Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:50:07.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dissimilar peptidase production by avirulent and virulent promastigotes of Leishmania braziliensis: inference on the parasite proliferation and interaction with macrophages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

A. K. C. LIMA
Affiliation:
Disciplina de Parasitologia, Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia (DMIP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (FCM), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
C. G. R. ELIAS
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Estudos Integrados em Bioquímica Microbiana, Departamento de Microbiologia Geral, Instituto de Microbiologia Prof. Paulo de Góes (IMPPG), Centro de Ciências da Saúde (CCS), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
J. E. O. SOUZA
Affiliation:
Disciplina de Parasitologia, Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia (DMIP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (FCM), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
A. L. S. SANTOS
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Estudos Integrados em Bioquímica Microbiana, Departamento de Microbiologia Geral, Instituto de Microbiologia Prof. Paulo de Góes (IMPPG), Centro de Ciências da Saúde (CCS), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
P. M. L. DUTRA*
Affiliation:
Disciplina de Parasitologia, Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia (DMIP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (FCM), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author: Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Rua Prof. Manoel de Abreu, 444, PAPC 5° andar, Vila Isabel, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20550-170, Brazil. Tel: +55 21 2587 6487. Fax: +55 21 2587 6148. E-mail: pdutra@uerj.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In the present paper, we have analysed the cellular and extracellular proteolytic activity profiles in 2 distinct Leishmania braziliensis strains: a recently isolated (virulent) and a laboratory-adapted (avirulent) strain. Quantitative and qualitative differences on the peptidase expression were observed in both strains. For instance, low-molecular mass acidic cysteine peptidase activities were detected exclusively in the virulent strain. Similarly, metallopeptidase activities were mainly produced by L. braziliensis virulent promastigotes. Interestingly, metallo- and cysteine peptidase activities were drastically reduced after several in vitro passages of the virulent strain. Western blotting, flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy analyses were performed to detect homologous of the major leishmania metallopeptidase (gp63) and cysteine peptidase (cpb) in virulent and avirulent strains of L. braziliensis. Our results revealed that the virulent strain produced higher amounts of gp63 and cpb molecules, detected both in the surface and cytoplasm regions, than the avirulent counterpart. Metallo- (1,10-phenanthroline and EGTA) and cysteine peptidase (E-64) inhibitors arrested the growth of L. braziliensis virulent strain in a dose-dependent manner, as well as the association index with peritoneal murine macrophages. Conversely, these peptidase inhibitors did not affect either the proliferation or the cellular interaction of the avirulent strain. Corroborating these findings, the pre-treatment of the virulent strain with both anti-peptidase antibodies promoted a prominent reduction in the interaction with macrophages, while the association index of the avirulent strain to macrophage was only slightly diminished. Moreover, the spent culture medium from virulent strain significantly enhanced the association index between avirulent strain and macrophages, and this effect was reversed by 1,10-phenanthroline. Collectively, the results presented herein suggest that peptidases participate in several crucial processes of L. braziliensis.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Peptidase profiles in avirulent (av) and virulent (v) strains of Leishmania braziliensis. Promastigote forms were grown in Schneider's medium supplemented with 10% FCS at 28°C for 96 h. (A–C) Gelatin-SDS–PAGE showing the cellular (A, B) and extracellular (C) proteolytic activity profiles, in which the gel strips were incubated for 40 h at 37°C in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 5·5, supplemented with 2 mM DTT (A, C) or in 10 mM glycine-NaOH buffer, pH 9·0 (B). The gel strips were incubated in the absence or in the presence of proteolytic inhibitors as follows: 1 μM E-64 (E64) or 1 mM 1,10-phenanthroline (Phen). In the enzymatic inhibition experiments, the virulent parasite extracts were used. (D) Western blotting showing the reactivity of extracellular polypeptides of both L. braziliensis strains with the anti-gp63 antibody. In all cases, the numbers on the left indicate the molecular masses of polypeptides, expressed in kilodaltons.

