Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T18:33:33.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characteristics of different {10-12} twin variants in magnesium alloy during room temperature dynamic plastic deformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2013

Chao Lou
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
Xiyan Zhang*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
Gaolin Duan
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
Jian Tu
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
Qing Liu
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: kehen888@163.com

Abstract

Recently, the {10-12} twin variants activated during dynamic plastic deformation (DPD) of Mg alloy have been investigated by analyzing their Schmid factors (SFs), and their contributions to deformation have been calculated. During DPD of Mg–3%Al–1%Zn alloy, different {10-12} variants are generated relative to their SFs when initial grains have defined orientations with one a-axis of the crystal lattice at roughly 0 or 30° from the compression direction. The volume fraction of twins deeply influences the strain accommodated by twinning. The {10-12} variant pair with the maximum SF accommodated about 90% of the twinning strain. Its high volume fraction indicated that both nucleation and growth mechanisms played important roles in the strain accommodation. Other {10-12} variants had a lower volume fraction and accommodated twinning strain mainly by twin nucleation and made a lesser contribution to the total deformation.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. (a) Microstructural characteristics of the as-rolled material; (b) (0001) and (c) (10-10) pole figures of the as-rolled material. RD, TD, and ND represent the rolling direction, the transverse direction, and the normal direction, respectively.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Schematic illustration of the sample orientations used for DPD testing. LD represents the loading direction.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. EBSD maps and (0001) pole figures of AZ31 samples with different strains: (a) ε = 2.1%, (b) ε = 4.3%, (c) ε = 6.5%, (d) ε = 8.3%. LD represents the loading direction.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. (a) The microstructure of DPD sample with ε = 4.3%. Red lines indicate {10-12} twin boundaries. Sketch maps (b) and (c) show grain A and B in (a) and their crystallographic orientations and SFs potential {10-12} variants, respectively. Here, M represents grain matrixes. T1 and T2, marked by red color, represent activated {10-12} twin variants.

Figure 4

TABLE I. The statistical numbers of grains generating {10-12} twins.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. SF distribution of different {10-12} twin variants for the DPD samples with ε = 4.3%: (a) grains only containing one variant pairs; (b) grains containing two variant pairs. 1 to 5 represents SF level of activated {10-12} variants, “1” is the highest and “5” is the lowest in a particular grain. # represents “the first-kind variants.”

Figure 6

TABLE II. The twinning volume fractions of different {10-12} twin variants.

Figure 7

FIG. 6. Strains induced by different {10-12} variant pairs under different strains.

Figure 8

FIG. 7. The number percentage of grains generating different {10-12} variants.

Figure 9

FIG. 8. (10-10) pole figures of matrix of grains generating different variant pairs orientations under different strains: (a) ε = 2.1%, (b) ε = 4.3%, (c) ε = 6.5%, (d) ε = 8.3%.

Figure 10

FIG. 9. The (10-10) pole figure of 81 grains generating different variant pairs. The red circle and the yellow triangle represent the orientation of one a-axis deviated about 0 or 30° from RD toward TD, respectively.