Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T21:22:07.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

YIELD AND NITROGEN RECOVERY OF RAPE (BRASSICA NAPUS L.) IN RESPONSE TO APPLICATION OF LEGUMINOUS LEAF LITTER AND SUPPLEMENTAL INORGANIC NITROGEN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2015

FIONA MUCHECHETI
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Production and Soil Science, University of Pretoria, P. Bag X20 Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa
IGNACIO C. MADAKADZE*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Production and Soil Science, University of Pretoria, P. Bag X20 Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa
*
‡Corresponding author. Email: casper.madakadze@up.ac.za
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The short term nutrient supply of Leucaena leucocephala, Calliandra calothyrsus, Acacia angustissima and Acacia karoo prunings with or without supplemental inorganic nitrogen were tested using rape (Brassica napus L.) in a field trial. Prunings were applied at a rate of 5 t ha−1 to soil, alone or with supplemental N at 37.5 kg N ha−1 (¼ of recommended N). The respective decomposition and N release constants of the prunings were 9.15 and 9.70% for L. leucocephala; 6.15 and 6.40 for A. angustissima; 4.50 and 4.90 for C. calothyrsus; and 2.20 and 2.10 for A. karoo. These constants were best described by the (lignin+polyphenol)-to-nitrogen ratio of the prunings. Total biomass over the two seasons ranged from 1.40 to 17.28 t DM ha−1 and total growth rates ranged from 2.34–26.70 g plant−1 week−1. The cumulative N recovery at week 9 ranged from 21.1–66.1 %. Legume tree leaves can be used as a source of N for vegetable production. Farmers who use high tannin leaf litter are recommended to supplement with mineral N in order to assure adequate N availability during plant growth.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 
Figure 0

Table 1. Soil chemical properties of the top 0.3 m soil layer of the experimental site, Hatfield Experimental Farm, Pretoria, SA.

Figure 1

Table 2. Average maximum and minimum temperatures during March–May of the 2009 and 2010 seasons, mirrored against the long term means recorded at the Hatfield Experimental Farm, Pretoria, SA.

Figure 2

Table 3. Chemical composition of legume tree prunings applied as soil ameliorants during March–May of the 2009 and 2010 growing seasons at the Hatfield Experimental Farm, Pretoria, SA.

Figure 3

Figure 1. Leucaena leucocephala, Acacia angustissima, Calliandra calothyrsus and Acacia karoo prunings remaining in litter bags incubated in the soil on several retrieval times over a 13-week period at the Hatfield Experimental Farm, Pretoria, SA.

Figure 4

Table 4. Decomposition rate (kD, percentage rate of weekly decomposition) and N release (kN, percentage rate of weekly N release) constants for the different legume tree prunings used as soil ameliorants at the Hatfield Experimental Farm, Pretoria, SA.

Figure 5

Figure 2. The relationship between decomposition rate (kD) and nitrogen release rate (kN) constants and the (lignin+soluble polyphenol)-to-N-ratio of the four leguminous prunings. The straight lines were fitted by regression using data from all prunings.

Figure 6

Table 5. Partitioning of biomass of rape at week 9 after transplanting at the Hatfield Experimental Farm, Pretoria, SA. Each value is an average of the two growing seasons, March–May 2009 and 2010.

Figure 7

Figure 3. Total biomass yield of rape following soil amendment with legume tree prunings with or without inorganic N at Hatfield Experimental farm, Pretoria, SA. Lines extending beyond bar graphs denote standard error of the mean.

Figure 8

Table 6. Mean weekly growth rates of the different plant tissues of rape at the Hatfield Experimental Farm, Pretoria, SA.

Figure 9

Figure 4. Patterns of biomass accumulation by rape during March--May of the 2009 and 2010 growing seasons at the Hatfield Experimental Farm, Pretoria, SA. Bars extending beyond symbols denote standard error of the mean.

Figure 10

Figure 5. Shoot nitrogen concentration of growing rape at Pretoria, SA. Each point is an average of the two growing seasons, March--May 2009 and March–May 2010. Bars extending beyond symbols denote standard error of the mean.

Figure 11

Table 7. Mean rates of nitrogen recovery (%) by rape from week 2 to 9 after transplanting at the Hatfield Experimental Farm, Pretoria, SA.

Figure 12

Figure 6. Changes in the nitrogen recovery rates by rape following soil amendment with prunings of L. leucocephala and A. karoo with and without inorganic N mirrored against recovery rates from plants that received inorganic N at 37.5 and 150 kg N ha−1 during the 2009 growing season at Pretoria, SA. Bars extending beyond symbols denote standard error of the mean.