 5.4 to 4.5, orgasm from 4.8 to 3.9, sexual satisfaction from 5.2 to 4.7, and pain from 5.1 to 4.3. Reference Fuchs, Matonóg and Pilarska25 Moreover, in the 2020 study of Yuksel, et al in Turkey, the mean score of sexual function six to twelve months before the COVID-19 pandemic had decreased from 20.52 to 17.56, tendency from 3.42 to 3.94, arousal from 3.34 to 2.17, lubrication from 2.49 to 2.62, orgasm from 3.47 to 2.02, sexual satisfaction from 2.97 to 2.45, and pain from 4.83 to 4.36. However, the average numbers of sexual intercourse per week increased from 1.9 to 2.4. Reference Yuksel and Ozgor14 In the 2020 study by Luetke, et al in the United States, which examined differences in romantic relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic, 34.0% of the participants reported experiencing conflict in romantic relationships during the coronavirus outbreak. A comparison of the conflicts in the subsets of romantic relationships during the pandemic compared to before the pandemic showed that the frequency of hugging, kissing, cuddling, or holding hands increased by 3.2-times compared to before the pandemic. Also, masturbation decreased 3.7-times, sexual partner satisfaction or genital touch decreased 4.6-times, and vaginal sexual contact decreased 4.4-times. Reference Luetke, Hensel, Herbenick and Rosenberg26 In general, based on the findings of these studies, it can be mentioned that exposure to the COVID-19 pandemic had increased the sexual dysfunction of people in the community, which could lead to family disputes, domestic violence, and mental illness.
Discussion
The findings of the present study showed that domestic violence against women increased during the coronavirus outbreak; also, the mean score of sexual function and its components including lubrication, desire, arousal, orgasm, pain, and sexual satisfaction during exposure to the COVID-19 pandemic had decreased compared to before. The results of studies have also shown that anxiety caused by facing crises or various diseases can affect sexual function in individuals. The results of a 2020 study by Jakob, et al examining the challenges of sexual therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic show that in their sample, 39.9% had sex at least once a week. Moreover, the prevalence of sexual activity in their samples was less than 40.0%. Reference Jacob, Smith and Butler30 Lemiller, et al in their 2020 study on a population from several countries showed that 43.5% of participants reported a decrease in sexual quality along with a sharp decrease in the frequency of intercourse during forced restrictions compared to the previous year. Reference Lehmiller, Garcia, Gesselman and Mark31 An online poll also conducted during the recent COVID-19 pandemic between March and April 2020 in the UK and Spain reported that 10.0% of participants masturbated during the extraordinary quarantine. Reference Ibarra, Mehrad and Mauro12 In another online study conducted in China in May 2020, the results showed that 30.0% of participants reported an increase in the numbers of masturbation. Reference Li, Tang and Song32 Li, et al in 2020 showed that major crises can widely lead to sexual dysfunction and reduced sexual satisfaction. Reference Li, Tang and Song32 In the 2020 study conducted by Baran, et al, 23.9% of the respondents to the questionnaire stated that they worry about the transfer of coronavirus to their spouses and that this led to a decrease in the numbers of sexual intercourse during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Reference Baran and Aykac33 Fear of the spread of the disease, and fear of having sex with a sexual partner who works outside the home during the pandemic, led to increased anxiety and depression, and as a result, affected married life. Reference Schiavi, Spina and Zullo2 In the 2020 study by Micelli, et al, it was found that more than one-third of couples who were planning to have children ignored this decision at the time of the coronavirus outbreak. Reference Micelli, Cito and Cocci34 Among the various reasons, the fear of pregnancy outcomes related to coronavirus infection led to a change in sexual function. Reference Fuchs, Matonóg and Pilarska25
Although various studies have shown positive effects of mental health on sexual function and marital quality, anxiety and panic caused by the possibility of transferring the coronavirus and the unknown definitive routes of transmission caused a variety of changes in people’s sex lives. Reference Costa and Brody35,Reference Flynn and Gow36 Decreased access to physical activity, out-of-home social centers, limited access to mental health care (individual or marital therapy), and other health care services, home quarantine, and limited social interactions are some of the stressors caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Reference Luetke, Hensel, Herbenick and Rosenberg26
In addition, the present review findings showed that domestic violence had increased during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to before. The results of previous studies showed that dealing with major crises can lead to reduced access to health services and facilities, exposure to sexual violence and poverty, and vulnerability to poor reproductive and sexual health outcomes. Reference Warren, Post, Hossain, Blanchet and Roberts37,Reference Sohrabizadeh, Jahangiri and Jazani38 The results of the 2020 study by Gebrewahd, et al showed that in the study population, the prevalence of violence against women by their sexual partner during the COVID-19 pandemic was 26.6%, among which psychological violence had the highest percentage (13.3%), and then physical (8.3%) and sexual (5.3%) violence were, respectively, the next ranks. Reference Gebrewahd, Gebremeskel and Tadesse20
It appears that factors such as isolation and confinement, limited access to help resources to protect individuals from violence, which has increased pressure on and control of marital relationships as a result of the spread of the coronavirus, are significant factors in the persistence of violence. Unfortunately, the public’s fear and distrust of recognizing the virus and the social policies adopted to control it have led to further harm to these individuals by putting more pressure on stressful relationships and isolating victims of violence; this isolation has jeopardized victims’ access to important psychological and social services, and led to an under-estimation of the issue of violence among those in quarantine. Reference Gupta39–Reference Parveen and Grierson41 Prolonged home quarantine reduces peace of mind due to increased parental conflict and increases the likelihood of partner violence. Uncertainty about the future and fear of the unknown events also led to increased psychological consequences, such as stress and anxiety, followed by increased violence. Reference Brooks, Webster and Smith42
Prior to the coronavirus outbreak, the World Health Organization estimated that 35.0% of women world-wide had experienced physical or sexual violence from their sexual partner during their lifetime. However, many strategies which are critical to ensuring the public health of the community during this dreaded disease may put people at greater risk for physical, sexual, and psychological violence. Reference Holmes, O’Connor and Perry43
Limitations
Limitations of this study included: (1) the limitation of the number of studies on domestic sexual violence and sexual function; (2) previous studies have been conducted in only a few countries around the world; and (3) only English-language studies were included and relevant studies in other languages, or those without English abstract, were not included in the study.
Conclusion
Based on the findings of this systematic review, the COVID-19 pandemic has affected sexual function and intimate partner violence, a cause to sexual dysfunction, and has increased domestic violence. Regarding to the global spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, large populations are affected by this phenomenon. Accordingly, it is recommended that policy makers and health officials intervene to prevent the occurrence of these disorders through interventions such as social, economic, psychological, and health support.
Conflicts of interest/funding
none
