Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T23:43:44.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Puzzling and ambivalent roles of malarial infections in cancer development and progression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2016

ERIC FAURE*
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, I2M, UMR-7373, 13453 Marseille, France
*
*Corresponding author: Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, I2M, UMR-7373, 13453 Marseille, France. E-mail: eric.faure@univ-amu.fr

Summary

Scientific evidence strongly suggests that parasites are directly or indirectly associated with carcinogenesis in humans. However, studies have also indicated that parasites or their products might confer resistance to tumour growth. Plasmodium protozoa, the causative agents of malaria, exemplify the ambivalent link between parasites and cancer. Positive relationships between malaria and virus-associated cancers are relatively well-documented; for example, malaria can reactivate the Epstein-Barr Virus, which is the known cause of endemic Burkitt lymphoma. Nevertheless, possible anti-tumour properties of malaria have also been reported and, interestingly, this disease has long been thought to be beneficial to patients suffering from cancers. Current knowledge of the potential pro- and anti-cancer roles of malaria suggests that, contrary to other eukaryotic parasites affecting humans, Plasmodium-related cancers are principally lymphoproliferative disorders and attributable to virus reactivation, whereas, similar to other eukaryotic parasites, the anti-tumour effects of malaria are primarily associated with carcinomas and certain sarcomas. Moreover, malarial infection significantly suppresses murine cancer growth by inducing both innate and specific adaptive anti-tumour responses. This review aims to present an update regarding the ambivalent association between malaria and cancer, and further studies may open future pathways to develop novel strategies for anti-cancer therapies.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Alignement between two regions of the human Thrombospondin 1 type 1 repeats and parts of various plasmodial circumsporozoite proteins. The thrombospondin 1 peptides, which inhibit both FGF-2 or VEGF-induced angiogenesis (Iruela-Arispe et al. 1999), the NLS domain of P. yoelii (Ding et al. 2012) and peptides of P. vivax and P. falciparum analogous from those which inhibit in vitro the translation (Frevert et al. 1998) have been underlined. A line has been drawn above the amino acids the CD36 binding sequence (reviewed in Lawler, 2002). Human thrombospondin 1 (accession number (acc. n°): AAI36471), P. falciparum (acc. n°: AAW78182), P. vivax (acc. n°: BAO10674), P. malariae (acc. n°: CAA05617) and P. yoelii (acc. n°: CDZ10959). Identical amino acids are indicated by asterisks, and partly conserved amino acids are indicated by dots (two-dot regions show a higher degree of similarity). FGF, fibroblast growth factor; NLS, nuclear localization signal; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Figure 1

Table 1. Details about experimental studies suggesting that Plasmodium spp. or some of their products might play a pro- or an anti-tumour role