Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:57:39.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prothymosin alpha expression in the vertebrate testis: a comparative review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2017

Massimo Venditti
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Sez. Fisiologia Umana e Funzioni Biologiche Integrate, Università degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’ 80138, Napoli, Italy.
Sergio Minucci*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Università degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’ 80138, Napoli, Italy.
*
All correspondence to: Sergio Minucci. Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Università degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’ 80138, Napoli, Italy. Tel: +39 0815665829. E-mail: sergio.minucci@unicampania.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Prothymosin alpha (PTMA) is a highly acidic, intrinsically disordered protein that was first extracted from rat thymus and characterized as an immunogenic factor but soon detected in a variety of mammalian tissues. The presence of a nuclear localization signal and the adoption of a peculiar random-coil conformation are among the reasons behind its interaction with several molecular partners, hence at this time PTMA is known to be a very conserved and widely expressed molecule, involved in numerous and diverse biological processes. Only few studies have tried to weigh its possible involvement in reproduction, specifically in male gametogenesis: first reports have suggested that PTMA might be associated with the proliferative and early-meiotic phases of mammal spermatogenesis. Some years later, a comparative project on vertebrate spermatogenesis reported the isolation, for the first time, of prothymosin in a non-mammalian species, the amphibian Pelophylax esculentus. PTMA transcript and protein are localized in the germinal compartment, from spermatocytes to spermatozoa. A congruent pattern has been highlighted in studies on the fish Torpedo marmorata and Danio rerio, and in the mammal Rattus norvegicus, in which the expression of PTMA has been found in meiotic and post-meiotic germ cells inside testicular cysts and tubules. Moreover, its presence has been confirmed in rat and human spermatozoa (associated with the acrosome); its retention in the apical region of the head after the acrosome reaction revealed a striking conservation of the pattern during phylogenesis and suggested a possible role for the protein in gametogenesis and in fertilization.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Localization of Ptma in Pelophylax esculentus testis. In September, Ptma was present in the GC nuclei from SPCII (arrows, A, B, E) to elongating SPT (arrowheads, A, C) and in the cytoplasm of interstitial LC (asterisks, A, D). In April, (F) Ptma was also present in the nuclei of SPZ (arrows); the arrowhead indicates a SPG. Scale bar represent 20 µm (Ferrara et al., 2009).

Figure 1

Figure 2 A schematic illustration of the progression of the germinal line in the tubules, with pictures of selected cysts that describe the pattern of Ptma sub-localization in germ cells during zebrafish spermatogenesis (for review of the germ cell types see Schulz et al., 2010). Ptma-positive cell types are marked with a ‘V’, the negative types with an ‘X’. Non-stained secondary SPC are marked by a ‘?’. SA and SA diff: undifferentiated and differentiated (A) SPG; SB: (B) SPG. L/Z: leptotene/zygotene primary SPC; P: pachytene primary SPC; D/MI: diplotene/metaphase I primary SPC; S/MII: secondary/metaphase II SPC; EST: early SPT; LST: late SPT; SPZ: spermatozoa; LE: interstitial Leydig cells (Pariante et al., 2016).

Figure 2

Figure 3 PTMA localization in rat testis at 27 (A, B), 35 (C) and 60 (D) dpp. It is present in LC (arrowheads in A, B), in pachytene I SPC (arrows in A, B) and in newly formed SPT (asterisks in B). It is also localized in differentiating SPT (arrows in C, D). PTMA localization in the head of differentiating rat SPT in comparison with schematic representations of acrosome system biogenesis during the different phases of spermiogenesis (E). Scale bars represent 20 µm in (A–D), and 5 µm in the inset (Ferrara et al., 2010).

Figure 3

Figure 4 PTMA (green, C, D, G, H) co-localization with either the acrosome (red, B, D) or the PT (red, F, H) on rat eSPZ. PTMA is definitely associated with the acrosome while its signal is distinctly dorsal to the PT. The nucleus is marked in blue (A–H). Scale bars represent 5 µm (Ferrara et al., 2011).

Figure 4

Figure 5 PTMA (green, C, D, G, H) co-localization with either the acrosome (red, B, D) or the PT (red, F, H) on human SPZ. The data show that PTMA co-localizes with the acrosome and not with the PT, in human as in the rat. The nucleus is marked in blue (A–H). Scale bars represent 5 µm (Ferrara et al., 2011).

Figure 5

Figure 6 Analysis on rat (A–F) and human (G–L) SPZ after the induction of acrosome reaction (B, D, F, H, J, L) and on control SPZ (A, C, E, G, I, K). IAM is retained (green, A, B, G, H), while acrosome staining decreases (red, C, D, I, J). PTMA is easily detectable both in control and in reacted SPZ (green, E, F, K, L). Scale bars represent 5 µm (Ferrara et al., 2011).