Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:47:02.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Testing and evaluation of thermal-barrier coatings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2012

Robert Vaßen
Affiliation:
Institute of Energy and Climate Research, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Germany; r.vassen@fz-juelich.de
Yutaka Kagawa
Affiliation:
Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Japan; kagawa@rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Ramesh Subramanian
Affiliation:
Siemens Energy Inc., Orlando, FL; Ramesh.Subramanian@siemens.com
Paul Zombo
Affiliation:
Engine and Component Diagnostics, Siemens Energy Inc., Orlando, FL; Paul.Zombo@siemens.com
Dongming Zhu
Affiliation:
Durability and Protective Coatings Branch, Structures and Materials Division, NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH; dongming.zhu@nasa.gov

Abstract

Thermal-barrier coatings are complex systems with properties that largely depend on their specific microstructure. Their properties change during operation, typically leading to degradation. A further difficulty arises from the fact that this degradation also depends on specific loading conditions that can be rather complex. Different laboratory setups are described that simulate, at least partially, the actual loading conditions. In addition, sensing and nondestructive methods are described that are targeted toward reliable operation of a gas-turbine engine with thermal-barrier coated components.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012
Figure 0

Figure 1. Crack resistance of inter-splat cracks (formed between individual deposition splats during cooling) and R-curve from extension of long delamination cracks in wedge opening loading (WOL).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Photograph of the Jülich gas burner rig heating a disk-shaped thermal-barrier coating sample with back-side compressed air cooling. In the central part of the flame, a solution of calcium-magnesium alumino-silicates is injected to spray onto the hot surface.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Laser heat flux thermal gradient cyclic test results of a 127-μm-thick, precracked thermal-barrier coating specimen subject to 20 min heating and 4 min cooling thermal cycling. The initial circular crack was 2 mm in diameter. The effective thermal conductivity clearly correlates with the crack propagation until the coating spalled after 200 cycles.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Examples of typical behavior and damage in an electron-beam physical vapor deposited thermal-barrier coating (TBC) system during in-phase thermomechanical fatigue (IP-TMF) testing mode: (a) Creep curve of normalized average strain ε/ε0, where ε0 is strain at first loading. SUB, substrate; BC, bond-coat layer. (b) Ratcheting behavior of the TBC system shown by the increasing strain at low temperature after each loading cycle. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (c–f) show (c) TBC layer cracking (image of a polished section, parallel to loading axis), (d) macroscopic appearance of multiple fragmentation of TBC layer, (e) void formation in the BC layer, and (f) fatigue crack growth and new thermally grown oxide (TGO) formation in the BC layer. (g) Delamination of TBC layer, (h) illustration of anisotropic TGO morphology (arrow, loading direction), and (i) an example of stress distribution in the TGO layer.

Figure 4

Figure 5. (a) Experimental setup for measuring the thermal-barrier coating (TBC)/metal interface temperature through the TBC by Eu luminescence under laser high heat flux thermal gradient tests.30(b) TBC interface temperature measured as a function of TBC surface and metal back surface temperatures with various heat fluxes, for two electron beam physical vapor deposited coating thicknesses. A good correlation of the sensor measurements with the heat flux measurements has been observed with an embedded Eu-YSZ sensor at high temperature.30,34

Figure 5

Figure 6. Example of turbine features that can be observed by an infrared camera during engine operation at 3600 rpm with gas path temperatures higher than 1200°C. Pictures are “still” frames of rotating blades. (a) Thermal-barrier coating (TBC) spallation on the leading edge of the blade as seen by the dark edge of the TBC; (b) local heating due to rubbing between two components—bright feature near rub; (c) local cooling at a blade platform—dark due to cooling air leakage; (d) platform TBC delamination, observed as bright/dark line corresponding to a buckled TBC; (e) overlapping cooling holes, where the dark cooling streams are not giving good coverage; and (f) platform TBC crack observed as a faint bright line.