Figure 1

Table 1. Densitometric analyses of the peptidase synthesized in the avirulent and virulent strains of Leishmania braziliensis

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Detection of gp63- and cpb-related molecules in avirulent (av) and virulent (v) strains of L. braziliensis. (A) Flow cytometry analysis showing the anti-gp63 and anti-cpb antibodies binding to the cell surface of L. braziliensis strains. Paraformaldehyde-fixed cells were incubated in the absence (black curves) or in the presence (gray curves) of anti-gp63 (upper panel) or anti-cpb (lower panel) antibodies as described in the Materials and Methods section, and then analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorter. For simplicity, only the autofluorescence of virulent strain is shown, since the avirulent strain is similar (data not shown). In the same way, parasites treated with secondary antibody or pre-serum presented the same fluorescence intensity depicted in the autofluorescence (data not shown). (B) Fluorescence microscopy analyses of the cellular distribution of gp63 and cpb homologues in L. braziliensis avirulent (av, av1) and virulent (v, v1) strains: the figures represent the differential interferential contrast images (av, v) and the corresponding immunofluorescence labeling (av1, v1) by anti-gp63 (upper panel) or anti-cpb (lower panel) antibodies. The bar represents 10 μm. (C) Western blotting showing the gp63- (upper panel) and cpb-like (lower panel) polypeptides detected in the whole cellular extract from L. braziliensis strains. (D) The anti-tubulin monoclonal antibody was used as a control for sample loading in the western blottings. The numbers on the right indicate the apparent molecular masses of the reactive polypeptides, expressed in kilodaltons (kDa).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Gelatin-SDS-PAGE showing the proteolytic profiles of virulent promastigotes of L. braziliensis harvested from consecutive subpassages in vitro. The samples correspond to cellular extracts (25 μg) after disruption of parasites freshly isolated from hamster (0) or samples from subpassages 1, 2 and 3. The gel strips were incubated in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 5·5, supplemented with 2 mM DTT for 40 h. The numbers on the left indicate the molecular masses of polypeptides, expressed in kilodaltons.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Effect of metallo (EGTA or 1,10-phenanthroline [PHEN]) and cysteine (E-64) peptidase inhibitors on the growth rate of virulent (A–C) or avirulent (D) strains of L. braziliensis. Parasites were cultured in Schneider's medium plus 10% FCS in the absence (control cells) or presence of different concentrations of proteolytic inhibitors at 28°C up to 120 h. (E) Phase-contrast images of non-treated virulent (a) and avirulent (b) promastigotes or virulent strain treated with different proteolytic inhibitors at 10 μM as follows: (c) EGTA, (d) 1,10-phenanthroline or (e) E-64. For simplicity, the images of the avirulent parasite treated with the proteolytic inhibitors were not shown, since any morphological alterations were observed. In a similar way, the images of the virulent flagellates treated with the other proteolytic inhibitors concentrations were not shown, because the morphological alterations were similar to the parasites treated with peptidase inhibitors at 10 μM. Data shown are means±standard deviations of three independent experiments, which were performed in triplicate.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Effect of proteolytic inhibitors and anti-peptidase antibodies on the interaction between L. braziliensis promastigote cells and macrophages. Both virulent (A) and avirulent (B) strains were treated for 1 h with metallo (EGTA and 1,10-phenanthroline [PHEN]) or cysteine (E-64) peptidase inhibitors at different concentrations. After that, parasites were washed in RPMI medium and the interaction process was performed as described in Materials and Methods section. Alternatively, the parasites were pre-incubated for 1 h with the anti-gp63, anti-cpb or pre-serum at 1:1000 dilution (C). The viability of the parasites was not affected by the proteolytic inhibitors or anti-peptidase antibodies treatments used in these experiments (data not shown). The parasite–macrophage interactions were performed at 37°C for 1 h in a ratio of 5 promastigotes to 1 macrophage cell. The values represent the mean±standard deviation of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Symbols denote systems treated with proteolytic inhibitors or anti-peptidase antibodies that had an association index significantly different from the control (, P<0·05; Student's t test).

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Effect of the spent culture supernatant-derived from virulent strain of L. braziliensis on the interaction process between avirulent promastigotes and macrophage cells. The avirulent (av) strain was interacted with macrophage cells (MΦ) in the absence or in the presence of 25 and 50% culture supernatant-obtained from virulent strain (Sv), which was previously treated or not with 1 mM 1,10-phenanthroline (PHEN). The macrophage viability was not altered by the presence of spent culture medium neither of PHEN (data not shown). The parasite–macrophage interactions were performed at 37°C for 1 h in a ratio of 5 promastigotes to 1 macrophage cell. The values represent the mean±standard deviation of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Symbols denote systems treated with proteolytic inhibitors or anti-peptidase antibodies that had an association index significantly different from the control (, P<0·05; Student's t test).